Posts Tagged ‘marital deduction’

Most Estate Plans Enrich The IRS, Not Your Family

Friday, April 17th, 2009

While scanning the pages of one of the trade journals that carries this tax column, a headline for an ad intrigued me: “We install 90 percent of what we sell. That’s one big advantage we have over (names one of the biggest square-footage discount chains).”

Here’s the sad routine when the gizmo doesn’t work:

“The manufacturers,” pleads the installer.

“Improperly installed,” counters the manufacturer.

Ultimately — after some grief and unnecessary dollars —the gizmo is fixed and it works.

Now, there’s a game you don’t want to play with your estate plan. Try this real-life story of a tax disaster.

Joe died, survived by his wife Mary, four grown kids (one, Sam, managed Joe’s family business, Success Co.) and seven grandchildren. Success Co. was a C corporation. Aside from owning their residence (worth $800,000) and Success Co. (valued at $9.8 million at Joe’s death), Joe and Mary had $275,000 of spendable personal wealth. In addition, they owned various personal property and a nice summer home with a total value of $1.2 million.

About five years before he died, Joe had gathered a team of professionals to do his estate plan: his CPA, a lawyer who specialized in estate planning, and his long-time friend, an insurance agent.

The professionals crafted a great traditional estate plan: no tax due at Joe’s death (the 100 percent marital deduction) and enough insurance (second-to-die) to pay the projected estate tax at Mary’s death. An irrevocable life insurance trust owned the second-to-die policy on Joe’s and Mary’s lives. The estate plan probably would get an A-plus in the classroom.

But here are the unfortunate little lifetime details — told to me by Sam in an urgent phone call the professional team missed:

Mary, a healthy age 65, did not have a flow of income or enough spendable assets to maintain her lifestyle. Joe’s $500,000 salary, plus generous perks from Success Co., stopped when he died. Aside from the usual lifestyle cash needs, Mary needed $46,000 per year to pay the second-to-die insurance premium. Also, she wanted to continue providing the college education for four of her grandchildren( the other three had completed their education, which was paid for by Joe and Mary).

None of the professionals accepted responsibility for Mary’s lack of spendable income. Worse yet, they had no suggestions to solve the problem.

First, the solution to Mary’s immediate problem: The marital trust (created in Joe’s revocable trust as part of his estate plan) owned 85 percent of Success Co. (Mary owned the other 15 percent). We simply had the stockholders (the marital trust and Mary) elect S Corporation status for Success Co. The large corporate profit will easily provide the income stream-via S corporation dividends-she needs, as the beneficiary of the marital trust (85 percent) and as a direct owner (15 percent).

Now, what lesson should be learned from this sad tale?

The first lesson is that estate planning (as practiced all over the United States) is really death planning. Do the documents: a will and a trust or two, put ’em in the vault, and wait to die.

Rather than rehash what should have been done for Joe and Mary, let’s get the first lesson up on the board — loud and clear.

Whether you call it estate planning, lifetime planning, wealth transfer planning or whatever, your master plan must include three separate plans: (1) a lifetime plan to transfer your wealth while you are alive (and, yes you can control your wealth for as long as you live); (2) a retirement plan that provides the after-tax cash flow needed to maintain your lifestyle for you and your spouse for as long as either one of you lives; and (3) a transfer/succession plan for your business. (Note: Not even one of these three was done by the typical traditional estate plan for Joe and Mary.)

If you have yet to do your master plan, make sure it includes the three plans listed above. If your master plan is done and does not include all three of the plans listed above, get a second opinion. And finally, make sure that the professionals who create your plan know in advance that they are responsible for all aspects; he who creates the plan should install it and monitor it to the day you (and your spouse) die.

Remember, just because your estate plan is done, does not mean it is done right. Wouldn’t you want your plan to be in the 10 percent that enriches your family, instead of the 90 percent with a plan that enriches the IRS?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Featured, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Why Your Estate Tax Plan Often Flunks The Real-Life Test

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

While thumbing through the pages of a trade journal, I ran across this quote, “We install 90 percent of what we sell. That’s one big advantage we have over (names one of the biggest square-footage discount chains).”

You know the routine: the thing-a-ma-jig doesn’t work. “The manufacturer,” says the installer; “improperly installed,” counters the manufacturer.

Ultimately-after some grief and probably more dollars — and it works.

Now, there’s a game you don’t want to play with your estate plan. Try this real-life tax horror story.

Joe died, survived by his wife, Mary, three grown kids (one managed Joe’s family business, Success Co.) and seven grandchildren. Success Co. was a C corporation. Aside from owning their residence (worth $800,000) and Success Co. (valued at $10.3 million at Joe’s death), before Joe died, he and Mary enjoyed about $350,000 of after-tax spendable personal income. In addition, they owned various personal property and a nice summer home with a total value of over $1 million.

