Actually, we could write a small book about the various facts and circumstances that impact on how-to-remove-real estate from your corporation. The book would answer many questions. Stuff like: Are you a C corporation or an S corporation? Are there retained earnings? And how much? How much has the real estate appreciated? And on and on.

Each additional fact might change the tax strategy needed to answer the question — to cover all the possibilities is beyond the scope of this column. Instead, let’s set up the facts and circumstances that represent over 95 percent of the calls and the recommended solution to get-the-real-estate-out-of-the-corporation problem.

Typical facts and circumstances

Joe owns Success Co., a C corporation with a large amount of retained earnings and one or more pieces of real estate that has significantly appreciated in value. Most of the time the real estate has a building on it, but it could be vacant. (If Success Co. is an S corporation, it has a large amount of old C corporation earnings frozen in place, and the same real estate facts).

The solution

As you read what follows, keep in mind that you don’t have to know how to build a car in order to drive one. Put it another way: Don’t sweat the technical details; simply concentrate on the unbelievable favorable tax results.

Here’s the process:

• Joe forms a family limited partnership (FLIP) outside of Success Co. Then, Success Co. contributes vacant land (if the land is improved, Success keeps the improvements as leasehold improvements) to the FLIP. The land is worth $1 million (of course, it could be any amount). In exchange, Success Co. receives (ownership of 99 percent of the FLIP) limited partnership interests. Joe contributes $10,000 in cash to the FLIP for a one percent general partnership interest. As the general partner Joe has all the voting rights and makes all the decisions.

• Success Co. leases the real estate from the FLIP for $100,000 per year.

• An independent appraiser values the FLIP interest (after applying a 40 percent discount for general lack of marketability) at $600,000. Yes, the $1 million land is only worth $600,000, because it’s in the FLIP-for tax purposes.

• Success Co. contributes 99 percent of its limited FLIP interests to a charitable lead trust (CLT) with the following terms: The FLIP will pay $99,000 per year to the CLT for eight years. (NOTE: Typically the CLT then makes contributions to Joe’s Family Foundation). Let’s pause to follow the money. Success pays $100,000 rent to the FLIP; the FLIP pays $99,000 to the CLT, which makes contributions to Joe’s foundation.

• First some information: According to IRS tables, the value of the annuity (the $99,000 to be received for eight years by the CLT) is $569,000. So, the value of the one percent remainder interest (the part of the FLIP still owned by Success Co. immediately after the gift of the FLIP to the CRT) is only $31,000 (the $600,000 discounted value of the land, minus the $569,000 value of the eight-year annuity gifted to the CLT, leaves $31,000 as the value of the remainder interest). Simply put, Success Co. owns an asset that according to the IRS is worth only $31,000. Joe’s children buy the one percent remainder interest from Success Co. for $31,000.

• After eight years the CLT ends. Joe’s children, who are the beneficiaries of the CLT receive and now own 99 percent of the limited FLIP interests. Remember, they bought (and own) the other one percent from Success Co. eight years ago. The CLT and Success Co. are out of the picture. Better yet, the real estate is out of the corporation, owned 100 percent by Joe’s children. And there is a bonus: The real estate is also out of Joe’s estate. The entire transaction is tax-free to the FLIP, the CLT, Joe, the kids and Success Co. (might owe tax on the $31,000 sale).

Now one warning: The above is an easy way to get your real estate-tax-free-out of your corporation. But you must use experienced advisors who know how to dot the ‘i’s and cross the ‘t’s.

Do you have real estate in your corporation? If so, raise your hand and keep reading. About once a month, we get a call at the office asking a question something like this: “How can I get real estate out of my corporation without being taxed to death?”

Actually, we could write a small book about the various facts and circumstances that impact on how-to-remove-real estate from your corporation. The book would answer many questions. Stuff like: Are you a C corporation or an S corporation? Are there retained earnings? And how much? How much has the real estate appreciated? And on and on.

Each additional fact might change the tax strategy needed to answer the question — to cover all the possibilities is beyond the scope of this column. Instead, let’s set up the facts and circumstances that represent over 95 percent of the calls and the recommended solution to get-the-real-estate-out-of-the-corporation problem.

Typical facts and circumstances

Joe owns Success Co., a C corporation with a large amount of retained earnings and one or more pieces of real estate that has significantly appreciated in value. Most of the time the real estate has a building on it, but it could be vacant. (If Success Co. is an S corporation, it has a large amount of old C corporation earnings frozen in place, and the same real estate facts).

