Posts Tagged ‘second opinion’

Yes, It’s OK To Beat Up The IRS — Legally, Of Course!

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

The facts, problems and solutions of this article are so typical of the readers of this column who call me for help, that I felt compelled to write about it.

Read slowly, chances are you will see some of yourself or someone you know.

Joe (age 74) owns 52 percent of an S corporation (Success Co.), and each of his three children owns 16 percent of Success Co. He has two boys, Tom (47) and Dick (43), who have been in business with Joe since they graduated from college.

Joe’s daughter, Harriet, was not and never will be involved in the business. Joe lost his first and only wife last year.

Following is a list of Joe’s assets:

• Various liquid investments:$190,000

• 52 percent of Success Co.: $1,630,000

• Real estate leased to Success Co.: $600,000

• Balance in Rollover IRA: $780,000

• Residence and summer home: $435,000

• Total: $3,635,000.

Joe’s lawyer (an estate planning expert with a fine reputation), who just completed Joe’s estate plan, correctly computed the estate tax (using 2011 rates) at $1,419,771. His only recommendation: Buy $1.5 million in insurance to pay the tax.

Joe called me for a second opinion. After a long telephone conference, following is how Joe spelled out his goals:

1. Control Success Co. (and the rest of his assets) for as long as he lives.

2. When he is gone, to have Success Co. owned 50 percent each by Tom and Dick.

3. Make sure he can maintain his lifestyle for as long as he lives.

4. The dollar value that Harriet receives from Joe’s estate should be equal to the amount received by each of her brothers.

5. Find a way to have each of his kids receive one-third of what he is worth now, all taxes paid in full. (Joe laughed a bit at this goal; he didn’t think it was possible).

Stop for a moment. Substitute you own list of assets and goals (remember, if you are married, some day either you or your spouse will be the first to pass on). What follows is the plan we implemented for Joe and the strategies we selected to accomplish Joe’s five specific goals (in the same order as the goals).

We recapitalized Success Co. (a tax-free transaction) so Joe now owned 52 percent of the controlling voting stock (52 of 100 shares) and 52 percent of the nonvoting stock (5,200 of 10,000 shares).

We transferred the liquid investments and the real estate to a family limited partnership (FLIP). As the general partner (owned 1 percent of the FLIP), Joe kept control of these assets. He will make annual gifts ($12,000 each) of limited partnership interests to the kids. These limited interests (99 percent of the FLIP) have no voting rights and are entitled to significant discounts (about 35 percent) for tax purposes. As a result, Joe can give about $19,000 to each kid of limited FLIP interests every year, yet for tax purposes the interests are only worth $12,000.

Joe sold the 5,200 shares of non-voting stock to a so-called defective trust (defective for income tax purposes) for $1.5 million plus interest. The trust paid for the stock with a note. Success Co. will distribute S Corporation dividends each year to the trust, which will then pay off the note to Joe.

Because the trust is defective for income tax purposes, every dime that Joe receives (both for principal to pay off the note and interest) is tax-free. The beneficiaries of the trust are Tom and Dick who will each own half of the 5,200 non-voting shares when the note is fully paid and the trust terminates.

Joe’s 52 voting shares will go to Tom and Dick when Joe dies. The shares owned by sister, Harriet, will be redeemed by Success Co., according to a new buy/sell agreement, when Joe passes on. Then Tom and Dick will each own 50 percent of Success Co.

Joe’s flow of cash to maintain his lifestyle would come from many sources. (a) a small salary from Success Co., plus all of his usual perks; (b) The note payments from the trust (remember, the entire $1.5 million plus the interest is tax-free to Joe because of the defective trust); and (c) distributions from the rollover IRA.

Actually, during the years (about eight to 10) while the note is being paid off, Joe will have more cash than he needs to live. This excess cash will be put into the FLIP (and, of course, will be available for distribution in future years).

Actually, all the assets of the FLIP will be available to Joe if needed.

As a final back up, Joe will enter into a death benefit agreement with Success Co. that will pay Joe $75,000 per year starting when Joe retires (probably never) and continuing until the day he dies.

