Posts Tagged ‘Estate Tax’

« Older Entries

Yes, you can beat the estate tax, legally, and easily

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

If you use the right tax tools and techniques together with the right professionals (lawyer, insurance consultant, and CPA), you can and will develop a plan to beat the IRS. Every time. And legally.
Unfortunately, the goal of the typical estate planner is to reduce estate taxes. Our goal is always the same: eliminate the robber-like estate tax.
There are three types of readers of this column that call me for help: The reader who (1) has an estate plan but needs a second opinion, (2) has no plan, or (3) has been working on a plan for years and just can’t seem to get it done. Which type are you?…. Write your answer here ____________.
You might be interested in knowing that no matter which type you are, you have lots of company. Here are the percentages: (1) need a second opinion – 55%; (2) no plan – 15%; (3) working on a plan, can’t get it done – 30%.
Following is a real-life, second-opinion plan that should help you no matter which category you happen to be in: A 61-year old from Ohio, who winters in Florida, (let’s call him Joe) falls into the first opinion category. Joe’s letter says in part: “I… enclosed all the information… you asked for. My current plan [it was two short wills and two long revocable trusts. One of each for Joe: the others for his wife Mary] looks good… but somehow I don’t feel comfortable… So request… a second opinion.”
Joe and Mary turned out to be a very interesting case, yet, sadly and as is often the case, contains some common estate plan errors. Sure, their documents – wills and trusts – were near perfect. Problem is they just didn’t work. Let’s see why. Joe and Mary are worth just over $8 million, plus Joe has a number of life insurance policies totaling $2.7 million on his life that name Mary as the beneficiary. The $8 million includes $1.9 million in Joe’s rollover IRA with Mary as beneficiary. The balance of the assets ($6.1 million) – Joe’s business, their Ohio and Florida residences, some rental real estate and other investments – are all held in joint tenancy by Joe and Mary.
The wills and trusts – 46 pages in total – were designed by a large law firm to pass Joe’s and Mary’s assets in a highly organized plan, first to the survivor of Joe and Mary and then to their children and grandchildren. Because Joe is 4 years older than Mary (and females outlive males by about 4 years), it was assumed that Joe would pass on first.
Okay, suppose Joe goes to heaven first in 2009. Everything, and we mean everything (because of the joint tenancy) would go directly to Mary. Joe’s trust would get nothing and be a worthless stack of papers. Mary would get her $2.7 million in insurance. For the same reason – named beneficiary – Mary gets the $1.9 million in the IRA. What about the other assets – worth $6.1 million? All to Mary immediately. Let me repeat: because property held in joint tenancy goes to the survivor.
It should be pointed out that if Mary had died the day after Joe, the tax bite would have exceeded $3.1 million (using current 2009 estate tax rates, top rate of 45%) on the $10.7 million now owned by Mary. Their kids would net only about $7.6 million.
What’s the lesson to be learned from this second opinion story: a will and a revocable trust – no matter how terrific – standing alone can never be a complete estate plan.
We used a number of strategies to change Joe’s and Mary’s estate plan: (1) a qualified personal residence trust for the residences, (2) an intentionally defective trust to transfer Joe’s business to the kids…Tax-free, (3) an irrevocable trust for the insurance, (4) retirement plan rescue for the IRA to pay for the additional life insurance needed, (5) a family limited partnership
to hold the balance (real estate and investments) of their assets, and (6) an organized future-gift-giving program to their children and grandchildren. With minor changes, the original wills and trust were left alone.
Important Note: I predict that Congress will (before December 31, 2009), amend the estate tax law to make the first $3.5 million of your taxable estate tax-free. So for a married couple, $7 million can escape the estate tax monster.
After the above strategies and completed plans are put in place, if Joe and Mary get hit by the same bus, the kids would net, after taxes, about $11.2 million (includes the additional life insurance in strategy (4) above). The longer Joe and Mary live, as the future-gifting program – over time – is implemented, the more tax-free dollars will be transferred to the kids.
If you would like a second opinion on your current estate plan, please send the following information:
1. For Your Business. Your last year-end financial statement (all pages).
2. Personal. A current personal financial statement for you and your spouse.
3. A family tree. Your name and birthday. Same for your spouse, children, children’s spouses and your grandchildren.
4. Documents. Hold them for now. We will request them at a later date.
5. All phone numbers where you can be reached: business, home, cell.
Send to Irv Blackman, SECOND OPINION, 4545 W. Touhy Avenue, Lincolnwood, IL 60712. What’s our job?… To create the right plan for you, your family, and your business… and to coordinate and work with your professionals. If you have a question call Irv at 847-674-5295.
Okay, that’s the plan. Let’s hear from you.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, Featured | No Comments »

Please write a check to the IRS for $3,167,000

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Through the years, our office has listened to an endless stream of taxpayers complain about the income tax.