The solution

As you read what follows, keep in mind that you don’t have to know how to build a car in order to drive one. Put it another way: Don’t sweat the technical details; simply concentrate on the unbelievable favorable tax results.

Here’s the process:

• Joe forms a family limited partnership (FLIP) outside of Success Co. Then, Success Co. contributes vacant land (if the land is improved, Success keeps the improvements as leasehold improvements) to the FLIP. The land is worth $1 million (of course, it could be any amount). In exchange, Success Co. receives (ownership of 99 percent of the FLIP) limited partnership interests. Joe contributes $10,000 in cash to the FLIP for a one percent general partnership interest. As the general partner Joe has all the voting rights and makes all the decisions.

• Success Co. leases the real estate from the FLIP for $100,000 per year.

• An independent appraiser values the FLIP interest (after applying a 40 percent discount for general lack of marketability) at $600,000. Yes, the $1 million land is only worth $600,000, because it’s in the FLIP-for tax purposes.

• Success Co. contributes 99 percent of its limited FLIP interests to a charitable lead trust (CLT) with the following terms: The FLIP will pay $99,000 per year to the CLT for eight years. (NOTE: Typically the CLT then makes contributions to Joe’s Family Foundation). Let’s pause to follow the money. Success pays $100,000 rent to the FLIP; the FLIP pays $99,000 to the CLT, which makes contributions to Joe’s foundation.

• First some information: According to IRS tables, the value of the annuity (the $99,000 to be received for eight years by the CLT) is $569,000. So, the value of the one percent remainder interest (the part of the FLIP still owned by Success Co. immediately after the gift of the FLIP to the CRT) is only $31,000 (the $600,000 discounted value of the land, minus the $569,000 value of the eight-year annuity gifted to the CLT, leaves $31,000 as the value of the remainder interest). Simply put, Success Co. owns an asset that according to the IRS is worth only $31,000. Joe’s children buy the one percent remainder interest from Success Co. for $31,000.

• After eight years the CLT ends. Joe’s children, who are the beneficiaries of the CLT receive and now own 99 percent of the limited FLIP interests. Remember, they bought (and own) the other one percent from Success Co. eight years ago. The CLT and Success Co. are out of the picture. Better yet, the real estate is out of the corporation, owned 100 percent by Joe’s children. And there is a bonus: The real estate is also out of Joe’s estate. The entire transaction is tax-free to the FLIP, the CLT, Joe, the kids and Success Co. (might owe tax on the $31,000 sale).

Now one warning: The above is an easy way to get your real estate-tax-free-out of your corporation. But you must use experienced advisors who know how to dot the ‘i’s and cross the ‘t’s.

But if you ever want to see anger, frustration and bitterness, meet with the beneficiaries (usually the kids) of an estate when they are told to write a seven- or eight-figure check to the IRS — for estate taxes.

Taxes that could have been avoided with proper planning.

Tragic!

A recent post-death estate planning consultation got us thinking about what you are now reading. Yes, the estate tax was exactly $3,167,000 after Mom died; Dad had died six years earlier. The really sad part of this story is that Dad’s and Mom’s entire estate tax liability could have been legally avoided with a rather simple estate plan.

Mom and Dad were survived by three kids and eight grandchildren. The business that Dad started back in the mid-50s was worth $4.5 million and owned 100 percent by Mom when she died.

According to Dad’s estate tax return, the business, which he left to Mom, was worth $2.9 million when he died. No estate tax (because of the marital deduction) was paid when Dad died.

Dad and Mom had a typical estate plan: a will and a trust. The trust created two trusts: one trust to take advantage of passing $1 million tax-free (the amount that was tax-free when Dad died) and a second trust to capture the marital deduction.

The tax-free amount is $2 million in 2006, rising to $3.5 million in 2009 and back to $1 million in 2011.

There is no estate tax if you die in 2010. I’m betting Congress will change these amounts before 2010 (or sooner).

The real answer (to why many people procrastinate and don’t complete a comprehensive estate plan during their life) is the deceased person whose estate caused the tax did not have to personally write that big check to the IRS.

Whenever we are about to plan an estate, we estimate the amount of estate tax that ultimately will be due.

Then we ask the client to write a check to the IRS for that amount. The client always gets the point. Then, we plan the estate so the client’s wealth goes to their family, instead of the IRS.

The plan must be a lifetime plan, that implements the proper strategies, as necessary, during your life. A plan contained in the typical will and trust-like Mom’s and Dad’s above-only enriches the IRS.

The person (your executor) who must write the check to pay your estate tax is helpless when it comes to minimizing or eliminating the estate tax. Only you, while you are alive, can eliminate the estate tax… by creating the proper comprehensive estate plan.