We created a Subtrust (using the Rollover IRA and Success Co.) to purchase a $1.5 million life insurance policy. The entire $62,187 annual premium will be paid out of plan funds (it won’t cost Joe a penny), and because of the subtrust, none of the $1.5 million ultimate policy proceeds will be included in Joe’s estate.

Appropriate language in Joe’s death documents (will and revocable trust) makes sure Joe’s “goal” will be accomplished; the $1.5 million in tax-free insurance makes this goal easy.

The residence (worth $355,000) was transferred to a qualified personal residence trust (QPRT). The QPRT was set up in such a way that Joe could live in the residence for as long as he lived, yet it would be out of his estate.

If Joe gets hit by a bus the day after the plan described above is put in place, this “goal No. 5” (the entire $3,635,000 to the kids) will be accomplished (along with the four other goals). The longer Joe lives, the less the IRS gets and the more the kids get (in excess of the $3,635,000).

One warning: The above story does not explain all the technical details of Joe’s plan. Only work with a tax advisor who knows, understands and has worked with the strategies used for Joe.

A will and trust alone (no matter how long or how fancy) will not get the job done.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Featured, Planning | No Comments »

Turn Common Insurance Mistakes Into Tax-Free Wealth

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

It’s frustrating. Year after year, our office is asked to give a second opinion on the completed estate plans of owners of family businesses. It is rare — very rare — to analyze the estate plan (particularly the life insurance policies) of a real-life client and find that all is as it should be. Typically, we find the wrong kind of insurance. Wrong ownership. Wrong beneficiaries. Wrong tax consequences. It goes on and on.

This is a big deal. We are talking big money.

Typically, the IRS gets 50 to 55 cents out of every life-insurance dollar. Imagine owning a $1 million policy, and the IRS gets $550,000. Your family gets only $450,000. It happens all the time. A needless tax travesty.

Let’s review the three biggest mistakes business owners make concerning life insurance.

Mistake No. 1 — A corporation should never own insurance on the life of a shareholder, particularly a majority shareholder. Why? The trouble starts as soon as the shareholder dies: The policy proceeds are subject to the claims of corporate creditors.

Worse yet, if a C corporation, the proceeds can be subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT) that can steal up to 20 percent of the proceeds — and the net proceeds (after the AMT) can only get into the hands of your family by paying a second tax via a taxable dividend (ouch!).

If an S corporation, the proceeds (although not subject to the AMT) are still locked in the corporation and can only be paid out tax-free if all old C corporation surplus is first paid out as a dividend (a terrible and tax-expensive idea).

Mistake No. 2 — The life insurance policy is owned by you or your spouse. Someday the policy proceeds will be included in your estate (or your spouse’s estate). You just guaranteed the IRS a big — unnecessary — payday.

Mistake No. 3 — The policy (with cash surrender value) is old and the cash surrender value is half or more of the death benefit. You no longer have a life insurance policy but a lousy investment.

So what should you do? Here are the typical recommendations we give to our clients so that, you and your family — instead of the IRS — win the insurance tax game.

For Mistake No. 1 — Transfer the policy from the corporation to your name, paying the corporation only the amount of the cash surrender value (a tax-free transaction). Next, transfer the policy to a Wealth Creation Trust (an irrevocable life insurance trust that eliminates all income and estate taxes).

For Mistake No. 2 — Transfer the policy to a Wealth Creation Trust.

For Mistake No. 3 — If you are insurable, dump the old policy and replace it with a new policy to be owned by a Wealth Creation Trust. First, if you are married, make sure that replacing the policy on your life is the right type of policy. About 80 percent of the time a second-to-die policy (insures you and your spouse) will give you significantly more bang for your insurance premium dollar. Second, determine how to reduce the premium cost:

(1) if your company has a 401(k) or other qualified plan look into a “Subtrust.” The plan, not you, pays the premiums. Even your IRAs — traditional or rollover — can join in the premium-saving fun.

(2) Whether you need single life (only you are insured) or second-to-die, check out “premium financing.” You don’t pay any premiums to get a large ($5 million or more) amount of insurance, nor do you pay interest, just the low fees to the bank to initiate and maintain the loan.

