Posts Tagged ‘family limited partnership’

Want To Get Real estate Out Of Your Corporation — Tax Free?

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Do you have real estate in your corporation? If so, raise your hand and keep reading. About once a month, we get a call at the office asking a question something like this: “How can I get real estate out of my corporation without being taxed to death?”

Actually, we could write a small book about the various facts and circumstances that impact on how-to-remove-real estate from your corporation. The book would answer many questions. Stuff like: Are you a C corporation or an S corporation? Are there retained earnings? And how much? How much has the real estate appreciated? And on and on.

Each additional fact might change the tax strategy needed to answer the question — to cover all the possibilities is beyond the scope of this column. Instead, let’s set up the facts and circumstances that represent over 95 percent of the calls and the recommended solution to get-the-real-estate-out-of-the-corporation problem.

Typical facts and circumstances

Joe owns Success Co., a C corporation with a large amount of retained earnings and one or more pieces of real estate that has significantly appreciated in value. Most of the time the real estate has a building on it, but it could be vacant. (If Success Co. is an S corporation, it has a large amount of old C corporation earnings frozen in place, and the same real estate facts).

The solution

As you read what follows, keep in mind that you don’t have to know how to build a car in order to drive one. Put it another way: Don’t sweat the technical details; simply concentrate on the unbelievable favorable tax results.

Here’s the process:

• Joe forms a family limited partnership (FLIP) outside of Success Co. Then, Success Co. contributes vacant land (if the land is improved, Success keeps the improvements as leasehold improvements) to the FLIP. The land is worth $1 million (of course, it could be any amount). In exchange, Success Co. receives (ownership of 99 percent of the FLIP) limited partnership interests. Joe contributes $10,000 in cash to the FLIP for a one percent general partnership interest. As the general partner Joe has all the voting rights and makes all the decisions.

• Success Co. leases the real estate from the FLIP for $100,000 per year.

• An independent appraiser values the FLIP interest (after applying a 40 percent discount for general lack of marketability) at $600,000. Yes, the $1 million land is only worth $600,000, because it’s in the FLIP-for tax purposes.

• Success Co. contributes 99 percent of its limited FLIP interests to a charitable lead trust (CLT) with the following terms: The FLIP will pay $99,000 per year to the CLT for eight years. (NOTE: Typically the CLT then makes contributions to Joe’s Family Foundation). Let’s pause to follow the money. Success pays $100,000 rent to the FLIP; the FLIP pays $99,000 to the CLT, which makes contributions to Joe’s foundation.

• First some information: According to IRS tables, the value of the annuity (the $99,000 to be received for eight years by the CLT) is $569,000. So, the value of the one percent remainder interest (the part of the FLIP still owned by Success Co. immediately after the gift of the FLIP to the CRT) is only $31,000 (the $600,000 discounted value of the land, minus the $569,000 value of the eight-year annuity gifted to the CLT, leaves $31,000 as the value of the remainder interest). Simply put, Success Co. owns an asset that according to the IRS is worth only $31,000. Joe’s children buy the one percent remainder interest from Success Co. for $31,000.

• After eight years the CLT ends. Joe’s children, who are the beneficiaries of the CLT receive and now own 99 percent of the limited FLIP interests. Remember, they bought (and own) the other one percent from Success Co. eight years ago. The CLT and Success Co. are out of the picture. Better yet, the real estate is out of the corporation, owned 100 percent by Joe’s children. And there is a bonus: The real estate is also out of Joe’s estate. The entire transaction is tax-free to the FLIP, the CLT, Joe, the kids and Success Co. (might owe tax on the $31,000 sale).

Now one warning: The above is an easy way to get your real estate-tax-free-out of your corporation. But you must use experienced advisors who know how to dot the ‘i’s and cross the ‘t’s.

Do you have real estate in your corporation? If so, raise your hand and keep reading. About once a month, we get a call at the office asking a question something like this: “How can I get real estate out of my corporation without being taxed to death?”

Actually, we could write a small book about the various facts and circumstances that impact on how-to-remove-real estate from your corporation. The book would answer many questions. Stuff like: Are you a C corporation or an S corporation? Are there retained earnings? And how much? How much has the real estate appreciated? And on and on.

Each additional fact might change the tax strategy needed to answer the question — to cover all the possibilities is beyond the scope of this column. Instead, let’s set up the facts and circumstances that represent over 95 percent of the calls and the recommended solution to get-the-real-estate-out-of-the-corporation problem.

Typical facts and circumstances

Joe owns Success Co., a C corporation with a large amount of retained earnings and one or more pieces of real estate that has significantly appreciated in value. Most of the time the real estate has a building on it, but it could be vacant. (If Success Co. is an S corporation, it has a large amount of old C corporation earnings frozen in place, and the same real estate facts).