Here are the three things you can do to drive the estate-tax devil away:

(1) Learn all you can (this column is a good start);

(2) No matter what your age, put a complete estate plan into place now (then monitor it every two to four years);

(3) Only work with experienced professionals who can show you how to pass all your wealth — intact —to your family (if you are not sure, get a second opinion).

Every family I work with is different. So are their businesses, their situations, their problems. In spite of these differences, I’m rarely surprised by anything totally new. But one reader sent me something I had never seen before.

Here’s the story.

After about an hour on the phone discussing an estate plan, son Sam calling at the request of dad Joe agreed to send me some typical information: tax returns, financial statements and a copy of the existing plan. About one week later, a heavy box arrived with a five-inch stack of documents. About four inches worth were nine separate family limited partnerships. They were the same except each partnership owned a different asset: the family business, a residence, investments, etc.

As I thumbed through the papers, I couldn’t help thinking about the drunk who was told, “A shot of whiskey each day is good for you.” The guy who did Joe’s estate plan was clearly drunk on partnerships.

One thing should be made clear: I am an enthusiastic cheerleader for the use of limited partnerships in estate planning. Use ‘em all the time. But this overkill of a single strategy just didn’t do the best possible job.

Using the computations of the adviser, the IRS would get more than $2 million in estate taxes. Another $1.1 million of IRS enrichment was likely because of a gross misuse of the partnership strategy.

What does a family limited partnership accomplish? It allows you as a general partner to totally control the use of any asset transferred to the partnership yet reduce the value of the assets transferred. For example, $1 million of assets transferred to a partnership are usually worth only about $650,000 for tax purposes. That $350,000 discount in a 55 percentestate-tax bracket would reduce your estate-tax burden by $192,500. Not bad!

A familylimited partnership is also a great asset-protection strategy. Creditors can’t get at the assets in the partnership. Neither can divorcing spouses of your kids, who are usually the limited partners.

Used properly, a partnership is almost a perfect tax tool. In general, don’t use them to own the stock of your family business. Nor should one be used for non-income-producing personal assets, like a home or car. It’s a valuable strategy for almost every other asset you might own: publicly traded stocks and bonds, real estate, you name it.

Without covering every detail, we terminated the partnerships that held the family business and two family homes. The business elected S corporation status and was transferred to an intentionally defective trust, and the residences were transferred to qualified personal residence trusts. Those are similar concepts that allow you to heavily discount the value of the assets transferred to them.

We used the liquid assets in two other partnerships to pay the premiums on second-to-die life insurance on Joe and his wife, which was owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust that we created. That trust removes life insurance from the taxable estate of the husband and wife.

When all the smoke clears, Joe and his four children, including Sam, will be enriched $4 million to $7 million more than the original overkill plan, depending on how long Joe and his wife live.

One warning: This is an example of overindulgence in one tax strategy. Although the above descriptions cover the main points of how Joe’s problems were solved., this is not a do-it-yourself kit. There are a number of traps and exceptions. Only proceed with the help of an expert.

The ruling shows you how to take advantage of some favorable tax law while avoiding pitfalls. Good stuff!

Well, there is one slight problem to using the technique: You must drop dead before your family can enjoy the benefits of Letter Ruling 9116031.

But wait, hold the phone. The ruling has one redeeming quality. Really!

First, the facts: Joe, his wife, Mary, and their children owned all the stock in a family business. Joe died in 1990 and Mary inherited all of his stock.

(Note: Mary’s tax basis — for computing capital gains — is the fair market value (FMV) of the stock on the day Joe died. For example, if the FMV was $1 million and she sold it for $1 million, there would be no capital gains tax.)

The fact that Joe’s tax basis, while he was alive, was $25,000, is immaterial. Mary immediately sold all of her stock back to the corporation.

Here’s the general rule: When you or any member of your family sells stock back to your corporation (called a redemption), the redemption is usually taxed as a dividend — a tax disaster.

But there is a special tax-saving exception for a family member who has owned the stock for 10 years or more: If he/she divests all interest in the company (including any position as an officer or director), the redemption is treated as a sale (gets favorable capital gains treatment, instead of being a dividend).

Since Mary sold all (stock she owned before Joe died and stock she inherited from him) of her interest in the corporation, the purchase by the corporation of her shares was considered a bona fide sale (redemption) and not a dividend — a big tax victory.

When all the smoke cleared, not only had Mary escaped a big dividend income tax bill, but she had succeeded in effectively transferring the business to her children. How? Since the kids now owned all the remaining issued and outstanding stock, they owned 100 percent of the business.