This article does not even begin to explore all of the economic possibilities and tax tricks that you should learn to win the insurance tax game. Also, there are exceptions and traps, but simple to avoid when you know the tax ropes.

Here’s an easy way to get started: List the policies on your life and your spouse’s life, whether owned by you, your corporation, a trust or otherwise. Then ask this question about each policy: What is the ultimate tax cost-income and estate-while I’m alive? … When I die? … When my spouse dies?

The answer should be zero. If not, do what is necessary to make the answer zero. This usually means implementing one or more of the recommendations listed above for each of the above mistakes.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, Insurance, Planning | No Comments »

Retiring? How To Keep Getting Income From Your Business

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Joe, a reader of this column, founded a family business, Success, Inc., that he headed for 24 years. His son, Bill, has been running the business for about six years.

He’s doing a good job too. Joe, age 64, has cut back his work time to three to four hours a day for nine months of the year. The other three months are spent in a warm climate (mostly Florida) or traveling.

As Success grew over the years, Joe took only enough salary to maintain his family’s lifestyle. Simple put, profits were not taken out of Success, but reinvested. The business is still profitable, and it’s Joe’s only source of income. Success is a C corporation (tax paying).

In the past, Joe had taken a rather modest salary during the year, but he took a big bonus (when profits were available) to fund large family cash requirements (college, vacations, condo, etc.). His professionals had advised him to continue this compensation practice — the same salary and bonus arrangement — even though Joe was putting in about one-third of the time of prior years. Joe called me to get a second opinion.

The IRS would probably attack Joe’s current compensation arrangement on two fronts: First, the bonus would be regarded as a dividend, because it’s not taken until after the end of the year when the amount of the profit could be determined; and second, the salary would be regarded as unreasonable (too high) compensation.

Would the IRS win? On the first attack, Joe and the business wouldn’t stand a chance. The IRS would win hands down with the result being a nondeductible dividend for Success, and a taxable dividend for Joe. Second, the IRS could probably knock out about half of Joe’s current salary as being too high for services actually rendered. Unfortunately the (unreasonable) salary issue is tough to pin down (when challenged by the IRS) with any certainty.

What should Joe do? He needs the current income to live. The answer is to kill the C corporation and elect S corporation status. This would automatically remove the unreasonable compensation problem. What about the bonus? As an S corporation, Joe could take a tax-free dividend from Success (up to the amount of S corporation profits). This means that Success’ profits would only be taxed once when taken as an S corporation dividend, instead of twice, when taken from a C corporation as a dividend. A big tax saving! Better yet, the same trick will continue to work when Joe completely retires (take those delightful tax-free dividends).

One more thing: S corporation dividends (the economic equivalent of a bonus to Joe) are not subject to Social Security tax or other payroll taxes … another big tax saving. And here’s an extra bonus: Joe can collect Social Security benefits even if he continues to work for Success.

If you’re not tuned into the many advantages of electing S corporation status, you owe it to yourself to get the true tax facts. So, to be or not to be an S corporation? That is the question.

In practice, many factors can impact your decision. Still have doubts? Call Irv (417-9732) and I’ll walk you through to the right C or S decision.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Beware of Johnny-One-Note estate planning

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Writing this column is fun.

Even more fun is consulting with column readers to solve their real-life family and tax problems.

When a reader consults with me, I ask him/her to send some basic data, including a copy of their current estate plan. Recently, a small parade of readers have asked me to review — or give a second opinion on — what I call “Johnny-one-note estate planning.”

If your estate plan is done or is in the process of being done, the rest of this item is “must” reading. Estate plans that are built around one main theme (Johnny-one-note) do not play well in the complex world of dozens of concepts available to eliminate the estate tax.

Of the last 31 plans I have reviewed, 26 were based on a single theme. The runaway winner (really a loser in tax-saving effectiveness) is the creation of a revocable trust (RT) — one for him and one for her, where a married couple is involved.

An RT for married folks is a good start to an estate plan, but its only good tax trick is to defer the big estate tax bite until the death of the second spouse.