The solution

As you read what follows, keep in mind that you don’t have to know how to build a car in order to drive one. Put it another way: Don’t sweat the technical details; simply concentrate on the unbelievable favorable tax results.

Here’s the process:

• Joe forms a family limited partnership (FLIP) outside of Success Co. Then, Success Co. contributes vacant land (if the land is improved, Success keeps the improvements as leasehold improvements) to the FLIP. The land is worth $1 million (of course, it could be any amount). In exchange, Success Co. receives (ownership of 99 percent of the FLIP) limited partnership interests. Joe contributes $10,000 in cash to the FLIP for a one percent general partnership interest. As the general partner Joe has all the voting rights and makes all the decisions.

• Success Co. leases the real estate from the FLIP for $100,000 per year.

• An independent appraiser values the FLIP interest (after applying a 40 percent discount for general lack of marketability) at $600,000. Yes, the $1 million land is only worth $600,000, because it’s in the FLIP-for tax purposes.

• Success Co. contributes 99 percent of its limited FLIP interests to a charitable lead trust (CLT) with the following terms: The FLIP will pay $99,000 per year to the CLT for eight years. (NOTE: Typically the CLT then makes contributions to Joe’s Family Foundation). Let’s pause to follow the money. Success pays $100,000 rent to the FLIP; the FLIP pays $99,000 to the CLT, which makes contributions to Joe’s foundation.

• First some information: According to IRS tables, the value of the annuity (the $99,000 to be received for eight years by the CLT) is $569,000. So, the value of the one percent remainder interest (the part of the FLIP still owned by Success Co. immediately after the gift of the FLIP to the CRT) is only $31,000 (the $600,000 discounted value of the land, minus the $569,000 value of the eight-year annuity gifted to the CLT, leaves $31,000 as the value of the remainder interest). Simply put, Success Co. owns an asset that according to the IRS is worth only $31,000. Joe’s children buy the one percent remainder interest from Success Co. for $31,000.

• After eight years the CLT ends. Joe’s children, who are the beneficiaries of the CLT receive and now own 99 percent of the limited FLIP interests. Remember, they bought (and own) the other one percent from Success Co. eight years ago. The CLT and Success Co. are out of the picture. Better yet, the real estate is out of the corporation, owned 100 percent by Joe’s children. And there is a bonus: The real estate is also out of Joe’s estate. The entire transaction is tax-free to the FLIP, the CLT, Joe, the kids and Success Co. (might owe tax on the $31,000 sale).

Now one warning: The above is an easy way to get your real estate-tax-free-out of your corporation. But you must use experienced advisors who know how to dot the ‘i’s and cross the ‘t’s.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, Planning | No Comments »

Don’t Get Stuck In These IRS Tax Traps

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

If you own a business and your estate plan uses or intends to use any of the four commonly used techniques (actually tax traps) discussed in this article, you will unnecessarily enrich the IRS.

Guaranteed!

Let’s set-up the typical family-business situation we see at least 100 times every year. Joe, who is married to Mary, owns Success Co. Sam, their son, runs the business and someday will replace Joe. They have other children who are not active in the business.

The traps are listed here in order of the most serious and most frequent blunder.

The marital deduction. After Joe’s death, Mary will own Success Co. or a large portion of it in her own name or in some kind of marital trust. That’s great, when Joe dies. No estate tax. But when Mary goes, the IRS gets its pound of flesh. Remember, the marital deduction only defers tax; it’s not intended to be a tax saver.

A Section 303 redemption. Success Co. can redeem as much of Joe’s stock as necessary, free of any income or capital- gains tax to pay Joe’s (or Mary’s) death taxes and other estate costs. Sounds good. But the fact is, the money that comes out of Success Co. goes straight to the IRS.

Section 6166. Because Success Co. is a major asset in Joe’s (or Mary’s) estate, the estate tax can be paid in installments for up to 15 years with interest at a very low rate. Not only does the IRS get the estate tax, it now gets (even though a low percentage) interest to boot.

Normally this column tells you what to do to win the tax game, as opposed to telling you what not to do. OK, then. Here’s what you must do to check your estate plan and know it’s right for you and your family:

• The strategies you use must be initiated during your life (such as gifts, a grantor retained annuity trust or a family limited partnership), not at death (the three traps described in this article).

• When the entire plan is in place, your advisor should show you clearly that your total wealth will go to your family without being reduced in value by even one dime of estate taxes.

• Your advisor must get you into some kind of tax-free environment, such as an irrevocable life-insurance trust or some kind of charitable trust, immediately.

• You control your assets for as long as you live (or at least as long as you want) with the use of voting/nonvoting stock, a family limited partnership or various trusts.

