Posts Tagged ‘Insurance’

« Older Entries

Yes, you can beat the estate tax, legally, and easily

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

If you use the right tax tools and techniques together with the right professionals (lawyer, insurance consultant, and CPA), you can and will develop a plan to beat the IRS. Every time. And legally.
Unfortunately, the goal of the typical estate planner is to reduce estate taxes. Our goal is always the same: eliminate the robber-like estate tax.
There are three types of readers of this column that call me for help: The reader who (1) has an estate plan but needs a second opinion, (2) has no plan, or (3) has been working on a plan for years and just can’t seem to get it done. Which type are you?…. Write your answer here ____________.
You might be interested in knowing that no matter which type you are, you have lots of company. Here are the percentages: (1) need a second opinion – 55%; (2) no plan – 15%; (3) working on a plan, can’t get it done – 30%.
Following is a real-life, second-opinion plan that should help you no matter which category you happen to be in: A 61-year old from Ohio, who winters in Florida, (let’s call him Joe) falls into the first opinion category. Joe’s letter says in part: “I… enclosed all the information… you asked for. My current plan [it was two short wills and two long revocable trusts. One of each for Joe: the others for his wife Mary] looks good… but somehow I don’t feel comfortable… So request… a second opinion.”
Joe and Mary turned out to be a very interesting case, yet, sadly and as is often the case, contains some common estate plan errors. Sure, their documents – wills and trusts – were near perfect. Problem is they just didn’t work. Let’s see why. Joe and Mary are worth just over $8 million, plus Joe has a number of life insurance policies totaling $2.7 million on his life that name Mary as the beneficiary. The $8 million includes $1.9 million in Joe’s rollover IRA with Mary as beneficiary. The balance of the assets ($6.1 million) – Joe’s business, their Ohio and Florida residences, some rental real estate and other investments – are all held in joint tenancy by Joe and Mary.
The wills and trusts – 46 pages in total – were designed by a large law firm to pass Joe’s and Mary’s assets in a highly organized plan, first to the survivor of Joe and Mary and then to their children and grandchildren. Because Joe is 4 years older than Mary (and females outlive males by about 4 years), it was assumed that Joe would pass on first.
Okay, suppose Joe goes to heaven first in 2009. Everything, and we mean everything (because of the joint tenancy) would go directly to Mary. Joe’s trust would get nothing and be a worthless stack of papers. Mary would get her $2.7 million in insurance. For the same reason – named beneficiary – Mary gets the $1.9 million in the IRA. What about the other assets – worth $6.1 million? All to Mary immediately. Let me repeat: because property held in joint tenancy goes to the survivor.
It should be pointed out that if Mary had died the day after Joe, the tax bite would have exceeded $3.1 million (using current 2009 estate tax rates, top rate of 45%) on the $10.7 million now owned by Mary. Their kids would net only about $7.6 million.
What’s the lesson to be learned from this second opinion story: a will and a revocable trust – no matter how terrific – standing alone can never be a complete estate plan.
We used a number of strategies to change Joe’s and Mary’s estate plan: (1) a qualified personal residence trust for the residences, (2) an intentionally defective trust to transfer Joe’s business to the kids…Tax-free, (3) an irrevocable trust for the insurance, (4) retirement plan rescue for the IRA to pay for the additional life insurance needed, (5) a family limited partnership
to hold the balance (real estate and investments) of their assets, and (6) an organized future-gift-giving program to their children and grandchildren. With minor changes, the original wills and trust were left alone.
Important Note: I predict that Congress will (before December 31, 2009), amend the estate tax law to make the first $3.5 million of your taxable estate tax-free. So for a married couple, $7 million can escape the estate tax monster.
After the above strategies and completed plans are put in place, if Joe and Mary get hit by the same bus, the kids would net, after taxes, about $11.2 million (includes the additional life insurance in strategy (4) above). The longer Joe and Mary live, as the future-gifting program – over time – is implemented, the more tax-free dollars will be transferred to the kids.
If you would like a second opinion on your current estate plan, please send the following information:
1. For Your Business. Your last year-end financial statement (all pages).
2. Personal. A current personal financial statement for you and your spouse.
3. A family tree. Your name and birthday. Same for your spouse, children, children’s spouses and your grandchildren.
4. Documents. Hold them for now. We will request them at a later date.
5. All phone numbers where you can be reached: business, home, cell.
Send to Irv Blackman, SECOND OPINION, 4545 W. Touhy Avenue, Lincolnwood, IL 60712. What’s our job?… To create the right plan for you, your family, and your business… and to coordinate and work with your professionals. If you have a question call Irv at 847-674-5295.
Okay, that’s the plan. Let’s hear from you.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, Featured | No Comments »

Yes, It’s OK To Beat Up The IRS — Legally, Of Course!