Two other strategies that I see regularly as Johnny-one-notes are the sale of a business to the kids by the business-owner dad (SALE) and family limited partnerships (FLIPs).

A SALE is often used as a strategy to sell your business to your kids (usually on an installment basis). Never, but never, have I seen a sale of a family-owned business as a tax-effective way to transfer a business to the next generation. Instead, take a look at an intentionally defective trust (IDT), which is the best way to transfer a business tax-free from Dad/Mom to the business kids.

A FLIP is usually not an effective way to deal with a business, a residence, or money in an IRA, profit-sharing plan or similar plan. But it’s a wonderful tax-saving starting point for almost every other asset you might own (stocks, bonds, real estate, you name it.) Properly used, you can 97-26(2) control the assets for life, protect them from the claims of creditors, and reduce their value for estate tax purposes immediately by 30 percent to 40 percent.

For example, say your transfer $1.5 million of investment assets (stocks, bonds, real estate) to a FLIP. For estate tax purposes, the assets are only worth about $1 million, resulting in estate tax savings of about $250,000.

This column over the years has covered RTs, IDTs and FLIPs in detail.

One way you can tell if your estate plan is really properly done is by looking at the estate tax liability if you and your spouse get hit by that proverbial truck.

Whether the liability is $500,000, $5 million or more, your estate plan needs a second opinion.

Why?

Your target should always be to move all your wealth — intact — to your family (for example, if you’re worth $5 million, then the entire $5 million to your family; $50 million, the entire $50 million, etc.).

Following is a list of the six most common strategies we use to transfer your wealth — intact —and eliminate estate taxes. In parenthesis following each strategy is the type of assets you should own to consider the concept.

(1) Qualified personal residence or QPRT (residence).

(2) IDT (your family business).

(3) Subtrust (junk money and other strategies if you have a total of more than $350,000 in your IRA, profit-sharing or similar plan).

(4) Charitable remainder trust or CRT (appreciated assets, including a family business) Briefly, a CRT eliminates the capital gains tax and estate tax.

(5) FLIP (for all assets not list above, generally income producing investments).

(6) Irrevocable life insurance trust or ILIT (insurance is estate tax free to you and your spouse). Use other assets to pay premiums at little or no tax cost.

(7) Premium financing (allows you to buy insurance without paying premiums in cash).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Planning, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Business appraisal protects your family from unnecessary taxation.

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

Do you know how to make a grown man cry? Tell him his business has been destroyed by fire, flood or an act of God.

Yes, a tragedy. Bad stuff. But, most likely, the loss was insured — a bit of help. It’s even more important if Joe Owner is there on the scene to assess the damage, make plans and start rebuilding. Chances are he will make the business bigger and better than before.

End of Scene 1.

Here is Scene 2. Even the most successful, egotistical and immortal business owner knows that some day he must go to the “big business in the sky.” That will not make Joe Owner cry. He is too realistic for that. But tell him that after he is gone, his present plans, or better yet — lack of a plan — mean the Internal Revenue Service will dismantle his business.

Imagine our departed Joe in heaven; sitting on a cloud; talking to a representative of the revenue service. Joe speaks first.

“Why?” he asks.

“To pay taxes,” answers the tax representative.

“How?” he asks.

“By selling off the assets necessary to pay the tax.”

“When?” he asks.

“Within two years.”

“Why?” Joe demands.

“To pay your federal estate tax liability.”

“How much?” he queries.

“That depends on the value of your business.”

“Good,” says Joe. “I can show you just how little the business is worth without me.”

“Sorry,” responds the IRS representative. “It’s too late for that now.”

The curtain goes down.

Welcome back to earth. Is the above scenario realistic? Yes.

Crazy as it sounds.

If you own a closely held business and don’t pin down its value for tax purposes while you are alive, you are setting yourself up to be mugged by the IRS.

Every business — like it or not — must some day be valued for tax purposes. It is best for it to be done voluntarily, by you (the owner) during life. If not, the valuation will be done in an involuntary situation, after death, by the revenue service.

The only “out” is to sell the business in a real transaction during your life. For most business owners, selling doesn’t make sense for many reasons.