• Finally, your assets are protected from creditors and lawsuits.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies, Insurance | No Comments »

Don’t go overboard with one kind of tax strategy

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Professionally, my second love is writing this column. My first love is consulting with the people who read it.

Every family I work with is different. So are their businesses, their situations, their problems. In spite of these differences, I’m rarely surprised by anything totally new. But one reader sent me something I had never seen before.

Here’s the story.

After about an hour on the phone discussing an estate plan, son Sam calling at the request of dad Joe agreed to send me some typical information: tax returns, financial statements and a copy of the existing plan. About one week later, a heavy box arrived with a five-inch stack of documents. About four inches worth were nine separate family limited partnerships. They were the same except each partnership owned a different asset: the family business, a residence, investments, etc.

As I thumbed through the papers, I couldn’t help thinking about the drunk who was told, “A shot of whiskey each day is good for you.” The guy who did Joe’s estate plan was clearly drunk on partnerships.

One thing should be made clear: I am an enthusiastic cheerleader for the use of limited partnerships in estate planning. Use ‘em all the time. But this overkill of a single strategy just didn’t do the best possible job.

Using the computations of the adviser, the IRS would get more than $2 million in estate taxes. Another $1.1 million of IRS enrichment was likely because of a gross misuse of the partnership strategy.

What does a family limited partnership accomplish? It allows you as a general partner to totally control the use of any asset transferred to the partnership yet reduce the value of the assets transferred. For example, $1 million of assets transferred to a partnership are usually worth only about $650,000 for tax purposes. That $350,000 discount in a 55 percentestate-tax bracket would reduce your estate-tax burden by $192,500. Not bad!

A familylimited partnership is also a great asset-protection strategy. Creditors can’t get at the assets in the partnership. Neither can divorcing spouses of your kids, who are usually the limited partners.

Used properly, a partnership is almost a perfect tax tool. In general, don’t use them to own the stock of your family business. Nor should one be used for non-income-producing personal assets, like a home or car. It’s a valuable strategy for almost every other asset you might own: publicly traded stocks and bonds, real estate, you name it.

Without covering every detail, we terminated the partnerships that held the family business and two family homes. The business elected S corporation status and was transferred to an intentionally defective trust, and the residences were transferred to qualified personal residence trusts. Those are similar concepts that allow you to heavily discount the value of the assets transferred to them.

We used the liquid assets in two other partnerships to pay the premiums on second-to-die life insurance on Joe and his wife, which was owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust that we created. That trust removes life insurance from the taxable estate of the husband and wife.

When all the smoke clears, Joe and his four children, including Sam, will be enriched $4 million to $7 million more than the original overkill plan, depending on how long Joe and his wife live.

One warning: This is an example of overindulgence in one tax strategy. Although the above descriptions cover the main points of how Joe’s problems were solved., this is not a do-it-yourself kit. There are a number of traps and exceptions. Only proceed with the help of an expert.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General Tax Strategies, General Tax Talk, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Save by getting the real estate out of the corporation

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Do you have real estate in your corporation? If so, raise your hand and keep reading. About once a month, we get a call at the office asking a question something like this: “How can I get real estate out of my corporation without being taxed to death?”

Actually, we could write a small book about the various facts and circumstances you should consider. The book would answer many questions:

Are you a C corporation or an S corporation?

Are there retained earnings? How much?

How much has the real estate appreciated?

Each additional fact might change the tax strategy needed. To cover all the possibilities is beyond the scope of this column.

Instead, let’s set up the facts and circumstances that cover more 95 percent of the calls and the recommended solution to get-the-real-estate-out-of-the-corporation problem.

The typical facts and circumstances. Joe owns Success Co., a C corporation with a large amount of retained earnings and one or more pieces of real estate that have significantly appreciated in value. Most of the time the real estate has a building on it, but it could be vacant. (If Success Co. is an S corporation, it has a large amount of old C corporation earnings frozen in place, and the same real-estate facts).

The Solution. Keep in mind that you don’t have to know how to build a car in order to drive one. Don’t sweat the technical details; just concentrate on the unbelievable favorable tax results.

Here’s the easy six-step process:

1. Joe forms a family limited partnership outside of Success Co. Then Success Co. contributes vacant land to the partnership. (If the land is improved, Success Co. keeps the improvements as leasehold improvements.) Say the land is worth $1 million. In exchange, Success Co. receives ownership of 99 percent of the limited partnership. Joe contributes $10,000 in cash for a 1 percent general-partnership interest. As the general partner, Joe has all the voting rights and makes all the decisions.

2. Success Co. leases the land for $100,000 a year.

3. An independent appraiser values the limited partnership interest at $600,000 after applying a 40 percent discount for lack of marketability. Yes, the $1 million property is worth only $600,000, because it’s in the limited partnership merely for tax purposes.