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

The facts, problems and solutions of this article are so typical of the readers of this column who call me for help, that I felt compelled to write about it.

Read slowly, chances are you will see some of yourself or someone you know.

Joe (age 74) owns 52 percent of an S corporation (Success Co.), and each of his three children owns 16 percent of Success Co. He has two boys, Tom (47) and Dick (43), who have been in business with Joe since they graduated from college.

Joe’s daughter, Harriet, was not and never will be involved in the business. Joe lost his first and only wife last year.

Following is a list of Joe’s assets:

• Various liquid investments:$190,000

• 52 percent of Success Co.: $1,630,000

• Real estate leased to Success Co.: $600,000

• Balance in Rollover IRA: $780,000

• Residence and summer home: $435,000

• Total: $3,635,000.

Joe’s lawyer (an estate planning expert with a fine reputation), who just completed Joe’s estate plan, correctly computed the estate tax (using 2011 rates) at $1,419,771. His only recommendation: Buy $1.5 million in insurance to pay the tax.

Joe called me for a second opinion. After a long telephone conference, following is how Joe spelled out his goals:

1. Control Success Co. (and the rest of his assets) for as long as he lives.

2. When he is gone, to have Success Co. owned 50 percent each by Tom and Dick.

3. Make sure he can maintain his lifestyle for as long as he lives.

4. The dollar value that Harriet receives from Joe’s estate should be equal to the amount received by each of her brothers.

5. Find a way to have each of his kids receive one-third of what he is worth now, all taxes paid in full. (Joe laughed a bit at this goal; he didn’t think it was possible).

Stop for a moment. Substitute you own list of assets and goals (remember, if you are married, some day either you or your spouse will be the first to pass on). What follows is the plan we implemented for Joe and the strategies we selected to accomplish Joe’s five specific goals (in the same order as the goals).

We recapitalized Success Co. (a tax-free transaction) so Joe now owned 52 percent of the controlling voting stock (52 of 100 shares) and 52 percent of the nonvoting stock (5,200 of 10,000 shares).

We transferred the liquid investments and the real estate to a family limited partnership (FLIP). As the general partner (owned 1 percent of the FLIP), Joe kept control of these assets. He will make annual gifts ($12,000 each) of limited partnership interests to the kids. These limited interests (99 percent of the FLIP) have no voting rights and are entitled to significant discounts (about 35 percent) for tax purposes. As a result, Joe can give about $19,000 to each kid of limited FLIP interests every year, yet for tax purposes the interests are only worth $12,000.

Joe sold the 5,200 shares of non-voting stock to a so-called defective trust (defective for income tax purposes) for $1.5 million plus interest. The trust paid for the stock with a note. Success Co. will distribute S Corporation dividends each year to the trust, which will then pay off the note to Joe.

Because the trust is defective for income tax purposes, every dime that Joe receives (both for principal to pay off the note and interest) is tax-free. The beneficiaries of the trust are Tom and Dick who will each own half of the 5,200 non-voting shares when the note is fully paid and the trust terminates.

Joe’s 52 voting shares will go to Tom and Dick when Joe dies. The shares owned by sister, Harriet, will be redeemed by Success Co., according to a new buy/sell agreement, when Joe passes on. Then Tom and Dick will each own 50 percent of Success Co.

Joe’s flow of cash to maintain his lifestyle would come from many sources. (a) a small salary from Success Co., plus all of his usual perks; (b) The note payments from the trust (remember, the entire $1.5 million plus the interest is tax-free to Joe because of the defective trust); and (c) distributions from the rollover IRA.

Actually, during the years (about eight to 10) while the note is being paid off, Joe will have more cash than he needs to live. This excess cash will be put into the FLIP (and, of course, will be available for distribution in future years).

Actually, all the assets of the FLIP will be available to Joe if needed.

As a final back up, Joe will enter into a death benefit agreement with Success Co. that will pay Joe $75,000 per year starting when Joe retires (probably never) and continuing until the day he dies.