About five years before he died, Joe gathered a team of professionals to do his estate plan: his CPA, a lawyer who specialized in estate planning and his long-time friend, an insurance agent.

The professionals crafted a good traditional estate plan: no tax due at Joe’s death (the marital deduction) and enough insurance (second-to-die) to pay the projected estate tax at Mary’s death. An irrevocable life insurance trust owned the second-to-die policy on Joe’s and Mary’s lives.

The estate plan probably would get an “A” in the classroom. But here’s the unfortunate big lifetime detail the professional team missed:

Mary, a healthy age 64, did not have enough cash flow to maintain her lifestyle. Joe’s $550,000 salary, plus generous perks from Success Co., stopped when he died.

Aside from the usual lifestyle cash needs, Mary needed $46,000 per year to pay the second-to-die insurance premium. Also, she wanted to continue providing for the college education of three of her grandchildren (the other five had completed their education paid for by Joe and Mary).

None of the professionals accepted responsibility for Mary’s lack of necessary spendable income. Worse yet, they had no suggestions to solve the problem.

First, the solution to Mary’s immediate problem: the cash flow to maintain her lifestyle. The marital trust (created in Joe’s revocable trust as part of his estate plan) owned 90 percent of Success Co. (Mary owned the other 10 percent). We simply had the stockholders (the marital trust and Mary) elect S Corporation status for Success Co.

Now the large corporate profit can provide the income stream Mary needs, as the beneficiary of the marital trust (90 percent) and as a direct owner (10 percent).

What lesson should be learned from this sad tale? The first lesson is that estate planning (as practiced all over the United States) is really death planning, put ’em in the vault and wait to die. Do the documents (a will and a trust or two).

Rather than rehash what should have been done for Joe and Mary, let’s get the first lesson up on the board — loud and clear.

Whether you call it estate planning, lifetime planning, wealth transfer planning or whatever, your master plan must include three separate plans:

(1) a lifetime plan to transfer your wealth while you are alive (and, yes you can control your wealth for as long as you live);

(2) a retirement plan that provides the after-tax cash flow needed to maintain your lifestyle for you (and your spouse) for as long as you (or your spouse) live;

(3) a transfer/succession plan for your business (that gets the value of the business out of your estate tax-free) to your business kids (or other successor).

Whether your master plan is done or is yet to be done, make sure it includes the three plans listed above. And always get an independent second opinion.

Finally, make sure that the professionals who create your plan know in advance they are responsible for all aspects: he who creates the plan should install it and monitor it to the day you (and your spouse) die.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Why Your Real Estate Plan Often Flunks The Real-Life Test

Monday, April 13th, 2009

While thumbing through the pages of a trade journal, I ran across this quote, “We install 90 percent of what we sell. That’s one big advantage we have over (names one of the biggest square-footage discount chains).”

You know the routine: the thing-a-ma-jig doesn’t work.

“The manufacturer,” says the installer.

“Improperly installed,” counters the manufacturer.

Ultimately — after some grief and probably more dollars — it works.

Now, there’s a game you don’t want to play with your estate plan. Try this real-life tax horror story.Joe died, survived by his wife Mary, three grown kids (one managed Joe’s family business, Success Co.) and seven grandchildren. Success Co. was a C corporation. Aside from owning their residence (worth $800,000) and Success Co. (valued at $10.3 million at Joe’s death), before Joe died, he and Mary enjoyed about $350,000 of after-tax spendable personal income.

In addition, they owned various personal property and a nice summer home with a total value of over $1 million.About five years before he died, Joe gathered a team of professionals to do his estate plan: his CPA, a lawyer who specialized in estate planning and his long-time friend, an insurance agent.

The professionals crafted a good traditional estate plan: no tax due at Joe’s death (the marital deduction) and enough insurance (second-to-die) to pay the projected estate tax at Mary’s death. An irrevocable life insurance trust owned the second-to-die policy on Joe’s and Mary’s lives.

The estate plan probably would get an “A” in the classroom.

But here’s the unfortunate big lifetime detail the professional team missed: Mary, a healthy age 64, did not have enough cash flow to maintain her lifestyle. Joe’s $550,000 salary, plus generous perks from Success Co., stopped when he died. Aside from the usual lifestyle cash needs, Mary needed $46,000 per year to pay the second-to-die insurance premium.

Also, she wanted to continue providing for the college education of three of her grandchildren (the other five had completed their education paid for by Joe and Mary).