4. Success Co. contributes 99 percent of its limited partnership to a charitable trust with the following terms: The partnership will pay $99,000 a year to the trust for eight years. (Typically the trust then makes contributions to Joe’s Family Foundation. Follow the money: Success pays $100,000 rent to the partnership, the partnership pays $99,000 to the trust and the trust contributes to Joe’s foundation.

5. Joe’s children buy the remaining 1 percent interest from Success Co. According to the IRS, the value of the $99,000 the trust will receive over the eight years is $569,000. So the value of the part of the partnership that Success Co. still owns is $600,000 minus the $569,000, or $31,000. Simply put, Success Co. owns an asset that according to the IRS is worth $31,000. That’s how much Joe’s children pay.

6. After eight years, the trust ends. Joe’s children, who are the beneficiaries of the trust, receive and now own the 99 percent of the limited partnership. Remember, they bought the other 1 percent from Success Co. eight years ago. So Success Co. and the trust are out of the picture.

Better yet, the real estate is out of the corporation, owned 100 percent by Joe’s children.

And there’s a bonus: The real estate is also out of Joe’s estate. The entire transaction is tax-free to the partnership, the trust, Joe, the kids and Success Co, except that Success might owe tax on the $31,000 sale.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, General Tax Strategies, Investment Strategies, Uncategorized | No Comments »

A tale of two clients

Friday, March 27th, 2009

It is rare that I consult with any two clients who are the same. Or even almost the same.

This column is an exception to the rule.

Two couples called me for a second opinion in the same week. They wanted my advice on their four-year-old estate plans.

Let’s start with the basic facts.

Estate A

Joe, 67, and May, 65, have three children, none of whom is in the business. For their five grandchildren they used an education plan.

They used a family limited partnership for their $400,000 in cash assets and their $9.6 million invested in stocks and bonds.

The couple used a 50/50, a method for holding title to their homes yielding a large discount for estate tax purposes, for their two residences worth $1.8 million.

They used a subtrust for their $2.4 million in IRA and 401(k) investments.

They sold their business and their total assets are $14.2 million.

Estate B

Pat, 62, and Sue, 61, have three children, all of whom are in the business. For their seven grandchildren they used an education plan.

They used a family limited partnership for their $300,000 in cash assets and their $1.9 million invested in stocks and bonds.

The couple used a 50/50 for their two residences worth $2.1 million.

They used a subtrust for their $2.2 million in IRA and 401(k) investments.

They used an intentionally defective trust for their business worth $7 million. They used another family limited partnership for their business real estate worth $2.6 million.

Their total assets are $16.1 million.

A few more facts: Joe had a successful business that he wanted to transfer to his son, Sam (the only business child), who ran the business daily.

Sam was killed in an auto accident. Heartbroken, Joe sold the business, including the business real estate. The after-tax proceeds are included in Joe and May’s investments.

An interesting point is that if Joe had not sold his business, the total assets for Joe and May and for Pat and Sue would be almost identical.

Also, the asset mix now — except for the business and business real estate — is identical.

If both couples got hit by the same bus (with their current estate plans in place), the estate tax liability using 2011 rates would be about $6.8 million for Joe and May and $7.7 million for Pat and Sue. That leaves a net of $5.4 million to Joe and May’s family, and $6.4 million to Pat and Sue’s family.

Now look at Estate A’s strategies — the family limited partnership and subtrust — and Estate B’s strategies — the family limited partnership, subtrust and intentionally defective trust. You get a quick bird’s-eye view of two typical estate plans: one without a family business and one with a family business.

This column over the years has hammered away at the concept that you design a proper estate plan by selecting the right strategies to satisfy your goals based on the assets you own. Basically, these two families have identical goals: to maintain their lifestyles for as long as they live, to pass their wealth on to their heirs intact (eliminating the impact of the estate tax) and to educate the grandchildren.

And, of course, Pat and Sue have one more goal: to transfer the business tax-free to their three sons, all of whom are active full time in the business.

One final goal: Both Joe and Pat want to control all their assets — including the business, for Pat — for as long as they live.

Pause for a moment. How many of the above goals are the same for your family?

The strategies used in both of the estates accomplish all the goals listed for both families. The single biggest tax-saver and creator of tax-free wealth is the subtrust, which was used to buy second-to-die life insurance ($5 million for Joe and May and $6 million for Pat and Sue).

When the new estate plans are fully implemented, it is estimated that the families will receive the following dollar values of assets — all taxes, if any, paid in full: Joe and May in excess of $16 million; Pat and Sue in excess of $18 million. These amounts are more than double what would have been received under the old estate plans.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, Planning | No Comments »