To sum up: Mary walked off with a near-tax-free capital gain, (the price paid to Mary for the stock was a bit more than the exact FMV of the stock inherited from Joe) while the kids walked off with the business.

A fantastic tax result.

Stop and think about your own business succession plan for a moment. Isn’t that the result you want — a fantastic tax-free (for income, gift and estate taxes) result? Yes, you can get that tax-free result every time.

More often than not, succession plans are implemented during life, which means there is a second issue (the first issue is tax-free): control.

The typical business owner wants control of his business for as long as he lives. So, when you sit down with your professional advisors, make sure you accomplish a perfect solution to the two key issues: (1) a tax-free transfer and (2) keeping control for as long as you live.

If any other result is offered (no matter how good or smart it sounds), get a second opinion.

Recently, I visited a successful family business in North Carolina, owned by a semi-retired 64-year-old named Joe and run by his son, Sam, a 36-year-old.

Joe called me. He wanted a second tax opinion for a business transfer plan and an estate plan put in place by Sam (with the advice of his professional advisors, the “best” estate planning team in the county) almost two years ago.

Wow, this patient was really sick (running a high tax fever, bleeding lots of tax dollars).

This is the story of the symptoms, the diagnosis and the “magic tax potions” that cured the patient.

First, the facts:

Joe owns 98 percent of two corporations: a profitable S corporation (Success Co.), which operates a string of stores, and a C corporation (a tax-paying corporation, called R/E Co.), which owns real estate leased to Success Co.

The real estate has an income tax basis of $1 million, but a current fair market value of about $6 million. Sam owns the remaining two percent of the stock of both corporations. Each of the corporations is the owner and beneficiary of a separate $1 million insurance policy on Joe’s life.

Four more little details:

• Joe’s second wife, Mary, is 45 years old and they have a premarital agreement that gives Mary the income from one-half of the value of Joe’s assets at his death for as long as Mary lives. But get this: none of the stock of Success Co. can be used to provide Mary her income.

• An artificially low price in a buy/sell agreement would force Joe’s estate to sell his stock in Success Co. back to Success Co. and the same for R/E Co. (Result: Sam would then own 100 percent of both corporations.)

• Joe has two other grown children who are not in the business.

• Joe is not insurable.

The diagnosis:

• The $1 million in life insurance payable to R/E Co. would kick up an unnecessary alternative minimum tax.

• The full $2 million of insurance would be included in Joe’s estate because he controls both corporations, but the $2 million (less the alternative minimum tax of about $150,000) would belong to the corporations, not Joe’s estate.

• There are not enough liquid assets to satisfy the obligation to Mary. Worse yet, if the obligation to Mary is met, there would be zero dollars (outside of the corporations) to pay an estimated $3.5 million estate tax liability. Simply put, the estate would be broke.

Our objectives to cure Joe’s tax illness are clear:

• Reduce the value of Joe’s estate.

• Get cash to fund the obligation to Mary.

• Pay the estate tax.

Here are the five major tax medicines I recommended to cure Joe’s business transfer and estate plan:

• Merge R/E Co. into Success Co. This maneuver is tax-free. R/E Co. is worth about $6 million as a real estate investment company but, as part of the operating company, its value is reduced by at least $2 million for estate tax purposes. Estate tax saving — over $1 million.

• Transfer the nonvoting stock (created after the merger) to a grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT), which reduces the value of Success Co. by about 40 percent for estate tax purposes. This maneuver saves about $.5 million in estate taxes.

• Joe takes the $2 million in insurance policies out of the corporations and gives it to his children. Result: The value of Joe’s estate drops about $2 million and will save another $1 million plus in estate tax.

• Change Joe’s will to put the entire estate tax obligation on the children. The $2 million in income tax-free/estate tax-free insurance proceeds will handle the entire estate tax load when Joe dies.

• Make sure Joe’s will qualifies for the 100 percent marital deduction for Mary’s one-half share, thus deferring any estate tax on this portion of Joe’s estate until Mary dies. Yes, there are other details and nuances in the plan, including gifts to Joe’s children, but these five tax medicines cured the patient.

What’s the lesson to be learned from this true-life Joe/Sam/Mary story? Always, yes always, get a second opinion after your estate plan is done, preferably before any documents are signed.

Invariably, about half of my clients bring up two critical and related operational problems:

“How do I keep my top executives?” (The headhunters — usually working for a competitor — are always circling.)

And, “How do I attract new quality people?”

The problem is not new, and more than likely, it will get worse in the future as the bidding war for talented people escalates.

What to do?