None of the professionals accepted responsibility for Mary’s lack of necessary spendable income. Worse yet, they had no suggestions to solve the problem.First, the solution to Mary’s immediate problem: the cash flow to maintain her lifestyle. The marital trust (created in Joe’s revocable trust as part of his estate plan) owned 90 percent of Success Co. (Mary owned the other 10 percent). We simply had the stockholders (the marital trust and Mary) elect S Corporation status for Success Co. Now the large corporate profit can provide the income stream Mary needs, as the beneficiary of the marital trust (90 percent) and as a direct owner (10 percent).

What lesson should be learned from this sad tale?

The first lesson is that estate planning (as practiced all over the United States) is really death planning. Do the documents — a will and a trust or two, put ‘em in the vault, and wait to die.

Rather than rehash what should have been done for Joe and Mary, let’s get the first lesson up on the board — loud and clear:

Whether you call it estate planning, lifetime planning, wealth transfer planning or whatever, your master plan must include three separate plans: (1) a lifetime plan to transfer your wealth while you are alive (and, yes you can control your wealth for as long as you live); (2) a retirement plan that provides the after-tax cash flow needed to maintain your lifestyle for you (and your spouse) for as long as you (or your spouse) live; and (3) a transfer/succession plan for your business (that gets the value of the business out of your estate tax-free) to your business kids (or other successor).

Whether your master plan is done or is yet to be done, make sure it includes the three plans listed above. And always — I mean always — get an independent second opinion. And finally, make sure that the professionals who create your plan know in advance that they are responsible for all aspects: he who creates the plan should install it and monitor it to the day the you (and your spouse) die.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, General Tax Strategies, General Tax Talk | No Comments »

Don’t Get Stuck In These IRS Tax Traps

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

If you own a business and your estate plan uses or intends to use any of the four commonly used techniques (actually tax traps) discussed in this article, you will unnecessarily enrich the IRS.

Guaranteed!

Let’s set-up the typical family-business situation we see at least 100 times every year. Joe, who is married to Mary, owns Success Co. Sam, their son, runs the business and someday will replace Joe. They have other children who are not active in the business.

The traps are listed here in order of the most serious and most frequent blunder.

The marital deduction. After Joe’s death, Mary will own Success Co. or a large portion of it in her own name or in some kind of marital trust. That’s great, when Joe dies. No estate tax. But when Mary goes, the IRS gets its pound of flesh. Remember, the marital deduction only defers tax; it’s not intended to be a tax saver.

A Section 303 redemption. Success Co. can redeem as much of Joe’s stock as necessary, free of any income or capital- gains tax to pay Joe’s (or Mary’s) death taxes and other estate costs. Sounds good. But the fact is, the money that comes out of Success Co. goes straight to the IRS.

Section 6166. Because Success Co. is a major asset in Joe’s (or Mary’s) estate, the estate tax can be paid in installments for up to 15 years with interest at a very low rate. Not only does the IRS get the estate tax, it now gets (even though a low percentage) interest to boot.

Normally this column tells you what to do to win the tax game, as opposed to telling you what not to do. OK, then. Here’s what you must do to check your estate plan and know it’s right for you and your family:

• The strategies you use must be initiated during your life (such as gifts, a grantor retained annuity trust or a family limited partnership), not at death (the three traps described in this article).

• When the entire plan is in place, your advisor should show you clearly that your total wealth will go to your family without being reduced in value by even one dime of estate taxes.

• Your advisor must get you into some kind of tax-free environment, such as an irrevocable life-insurance trust or some kind of charitable trust, immediately.

• You control your assets for as long as you live (or at least as long as you want) with the use of voting/nonvoting stock, a family limited partnership or various trusts.

• Finally, your assets are protected from creditors and lawsuits.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies, Insurance | No Comments »

A Review of Gift-Tax Rules to Enchance Your Family’s Wealth

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Applause! Applause!

Congress in 1998 buried an old and onerous gift-tax killer rule. Yet few people are aware of the tax-saving advantages of the new law.

First, some background. Gifts to your spouse are sheltered by an unlimited marital deduction, no matter how much the gift — during life or at death — there is no gift tax or estate tax. For lifetime gifts to all other individuals, the first $12,000 ($24,000 if married) is also exempt from tax.

A gift-tax return is generally not required for gifts qualifying for the marital deduction. On the other hand, a gift-tax return must be filed for all gifts in excess of $12,000 per donee (the person receiving the gift) per year.

Just like your income-tax return, your gift-tax return is due on April 15. For example, taxable gifts made in 2005 should have been reported on a gift-tax return filed by April 15, 2006. The IRS has three years from the date a gift-tax return is filed to make a gift-tax assessment. So, if the IRS decides four years down the road that a gift was worth more than the value shown on your timely filed gift-tax return, it’s out of luck. The IRS cannot assess any additional tax on the gift.

In the past, there was a catch.