The two most common reasons are: First, the typical business owner wants to transfer the business to his or her kids; or second, wants to keep on working until he or she goes to business heaven.

The message should be clear: Want to save your business and your family untold aggravation, not to mention savings of 55 percent, the highest estate tax bracket in 2011? Then do three things: Find out the value of your business for tax purposes by getting an appraisal. Put a transfer plan, usually to your kids, in place during your life.

And then dovetail the first two steps with your estate plan.

Done right, you can transfer your business to your kids tax-free during your life, beat the estate tax collector legally, and control your business for as long as you live.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, General Tax Strategies, Insurance, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Plan wisely to accomplish goals for your estate, before it’s too late!

Friday, March 27th, 2009

The facts, problems and solutions of this article are so typical of the readers of this column who call me for help, that I felt compelled to write about it.

Read slowly, chances are you will see some of yourself or someone you know.

Joe, 74, owns 52 percent of an S corporation (Success Co.), and each of his three children owns 16 percent of Success Co.

He has two boys, Tom, 47, and Dick, 43, who have been in business with Joe since they graduated from college. Joe’s daughter Harriet was not and never will be involved in the business. Joe lost his first and only wife last year.

Following is a list of Joe’s assets:

Various liquid investments — $190,000

52 percent of Success Co. — $1,630,000

Real estate leased to Success Co. — $600,000

Balance in Rollover IRA — $780,000

Residence and summer home — $435,000

TOTAL — $3,635,000

Joe’s lawyer (an estate planning expert with a fine reputation), who just completed Joe’s estate plan, correctly computed the estate tax (using 2011 rates) at $1,419,771. His only recommendation: Buy $1.5 million in insurance to pay the tax.

Joe called me for a second opinion. After a long telephone conference, Joe spelled out his goals:

• Control Success Co. (and the rest of his assets) for as long as he lives

• When he is gone, to have Success Co. owned 50 percent each by Tom and Dick

• Make sure he can maintain his lifestyle for as long as he lives

The dollar value that Harriet receives from Joe’s estate should be equal to the amount received by each of her brothers.

Find a way to have each of his kids receive one-third of what he is worth now, all taxes paid in full. (Joe laughed a bit at this goal; he didn’t think it was possible).

Stop for a moment. Substitute your own list of assets and goals (remember, if you are married, some day either you or your spouse will be the first to pass on). What follows is the plan we implemented for Joe and the strategies we selected to accomplish Joe’s five specific goals (in the same order as the goals).

We recapitalized Success Co. (a tax-free transaction) so Joe now owned 52 percent of the controlling voting stock (52 of 100 shares) and 52 percent of the nonvoting stock (5,200 of 10,000 shares).

We transferred the liquid investments and the real estate to a family limited partnership (FLIP). As the general partner (owned 1 percent of the FLIP), Joe kept control of these assets.

He will make annual gifts ($12,000 each) of limited partnership interests to the kids.

These limited interest (99 percent of the FLIP) have no voting rights and are entitled to significant discounts (about 35%) for tax purposes. As a result, Joe can give about $19,000 to each kid of limited FLIP interests every year, yet for tax purposes the interests are only worth $12,000.

Joe sold the 5,200 shares of nonvoting stock to a so-called defective trust (defective for income tax purposes) for $1.5 million plus interest. The trust paid for the stock with a note.

Success Co. will distribute S Corporation dividends each year to the trust, which will then pay off the note to Joe.

The beneficiaries of the trust are Tom and Dick who will each own half of the 5,200 shares when the note is fully paid and the trust terminates.

Joe’s 52 voting shares will go to Tom and Dick when Joe dies.

The shares owned by sister Harriet will be redeemed by Success Co., according to a new buy/sell agreement, when Joe passes on. Then Tom and Dick will each own 50 percent of Success Co.

Joe’s flow of cash to maintain his lifestyle would come from many sources. (a) a small salary from Success Co., plus all of his usual perks; (b) The note payments from the trust (the entire $1.5 million plus the interest is tax-free to Joe because of the defective trust); and (c) distributions from the rollover IRA. Actually during the years (about 8 to 10) while the note is being paid off, Joe will have more cash than he needs to live. This excess cash will be put into the FLIP (and, of course, will be available for distribution in future years). Actually, all the assets of the FLIP will be available to Joe if needed.