Almost 20 years ago, after struggling with the problem for about a year, we decided to develop an organized plan to find the answers. We interviewed our few client/owners who did not have the two problems. We also interviewed their key management people.

Then came the hard part: getting permission to interview the key people at clients that were suffering with the problem.

What quickly became clear was that almost 100 percent of the best key people have the soul of an entrepreneur. Yet for various reasons, they do not want to strike out on their own or couldn’t (usually because they can’t raise the required capital).

Solving the top-executive problem turned out to be simple: mimic ownership, give them the same challenges as an owner and, if successful, most of the rewards. Additional interviews just kept reconfirming the original solution.

The top (nonowner) executives wanted four core benefits of ownership:

• A piece of the action — a share of company profits;

• Pay when sick or disabled;

• Adequate retirement pay when it’s time to leave the company;

• Death benefits for their family. (“Like my piece of the equity if I get hit by a bus,” or similar words, is the way most executives put it.) Over the years we have created hundreds of contracts (the technical name is a nonqualified deferred compensation agreement; the nontechnical name is a golden handcuff agreement) that attract and keep the kind of key people you want in your organization.

Let’s take a closer look at each of the four desired benefits:

• A piece-of-the-action plan — Typically, this is a percentage of the profits in excess of a specific dollar amount. Often, the percentage grows as the business and profits grow.

For example, Sam Topgun will get 4 percent of all before-tax profits in excess of $200,000 per year. Profits in excess of $400,000 will be entitled to 6 percent. Say the amount earned under the plan for year one (or any subsequent year is $21,000).

Usually, Sam will get about one-third ($7,000) in cash and the balance ($14,000) is deferred. The deferred portion is invested for Sam’s benefit. When does Sam get the deferred portion and the accumulated earnings (usually called the side fund)? When the employee becomes disabled, dies or reaches retirement age (the age is usually set around 58 for younger key employees and in the 65-age range for older key people). When the key employee becomes entitled to collect the side fund (say it is $500,000), it usually is paid out in equal annual installments (say 10 years) or $50,000 per year plus the additional investment earnings for that year.

• Disability — The employee gets paid when sick or disabled, whether for a day or for a lifetime. This benefit is covered by long-term disability insurance. It is essential that “disability” is defined word-for-word in your agreement the same as it is defined in the disability insurance contract.

• Retirement — The side fund (described previously) supplements any regular retirement program (like a 401(k) or profit-sharing plan).

Typically, the executive is allowed to direct the investment of the side fund, which remains an asset of the employer. The tax consequences of the arrangement follow: The side-fund earnings are taxable to the employer. When the employee receives a distribution, the company gets a deduction for the exact amount distributed and the employee must report the identical amount as taxable income.

If the employee leaves for any reason — except because of disability, death or retirement — the entire side fund is forfeited by the employee and remains the property of the company. Hence, the name, “golden handcuffs.”

• Set amount of money at death — When an owner dies, the family can sell the business (assuming it is not transferred to the kids). A similar benefit (really a death benefit) should be given to the employee. Of course, this benefit should be insurance funded. We have been doing these nonqualified plan for years. Done right, they work. Often, when an owner does not have a family member to pass the business to, the side fund serves as the down payment by one or more of the key people to buy the business from the owner.

Two warnings:

This article does not attempt to cover every detail and the endless variations for tailoring an agreement that is perfect for your company. Always — and we mean always — work with a professional advisor. Years of experience have proved that the right agreement will make your good people even better.

Also, and sadly, there is no agreement we have ever seen that will make a bad employee even a little bit better. In a way, this topic of getting and keeping good people is frustrating. This is why we have never been able to develop a cookie-cutter solution. Yes, the four core benefits are almost always the same or similar. But the bells, whistles and unique requirements of each situation make it impossible to write a complete report — much less a book — on the subject.

When I began my professional practice as a certified public accountant and lawyer back in the 1950s, a millionaire was hard to find. Today, millionaires are plentiful. And when it comes to estate planning, they scurry around trying to find a professional who can lower their estate tax before they get hit by the “final bus.” The Newsweek article by Robert J. Samuelson, like so many other articles, entertainingly explored the problem but offered no solutions.

Let’s set the scene for how you — whether mom and dad trying to give it away tax-free or one of the kids on the receiving end — can, in fact, solve the problem. Let’s start with the elders, mom and dad, who have the wealth.

Fact number one: You aren’t dead yet. Typical estate plans, such as separate wills and trusts for him and her, don’t speak until you are dead — too late to beat the tax collector. The solutions lie in lifetime planning. A lifetime plan keeps you in control of your wealth for as long as you live, yet transfers it—including your business—to your kids (and grandkids) while you are alive.