Again, some background. The estate and gift taxes are unified so that a single graduated rate schedule applies to cumulative lifetime and death transfers. As a result, the final tax on your estate depends on the amount of taxable gifts made during your life.

The more lifetime taxable gifts, the higher your estate tax.

Sad but true, the courts allowed the IRS to revalue gifts — even after death — in order to determine the decedent’s estate tax. While it was too late to assess additional gift taxes on the gift (because the three-year time period had run out), the revalued gift could bump the estate into a higher tax bracket and cost — often huge — additional estate-tax dollars.

If the IRS claimed that a lifetime gift — very often the stock of a family business — was seriously undervalued, the tax on the estate would skyrocket. The estate had a tough time proving that a business valuation made years earlier (5, 10, 15 years or more) was and is still correct.

OK, let’s hear the drumroll for the new law:

For gifts made after Aug. 5, 1997, the IRS can no longer revalue lifetime gifts for estate-tax purposes. You must only jump through one hoop: report the gift on a gift-tax return. The value of the gift must be shown on the return or disclosed on the return or an attachment in a manner adequate to disclose to the IRS the nature of the gift.

After three years, the IRS (and you) are bound by the values shown on the return.

The door is, however, still open for the IRS to revalue some gifts:

• Any gift made prior to Aug. 6, 1997;

• A gift-tax return is filed, but the gifts are not properly disclosed or reported;

• Gifts not shown on a return;

• No gift tax return was filed because you thought the gift was worth $12,000 or less.

Here’s what to do for absolute protection:

Except for cash gifts under $12,000, report all gifts — particularly gifts involving the stock or an interest in any kind of family business or partnership — on a timely filed gift-tax return.

The more you are worth, the more your estate plan should include a well-thought-out lifetime plan, which includes a gifting program to the next generation.

Generally, cash gifts are a no-no. Leveraged gifts (usually involving a family limited partnership (FLIP), intentionally defective trust (IDT) or one or more of the dozens of life insurance strategies, are smart. They beat up the IRS legally and keep you in control of the gifted assets for as long as you live.

Gifting (using an FLIP, IDT or life insurance) is only one of 22 strategies used to legally avoid the estate tax. Learn how and when to use all the strategies —whether you are worth $2 million or $20 million.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies, Insurance | No Comments »

Please write a check to the IRS for $3,167,000

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Through the years, our office has listened to an endless stream of taxpayers complain about the income tax.

But if you ever want to see anger, frustration and bitterness, meet with the beneficiaries (usually the kids) of an estate when they are told to write a seven- or eight-figure check to the IRS — for estate taxes.

Taxes that could have been avoided with proper planning.

Tragic!

A recent post-death estate planning consultation got us thinking about what you are now reading. Yes, the estate tax was exactly $3,167,000 after Mom died; Dad had died six years earlier. The really sad part of this story is that Dad’s and Mom’s entire estate tax liability could have been legally avoided with a rather simple estate plan.

Mom and Dad were survived by three kids and eight grandchildren. The business that Dad started back in the mid-50s was worth $4.5 million and owned 100 percent by Mom when she died.

According to Dad’s estate tax return, the business, which he left to Mom, was worth $2.9 million when he died. No estate tax (because of the marital deduction) was paid when Dad died.

Dad and Mom had a typical estate plan: a will and a trust. The trust created two trusts: one trust to take advantage of passing $1 million tax-free (the amount that was tax-free when Dad died) and a second trust to capture the marital deduction.

The tax-free amount is $2 million in 2006, rising to $3.5 million in 2009 and back to $1 million in 2011.

There is no estate tax if you die in 2010. I’m betting Congress will change these amounts before 2010 (or sooner).

The real answer (to why many people procrastinate and don’t complete a comprehensive estate plan during their life) is the deceased person whose estate caused the tax did not have to personally write that big check to the IRS.

Whenever we are about to plan an estate, we estimate the amount of estate tax that ultimately will be due.

Then we ask the client to write a check to the IRS for that amount. The client always gets the point. Then, we plan the estate so the client’s wealth goes to their family, instead of the IRS.

The plan must be a lifetime plan, that implements the proper strategies, as necessary, during your life. A plan contained in the typical will and trust-like Mom’s and Dad’s above-only enriches the IRS.

The person (your executor) who must write the check to pay your estate tax is helpless when it comes to minimizing or eliminating the estate tax. Only you, while you are alive, can eliminate the estate tax… by creating the proper comprehensive estate plan.

Here are the three things you can do to drive the estate-tax devil away:

(1) Learn all you can (this column is a good start);

(2) No matter what your age, put a complete estate plan into place now (then monitor it every two to four years);

(3) Only work with experienced professionals who can show you how to pass all your wealth — intact —to your family (if you are not sure, get a second opinion).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies | No Comments »