As a final back up, Joe will enter into a death benefit agreement with Success Co., that will pay Joe $75,000 per year starting when Joe retires (probably never) and continuing until the day he dies.

We created a Subtrust (using the Rollover IRA and Success Co.) to purchase a $1.5 million life insurance policy. The entire $62,187 annual premium will be paid out of plan funds (it won’t cost Joe a penny), and because of the subtrust none of the $1.5 million ultimate policy proceeds will be included in Joe’s estate.

Appropriate language in Joe’s death documents (will and revocable trust) makes sure Joe’s “goal” will be accomplished; the $1.5 million in tax-free insurance makes this goal easy.The residence (worth $355,000) was transferred to a qualified personal residence trust (QPRT).

The QPRT was set up in such a way that Joe could live in the residence for as long as he lived, yet it would be out of his estate.

If Joe gets hit by a bus the day after the plan described above is put in place, this “goal 5″ (the entire $3,635,000 to the kids) will be accomplished (along with the four other goals). The longer Joe lives, the less the IRS gets and the more the kids get (in excess of the $3,635,000).

One warning: The above story does not explain all the technical details of Joe’s plan.

Only work with a tax advisor that knows, understands and has worked with the strategies used for Joe. A will and trust alone (no matter how long or how fancy) will not get the job done. (All your wealth to future generations, while totally eliminating the impact of the estate tax.)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Planning, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Beyond the ‘C’: Use S corporation to buy or transfer a business.

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

A reader of this site — let’s call him Joe — asked his CPA to call me to get a second opinion.

Here’s the story the CPA told me:

Joe was about to buy the stock of a C corporation for $2.2 million payable over eight years plus interest at prime, all evidenced by a note. In addition, another $600,000 was to be paid by the C corporation to be divided between a covenant not to compete (for three years starting immediately) and a consulting contract (the CPA was not sure that the seller was really going to consult) to the seller for three years. The idea was to make the $600,000 deductible as paid.

Joe intended to get the money to pay the principal and interest on the $1.2 million note by taking a bonus twice a year when the note payments became due.

Fortunately, the CPA called before any papers were signed. Without getting into every nook and cranny of the proposed transaction, here is a list of the most obvious tax blunders that would have befallen Joe and his C corporation.

– The bonuses to Joe almost certainly would have been attacked by the IRS as unreasonable compensation (Joe intended to take $250,000 to $275,000 as regular compensation, plus the bonuses).

– The interest to be paid by Joe is considered investment interest, which is deductible only to offset investment income (Joe had none). In effect, all of that beautiful interest would have been nondeductible.

– An employee or consultant already has a duty not to compete. Paying the seller for consulting is OK (assuming the amount is reasonable). So if the seller actually worked and got reasonable compensation, it would be deductible. On the other hand, if the seller really did not consult, none of the consulting payments is deductible. In any event, the amount of the covenant is not deductible over the three-year payment or not-to-compete period; instead, it can be written off only over 15 years.

Again, without attempting to cover every detail, here is how the transaction will be done:

– Joe will elect S corporation status. Now Joe can take tax-free S corporation dividends to pay the note. The interest, because of the S corporation status, is now deductible on Joe’s personal tax return as a business expense. The unreasonable-compensation problem is eliminated.

– The interest rate will be raised to two points over prime and reduce the covenant amount dollar for dollar. The consulting contract will run for only the period of time that the seller actually consults, and that will be paid for same. After the consulting period is over, the covenant not to compete will kick in.

One warning: Whether you’re buying or selling a business, work only with experienced and knowledgeable professionals. Pretend you’re having a heart transplant, and seek out the best professional help you can find. If you are selling your S corporation to one of your kids, he or she can deduct the interest (see Letter Ruling 9215013).

An S corporation is almost always the best route when you are transferring — by sale or otherwise — your business to your kids.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax | No Comments »