We created a Subtrust (using the Rollover IRA and Success Co.) to purchase a $1.5 million life insurance policy. The entire $62,187 annual premium will be paid out of plan funds (it won’t cost Joe a penny), and because of the subtrust, none of the $1.5 million ultimate policy proceeds will be included in Joe’s estate.

Appropriate language in Joe’s death documents (will and revocable trust) makes sure Joe’s “goal” will be accomplished; the $1.5 million in tax-free insurance makes this goal easy.

The residence (worth $355,000) was transferred to a qualified personal residence trust (QPRT). The QPRT was set up in such a way that Joe could live in the residence for as long as he lived, yet it would be out of his estate.

If Joe gets hit by a bus the day after the plan described above is put in place, this “goal No. 5” (the entire $3,635,000 to the kids) will be accomplished (along with the four other goals). The longer Joe lives, the less the IRS gets and the more the kids get (in excess of the $3,635,000).

One warning: The above story does not explain all the technical details of Joe’s plan. Only work with a tax advisor who knows, understands and has worked with the strategies used for Joe.

A will and trust alone (no matter how long or how fancy) will not get the job done.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Featured, Planning | No Comments »

An Easy Way For The Kids To Buy Their Parents’ Stock — Tax-Free

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Do you want to transfer your business to your kids? Read this:

Mom or Dad wants to transfer the family business to one or more of the children. But the money to fund the buyout at the death of the parent/stockholder —insurance on the parent’s life — is in the wrong place.

Here’s a foolproof way of getting the job done, according to an IRS letter ruling:

The father, Joe, worked with his son, Sam, in a business founded by Joe. The stock of the corporation was owned 25 percent by Joe, 4 percent by Sam and the balance by five other children not active in the business.

Joe had two main objectives: First, to have his stock go to Sam after his death and, second, to make sure that his wife, Mary, would be financially secure for the rest of her life.

Joe and his son developed a plan to accomplish these objectives. They entered into a buy-sell agreement requiring Sam to buy his father’s shares from his estate after his death at fair market value. To fund the purchase, Sam would use the proceeds of a life insurance policy on his dad’s life.

The corporation owned the insurance policy and paid the premiums. Joe intended to buy the policy from the corporation for its cash-surrender value and gift the policy to his son. From then on, Sam would pay all premiums. Great news!

The IRS ruled that, under these conditions, Sam could collect the insurance proceeds income tax-free (IRS Letter Ruling 8906034).

There are two more tax goodies that flow as a result of this ruling.

One, when Sam buys Joe’s stock from his estate, the sale of the stock by the estate is income tax-free.

Why? Under the tax law, the estate gets a new tax basis equal to the stock’s fair market value at the date of Joe’s death.

Two, since Mary is the beneficiary of Joe’s estate, there is no estate tax. Why? An estate is entitled to a 100 percent marital deduction for all property passing to a spouse, Mary in this case.

What could be better? No income tax. No estate tax.

Sam owns 100 percent of Joe’s stock.

Mary is financially secure.

Perfect!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, Insurance | No Comments »

Please write a check to the IRS for $3,167,000

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Through the years, our office has listened to an endless stream of taxpayers complain about the income tax.

But if you ever want to see anger, frustration and bitterness, meet with the beneficiaries (usually the kids) of an estate when they are told to write a seven- or eight-figure check to the IRS — for estate taxes.

Taxes that could have been avoided with proper planning.

Tragic!

A recent post-death estate planning consultation got us thinking about what you are now reading. Yes, the estate tax was exactly $3,167,000 after Mom died; Dad had died six years earlier. The really sad part of this story is that Dad’s and Mom’s entire estate tax liability could have been legally avoided with a rather simple estate plan.

Mom and Dad were survived by three kids and eight grandchildren. The business that Dad started back in the mid-50s was worth $4.5 million and owned 100 percent by Mom when she died.

According to Dad’s estate tax return, the business, which he left to Mom, was worth $2.9 million when he died. No estate tax (because of the marital deduction) was paid when Dad died.

Dad and Mom had a typical estate plan: a will and a trust. The trust created two trusts: one trust to take advantage of passing $1 million tax-free (the amount that was tax-free when Dad died) and a second trust to capture the marital deduction.

The tax-free amount is $2 million in 2006, rising to $3.5 million in 2009 and back to $1 million in 2011.