Fact number two: Years of experience have taught us that wealth is always passed to the younger generations of the family. And then the younger generations step into mom’s and dad’s shoes and typically increase the family wealth.

This gives the second generation an even bigger estate tax problem than mom and dad had.

Here’s how we solve this do-not-enrich-the-IRS estate-tax problem:

Logic tells you that children, particularly business children, are likely to become wealthy.

Usually these children accumulate more wealth than their mom and dad — to be repeated again when the family wealth goes to the grandchildren two generations later. Because of this generation-to-generation wealth transfer, we view each generation of the family separately in terms of their special needs and objectives.

Yet, the plan should not be just for mom and dad. It should be a comprehensive and integrated plan for the entire family. Following is an overview of how it’s done.

Keep your wealth — every dollar of it — in your family, instead of losing it to taxes.

• First Generation. Install a lifetime plan that removes wealth from your taxable estate during life. Use strategies like a qualified personal resident trust for your residence; an intentionally defective trust for your business; a subtrust for your profit-sharing plan, rollover IRAs and similar plans; a family limited partnership for your other assets (typically investments, like stocks, bonds and real estate); and an irrevocable life insurance trust for insurance, probably second-to-die. All of these strategies — and there are many others — begin their work now while you are alive and allow you to stay in control of your assets, including your business, for as long as you live.

Of course, we’ll dovetail your will and trust (death documents) with your lifetime plan. But when done right, your death documents just clean up what’s left. The first part of the family plan, including a business succession plan, and your wealth transfer plan are completed tax-free while you and your spouse are alive.

• Your Kids—Second Generation. After completing a comprehensive plan for mom and dad, it is easy to project what the financial future of the kids might look like. As soon as we finish the plan for the first generation, we start a plan for each of the kids, based on their individual assets and objectives.

• Your Grandchildren— Third Generation. The plans for this generation are closely tied to the plans of the two older generations. Probably the most important point to keep in mind, because of the young ages in this generation, is getting the children into a tax-free environment as soon as possible, a wealth-building must. These plans center on short-term and long-term tax-advantaged strategies that fulfill lifetime needs: education, buying a house, starting a business and, if they don’t go in to the family business, building a retirement fund.

Would you believe that the basic tax law, the Internal Revenue Code and regulations, is about 50,000 pages long with no logical, organized theme? There’s also a constant stream of Internal Revenue Service rulings and case law. No one person can know it all—not Congress, which passes the law, nor the IRS, which enforces it.

There are three main ways the federal tax law picks your pocket and becomes your legal partner: payroll taxes, the income tax and the estate tax. So, how can you fight back? One day, just for fun, we (four tax guys) started to count the ways to legally get around paying the three taxes listed. We were just getting warmed up when we counted 227 options and stopped. The following are five areas in which you can save money from taxes:

1. Payroll Taxes. This money-stealing parasite is persistent and expensive: This year, $16,404 on the first $106,800 of your earnings goes to the tax man. That’s a scandalous 9.76 percent. For earnings of more than $106,800, you pay an additional 2.9 percent.

Here are examples of the three most common ways to lose payroll taxes to the IRS: The first mistake involves Joe, the owner of an S corporation who taxes a large salary (often $500,000 or more) and takes a huge bonus at the year’s end to bring down profits. For this S corporation, a tax-free dividend instead of compensation would save a bundle of unnecessary payroll taxes and would cost no more in income taxes. A second payroll tax mistake is when owners’ wives and moms take a salary when they either don’t work or are overpaid. It is much better tax-wise to give them a gift. The third mistake is operating a business as an LLC, which makes all income to the owner(s) subject to payroll taxes.

2. Asset Protection. In a heartbeat, your family wealth, including your business, can be depleted or even destroyed by a lawsuit.

Keep your business thin by keeping only those assets—typically, necessary cash, inventory and receivables—needed for operations in your business. Here are some basic sub-strategies: Elect S corporation status; personally own (via separate LLCs) any new real estate or expensive equipment, and lease it to your operating company; and never own delivery vehicles in your operating company. Put the vehicles into a separate corporation or LLC.

The sad fact is, we can’t protect the assets inside of your operating company, but we can protect you and your spouse. All of your significant assets are simply retitled using typical lifetime planning documents—such as family limited partnerships, LLCs and appropriate trusts.

