Posts Tagged ‘insurance consultant’

Old-Time Tax Religion Yields To New-Time Tax Religion

Monday, April 13th, 2009

If you are a tax sinner, please step forward. Today’s sermon at The First Anti-Tax Church is entitled, “How You Can Enrich the IRS When Transferring Your Business.” Strange title? Not really. It’s the conventional wisdom or what our preacher calls “The Old-Time Tax Religion.”

Following is a true story of good against evil taken straight from the pages of the ever-growing-tax-business bible. If you’re a business owner with two or more children-listen up.

A business owner (age 68) (we’ll call him Joe) from Alabama told me how three employees (ages 38, 45, and 52) had helped build his business (Success Co.) over the years. Profits were plowed back into the business. Today its worth $10 million, with 80 percent owned by Joe and 20 percent owned by the employees. Joe and his wife, Mary, have three children, none active (and not likely to be) in the business.

Joe’s goals are simple: After he passes on, the business should go to the three employees; his three children should get the value ($8 million) of Joe’s share of the business. What’s the conventional wisdom? Have Success Co. own life insurance. The actual amount of insurance is now $11 million. The extra $3 million allows for growth.

The insurance funds a buy-sell agreement. After Joe dies, Success Co. will buy Joe’s stock. Then the employees will own 100 percent of the business. (Good! That’s what Joe wants.) The kids will get the $8 million or more, which is also what Joe wants. Perfect? Joe’s lawyer, accountant, and insurance consultant assured him that this is — by conventional wisdom — the “best” way to go.

What’s wrong with the picture? Each dollar of those insurance proceeds used to buy Joe’s stock will be divided two ways: 55 cents to the IRS; 45 cents to the kids. Unwittingly, the IRS, not Joe’s family will benefit the most from Joe’s business, which took him a lifetime to build.

What to do? The solution may vary with your particular situation (for example, how many kids you have in the business, how many are nonbusiness children, your age, your wife’s age, the value of your business and the value of the rest of your assets). But here’s a plan to beat the pants off of the conventional wisdom and the IRS, legally. And it’s easy to do.

Step one: Get the insurance out of the corporation into Joe’s name and then into an irrevocable life insurance trust. No, the insurance proceeds will be free of the estate tax.

Step two: Recapitalize Success Co. (which will create voting and non-voting stock) so Joe can keep voting control (a tax-free transaction) for as long as he lives. Say there is 100 shares of voting stock and 10,000 shares of non-voting stock. Joe will keep the 100 shares of voting stock (and absolute control) for as long as he lives.

Step three: Create an annual stock-bonus/stock-gift program. Success Co. will give stock bonuses of non-voting stock to the employees. (In a more typical example, the employees would be Joe’s children.) Joe would make annual gifts of Success Co. stock to his children and grandchildren.

This sermon does not attempt to cover all the details of the plan outlined above. Find a professional who knows how to use this structure to craft that transfers most (in many cases all) your wealth free of the estate tax. More importantly, your estate tax liability (whatever the amount) will be transferred, in effect to the insurance carrier.

When all the smoke clears, either your estate tax will be zero or paid 100 percent by tax-free insurance proceeds. It’s time for you and your professionals to get that new-time tax religion.

Want a head start on how to win the transfer/succession/estate tax game? Visit my Web site or call to discuss your specific concerns.

Complete estate plan requires more than will and revocable trust…

Friday, March 27th, 2009

This report on the 2005 wealth transfer plan test improves on the results of my 2004 report, which said in part:

“If you use the right tax tools and techniques together with the right professionals (lawyer, insurance consultant and CPA), you can and will develop a plan to beat the IRS. Every time.

And legally.

“Unfortunately, the goal of the typical estate planner is to reduce estate taxes. Our goal is always the same: to eliminate taxes.

“There are three types of readers who call us for help: readers who (1) have an estate plan but need a second opinion; (2) have no plan; or (3) have been working on a plan for years and just can’t seem to get it done. Which type are you?

“We will do a business succession/estate plan (and any necessary valuation) for each reader. We will report back to you (through this column) how many readers responded, how many we could and could not help, and a summary of the tax tools and techniques used to help the readers.”

Here are the 2004 results. In all, 16 readers (more than we expected) responded; 15 were in either the first or second category and, of course, were easy to help using the tax techniques and strategies described in this column over the years.

A 61-year-old from Ohio — let’s call him Joe — fell into the second-opinion category.

Joe’s letter said in part: “I … enclosed all the information … you asked for. My current plan (it was two short wills and two long revocable trusts — one of each for Joe and for his wife, Mary) looks good … but somehow I don’t feel comfortable.”

Joe and Mary turned out to be a very interesting case, yet sadly, their plan contained some common estate-planning errors. Sure, their documents — wills and trusts — were nearly perfect. Problem is, they just didn’t work. Let’s see why.

Joe and Mary are worth slightly more than $7 million, plus Joe has a number of life insurance policies totaling $2.2 million on his life that name Mary as the beneficiary. The $7 million includes $1.8 million in Joe’s rollover IRA with Mary as beneficiary. The balance of the assets ($5.2 million) — Joe’s business, their residence, some real estate and other investments — are all held in joint tenancy by Joe and Mary.

The wills and trusts — 46 pages in total — were designed by a large law firm to pass Joe and Mary’s assets in a highly organized plan, first to the surviving spouse and then to their children and grandchildren. Because Joe is four years older than Mary, and women outlive men by about four years, it was assumed that Joe would pass on first.

OK, suppose Joe goes to heaven first. Everything, and we mean everything, would go directly to Mary. Joe’s trust would get nothing and be a worthless stack of paper.

This is why: As the named beneficiary, Mary would get the $2.2 million of insurance. For the same reason — being the named beneficiary — Mary gets the $1.8 million in the IRA.

What about the other assets, worth $5.2 million? All to Mary immediately — because property held in joint tenancy goes to the survivor.

It should be pointed out that if Mary dies the day after Joe, the tax bite would exceed $3.5 million (using 2011 estate tax rates) of the $9.2 million now owned by Mary. Their kids would net only about $5.7 million.

What’s the lesson to be learned from this second-opinion story? Standing alone, a will and a revocable trust — no matter how terrific — can never be a complete estate plan.

We used a number of strategies to change Joe and Mary’s estate plan:

• A qualified personal residence trust for the residences.

• An intentionally defective trust to transfer Joe’s business to the kids tax-free.

• An irrevocable life insurance trust for the insurance.

• A subtrust for the profit- sharing plan to pay for the additional life insurance needed.

• A family limited partnership to hold the balance (real estate and investments) of their assets.

• An organized future- gift-giving program to their children and grandchildren.

With minor changes, the original wills and trusts were left alone.

After the above strategies and completed plans are put in place, if Joe and Mary get hit by the same bus, the kids would net, after taxes, about $9.5 million. The longer Joe and Mary live, as the future- gifting program is implemented, the more tax-free dollars are transferred to the kids.

If you want to participate in the 2006 wealth transfer plan test, please send the following information to: Irv Blackman, Wealth Transfer Plan Test, Blackman Kallick Bartelstein LLP, 3960 Deer Crossing Court, unit 102, Naples, FL 34114.

For your business: Your last year-end financial statement (all pages).

Personal: A current personal financial statement for you and your spouse.

A family tree: Your name and birthday. Same for your spouse, children, their spouses and your grandchildren.

All phone numbers: Business, home and cell.

What’s our job? To create the right plan for you, your family and your business — and to coordinate and work with your professionals. If you have a question, call me at 417-9732.

OK, that’s our plan to help you do your plan — and do it right. Let’s hear from you.