There is no estate tax if you die in 2010. I’m betting Congress will change these amounts before 2010 (or sooner).

The real answer (to why many people procrastinate and don’t complete a comprehensive estate plan during their life) is the deceased person whose estate caused the tax did not have to personally write that big check to the IRS.

Whenever we are about to plan an estate, we estimate the amount of estate tax that ultimately will be due.

Then we ask the client to write a check to the IRS for that amount. The client always gets the point. Then, we plan the estate so the client’s wealth goes to their family, instead of the IRS.

The plan must be a lifetime plan, that implements the proper strategies, as necessary, during your life. A plan contained in the typical will and trust-like Mom’s and Dad’s above-only enriches the IRS.

The person (your executor) who must write the check to pay your estate tax is helpless when it comes to minimizing or eliminating the estate tax. Only you, while you are alive, can eliminate the estate tax… by creating the proper comprehensive estate plan.

Here are the three things you can do to drive the estate-tax devil away:

(1) Learn all you can (this column is a good start);

(2) No matter what your age, put a complete estate plan into place now (then monitor it every two to four years);

(3) Only work with experienced professionals who can show you how to pass all your wealth — intact —to your family (if you are not sure, get a second opinion).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Don’t go overboard with one kind of tax strategy

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Professionally, my second love is writing this column. My first love is consulting with the people who read it.

Every family I work with is different. So are their businesses, their situations, their problems. In spite of these differences, I’m rarely surprised by anything totally new. But one reader sent me something I had never seen before.

Here’s the story.

After about an hour on the phone discussing an estate plan, son Sam calling at the request of dad Joe agreed to send me some typical information: tax returns, financial statements and a copy of the existing plan. About one week later, a heavy box arrived with a five-inch stack of documents. About four inches worth were nine separate family limited partnerships. They were the same except each partnership owned a different asset: the family business, a residence, investments, etc.

As I thumbed through the papers, I couldn’t help thinking about the drunk who was told, “A shot of whiskey each day is good for you.” The guy who did Joe’s estate plan was clearly drunk on partnerships.

One thing should be made clear: I am an enthusiastic cheerleader for the use of limited partnerships in estate planning. Use ‘em all the time. But this overkill of a single strategy just didn’t do the best possible job.

Using the computations of the adviser, the IRS would get more than $2 million in estate taxes. Another $1.1 million of IRS enrichment was likely because of a gross misuse of the partnership strategy.

What does a family limited partnership accomplish? It allows you as a general partner to totally control the use of any asset transferred to the partnership yet reduce the value of the assets transferred. For example, $1 million of assets transferred to a partnership are usually worth only about $650,000 for tax purposes. That $350,000 discount in a 55 percentestate-tax bracket would reduce your estate-tax burden by $192,500. Not bad!

A familylimited partnership is also a great asset-protection strategy. Creditors can’t get at the assets in the partnership. Neither can divorcing spouses of your kids, who are usually the limited partners.

Used properly, a partnership is almost a perfect tax tool. In general, don’t use them to own the stock of your family business. Nor should one be used for non-income-producing personal assets, like a home or car. It’s a valuable strategy for almost every other asset you might own: publicly traded stocks and bonds, real estate, you name it.

Without covering every detail, we terminated the partnerships that held the family business and two family homes. The business elected S corporation status and was transferred to an intentionally defective trust, and the residences were transferred to qualified personal residence trusts. Those are similar concepts that allow you to heavily discount the value of the assets transferred to them.

We used the liquid assets in two other partnerships to pay the premiums on second-to-die life insurance on Joe and his wife, which was owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust that we created. That trust removes life insurance from the taxable estate of the husband and wife.

When all the smoke clears, Joe and his four children, including Sam, will be enriched $4 million to $7 million more than the original overkill plan, depending on how long Joe and his wife live.

One warning: This is an example of overindulgence in one tax strategy. Although the above descriptions cover the main points of how Joe’s problems were solved., this is not a do-it-yourself kit. There are a number of traps and exceptions. Only proceed with the help of an expert.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General Tax Strategies, General Tax Talk, Uncategorized | No Comments »

« Older Entries

Estate Tax Blog

by Irv Blackman

First and foremost, Irv Blackman is both a CPA and a lawyer. Irv is a tax guy. Stay tuned to the site by signing up for the RSS feed.