3. Life Insurance. You can save money in taxes whether you, your spouse or your kids own the insurance.

Critical issues concerning life insurance are premium cost, the death benefit and the tax due on the benefit at death (usually the estate tax). The following are common ways to modify insurance plans to save premiums or increase the death benefit without additional costs:

• For single life or second-to-die insurance, you can get a cash-surrender value of more than $200,000 on a policy that is 9 years old or older. This results in significantly more death benefit for the same premium cost or a significantly reduced premium cost for the same death benefit.

• If you, the husband, are at least 55 years old, worth more than $5 million and have insurance on your life only, you are wasting premium dollars. Second-to-die coverage with your wife will typically give you the same death benefit for about 35 percent less premium cost.

• If you have more than $400,000 in a qualified plan such as a 401(k) or IRA, that amount is subject to a double tax (income and estate) of as much as 73 percent to the IRS. On average, you can turn every $270,000 of after-tax dollars into $3 to $5 million (tax-free), depending on your age and health. This plan works for second-to-die or single life insurance.

4. Business Succession. This affects your business and your business kids. The typical business owner wants to transfer the business to his kid(s) so that he and his kid(s) don’t get killed by taxes. He also wants to treat his non-business kids fairly, ensure that he controls his business for as long as he lives and ensure that the company stock stays in the family by never going to a kid’s ex-spouse. Every one of these goals is easily accomplished. Best of all, the business can be transferred tax-free, with no income tax, gift tax or estate tax for the owner or the kids.

5. Estate Plan. A proper estate plan is actually two plans: a lifetime plan and a death plan. The plans are designed to cover every significant tax-saving possibility—from the minute the lifetime plan is created until after you get hit by the final bus (covered by the death plan).

But you should hear Joe howl about the cost of paying the annual insurance premiums on his irrevocable life insurance trust. Joe’s trust owns a $4 million insurance policy on his life with annual payments of $87,000. Yes, he needs the insurance to cover a portion of his potential estate-tax liability. No, he couldn’t buy second-to-die — normally at substantially less premium cost — because his wife was uninsurable when the irrevocable trust bought his policy.

It should be noted that an irrevocable trust protects the death benefits of a life insurance policy from the clutches of the estate tax.

Now, stop for a moment and look at your insurance cost situation. Chances are you’ll find you have one or more of the same complaints as Joe. He’s got three:

• Every year when Joe wrote his check to the trust for $87,000, he got four exclusions of $11,000 each, or $44,000 annually, one for each of his two sons and two grandkids. That left a taxable gift of $43,000 ($87,000 minus $44,000), which eats away at his $1 million lifetime unified credit. No cash gift-tax now. Simply put, the first $1 million of taxable gifts do not require cash to pay the gift tax, but are paid by using your lifetime unified credit. When Joe gets hit by the final bus, those annual taxable gifts will turn into an estate-tax liability (most likely 55 percent of the total of all those annual taxable gifts for Joe). Starting in 2006 the $11,000 is raised to $12,000.

Joe fumes!

• Interest rates are much lower now than when Joe bought the policy. Result, the premiums are much more than the projections made by his insurance agent.

Joe’s expletives are not fit to repeat here.

• Joe’s smart. He figured out that in his tax bracket — state and federal combined — he must earn $145,000 and pay $58,000 in income tax in order to have the $87,000 needed to pay his insurance premium which is actually a gift to the trust. Joe fervently argues that life insurance premiums should be deductible. Good idea. But we need an act of Congress to change the Internal Revenue Code.

Now you know why Joe is a distressed taxpayer.

Readers of this column know I have a network of professionals to help me work my tax magic. So I, the tax knight, and my network of merry men, went to work.

We had Joe’s irrevocable trust restructured with his insurance using a strategy called “premium financing.” Essentially, premium financing is an economic concept where policy premiums are paid by a lending bank. Like before, Joe’s premium financing policy is owned by the trust. When Joe dies the bank loans and accrued interest on the loans will be paid out of the policy proceeds.

Joe’s premium financing is set up for $5 million — net proceeds after paying off the bank — to the trust, and the beneficiaries are his kids and grandkids. Joe’s only potential out-of-pocket costs are $60,000 to initiate the bank loan the year the premium financing is set up. If Joe lives to be 100, the total additional cost will be about $352,000, with varying small amounts to be paid each year to maintain the loan. Of course, if Joe dies sooner, these costs stop.

Now, what are the final results for Joe by using premium financing?

• To start, no more $87,000 annual premium payments — actually, no more premium payments. All three of his complaints disappeared.

• No out-of-pocket costs — not the $60,000 or any portion of the $352,000. Why? Because the cash surrender value of the original $4 million policy owned by his trust was more than enough to cover all of the premium financing costs. The old policy was canceled to free up the cash surrender value and put the premium financing strategy in place without any further out-of-pocket costs to Joe.

Even Joe is happy.

Premium financing is a relatively new concept — easy to understand, complex to implement. It really takes a network of experienced professionals working together. The results create an economic windfall — all tax-free.

But sorry, everyone cannot take advantage of premium financing. You must qualify by bringing two things to the table:

First, you must be insurable or if married, one spouse must be insurable, so your irrevocable trust can buy second-to-die coverage.

Next, you must be worth a minimum of $5 million. The more you are worth and the more investment-type assets such as stocks, bonds or even real estate you have, the more likely you will qualify for this strategy.

If you are worth around $6 million or less, the answer is almost always yes. If you are worth more, the answer is usually no.

Let’s talk real numbers. Consider that taxpayer Joe is worth $10 million and his neighbor Jack is worth $20 million. Both men are married. Joe’s estate tax estimate, using 2011 rates, would be around $4 million.

Jack’s would top out at a tragic $9.5 million.

The higher your wealth, the lower your chance for avoiding the estate tax.

But there are ways to entirely avoid the impact of the estate tax.

If, for example, you are worth $8 million, there are ways to get the full $8 million (all taxes paid in full) to your family. Similarly, if you are worth $80 million, the entire $80 million can go to your family. It can always be done, whether you’re single or married, young or old, or even insurable or uninsurable.

Let’s play the game together.

Substitute your own numbers into the little example that follows.

Suppose you are worth $12 million and married. First, subtract $2 million ($1 million if you’re single), which leaves $10 million. Multiply $10 million by 50 percent to get your bitter estate tax bite. Finally, add 55 percent for your worth in excess of the $10 million.

Now, here’s the secret for legally avoiding the estate tax and creating tax-free wealth. There are two ways: charity and life insurance. If you do them right, both put you in a tax-free environment.

Here’s a real-life story of Joe.

He’s a 63-year-old business owner from Nebraska who winters in Florida and is married to Mary, 62. Joe and Mary are worth $23 million. Using our little example above, the estate tax monster would eat $11.05 million of their wealth.

We designed a comprehensive and coordinated succession plan and estate plan for Joe and Mary that included four significant strategies: an intentionally defective trust to transfer Joe’s business to his kids tax-free, a family limited partnership for their investment assets (a stock and bond portfolio and real estate), and the two different life insurance strategies, which are described below.

A side note before continuing: Every case is different. Different people have various businesses situations and factors. A big factor for Joe and Mary was their excellent health for their age. So insurance was front and center.

Now, to the third strategy: Joe had $600,000 in his company’s 401(k) and $1.5 million in various IRAs, which we transferred into the 401(k), a tax-free transfer. Then we created a subtrust for the 401(k) that purchased $6.5 million of second-to-die life insurance on Joe and Mary. Because of double taxation, first income tax and then estate tax, the $2.1 million in the 401(k) without the subtrust would net only about $600,000 for Joe’s heirs. Sorry, but the tax collector would get the rest, $1.5 million.

The subtrust allows the entire $6.5 million of life insurance to go to Joe and Mary’s heirs tax-free. In effect, we turned $600,000 into $6.5 million. Neat!

One more point: We showed Joe how to invest his $2.1 million in his 401(k) in TIPs, or transfer insurance policies, a form of senior settlements.

TIPs earn in excess of 16 percent on average per year, without risk. Joe’s investments were averaging only 7 percent per year with stocks, bonds and mutual funds

Ask your professional to check out subtrusts and TIPs.

The final strategy: Joe and Mary needed an additional $5 million of life insurance. At their ages — if you don’t use a subtrust — the premiums are steep. We used a strategy called premium financing, or PF, to buy $5 million of life insurance on Joe’s life. PF allows you to buy life insurance without paying your premiums in cash. Instead, premiums are paid though a trust you create that pay each premium by the trustee signing a nonrecourse note to the lending bank.

Interest is added to the loan.

All premium loans, plus accrued interest, will be paid out of the death benefits when Joe dies. The only costs paid by Joe are to the banks for initiating and maintaining the loan equaling about $60,000 paid the first year and an additional $180,000, which will be paid in small amounts each year to age 100.

It’s an economic home run that nets $5 million tax-free to Joe and Mary’s heirs for a small out-of-pocket cost of $240,000 or less, which is paid over a 30-year period.

No question about it, PF is the most inexpensive way to buy life insurance (whether you buy $5 million, $10 million or more). You must qualify to use PF, be creditworthy and be worth a minimum of $5 million.