But if you ever want to see anger, frustration and bitterness, meet with the beneficiaries (usually the kids) of an estate when they are told to write a seven- or eight-figure check to the IRS — for estate taxes.

Taxes that could have been avoided with proper planning.

Tragic!

A recent post-death estate planning consultation got us thinking about what you are now reading. Yes, the estate tax was exactly $3,167,000 after Mom died; Dad had died six years earlier. The really sad part of this story is that Dad’s and Mom’s entire estate tax liability could have been legally avoided with a rather simple estate plan.

Mom and Dad were survived by three kids and eight grandchildren. The business that Dad started back in the mid-50s was worth $4.5 million and owned 100 percent by Mom when she died.

According to Dad’s estate tax return, the business, which he left to Mom, was worth $2.9 million when he died. No estate tax (because of the marital deduction) was paid when Dad died.

Dad and Mom had a typical estate plan: a will and a trust. The trust created two trusts: one trust to take advantage of passing $1 million tax-free (the amount that was tax-free when Dad died) and a second trust to capture the marital deduction.

The tax-free amount is $2 million in 2006, rising to $3.5 million in 2009 and back to $1 million in 2011.

There is no estate tax if you die in 2010. I’m betting Congress will change these amounts before 2010 (or sooner).

The real answer (to why many people procrastinate and don’t complete a comprehensive estate plan during their life) is the deceased person whose estate caused the tax did not have to personally write that big check to the IRS.

Whenever we are about to plan an estate, we estimate the amount of estate tax that ultimately will be due.

Then we ask the client to write a check to the IRS for that amount. The client always gets the point. Then, we plan the estate so the client’s wealth goes to their family, instead of the IRS.

The plan must be a lifetime plan, that implements the proper strategies, as necessary, during your life. A plan contained in the typical will and trust-like Mom’s and Dad’s above-only enriches the IRS.

The person (your executor) who must write the check to pay your estate tax is helpless when it comes to minimizing or eliminating the estate tax. Only you, while you are alive, can eliminate the estate tax… by creating the proper comprehensive estate plan.

Here are the three things you can do to drive the estate-tax devil away:

(1) Learn all you can (this column is a good start);

(2) No matter what your age, put a complete estate plan into place now (then monitor it every two to four years);

(3) Only work with experienced professionals who can show you how to pass all your wealth — intact —to your family (if you are not sure, get a second opinion).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Don’t go overboard with one kind of tax strategy

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Professionally, my second love is writing this column. My first love is consulting with the people who read it.

Every family I work with is different. So are their businesses, their situations, their problems. In spite of these differences, I’m rarely surprised by anything totally new. But one reader sent me something I had never seen before.

Here’s the story.

After about an hour on the phone discussing an estate plan, son Sam calling at the request of dad Joe agreed to send me some typical information: tax returns, financial statements and a copy of the existing plan. About one week later, a heavy box arrived with a five-inch stack of documents. About four inches worth were nine separate family limited partnerships. They were the same except each partnership owned a different asset: the family business, a residence, investments, etc.

As I thumbed through the papers, I couldn’t help thinking about the drunk who was told, “A shot of whiskey each day is good for you.” The guy who did Joe’s estate plan was clearly drunk on partnerships.

One thing should be made clear: I am an enthusiastic cheerleader for the use of limited partnerships in estate planning. Use ‘em all the time. But this overkill of a single strategy just didn’t do the best possible job.

Using the computations of the adviser, the IRS would get more than $2 million in estate taxes. Another $1.1 million of IRS enrichment was likely because of a gross misuse of the partnership strategy.

What does a family limited partnership accomplish? It allows you as a general partner to totally control the use of any asset transferred to the partnership yet reduce the value of the assets transferred. For example, $1 million of assets transferred to a partnership are usually worth only about $650,000 for tax purposes. That $350,000 discount in a 55 percentestate-tax bracket would reduce your estate-tax burden by $192,500. Not bad!

A familylimited partnership is also a great asset-protection strategy. Creditors can’t get at the assets in the partnership. Neither can divorcing spouses of your kids, who are usually the limited partners.

Used properly, a partnership is almost a perfect tax tool. In general, don’t use them to own the stock of your family business. Nor should one be used for non-income-producing personal assets, like a home or car. It’s a valuable strategy for almost every other asset you might own: publicly traded stocks and bonds, real estate, you name it.

Without covering every detail, we terminated the partnerships that held the family business and two family homes. The business elected S corporation status and was transferred to an intentionally defective trust, and the residences were transferred to qualified personal residence trusts. Those are similar concepts that allow you to heavily discount the value of the assets transferred to them.

We used the liquid assets in two other partnerships to pay the premiums on second-to-die life insurance on Joe and his wife, which was owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust that we created. That trust removes life insurance from the taxable estate of the husband and wife.

When all the smoke clears, Joe and his four children, including Sam, will be enriched $4 million to $7 million more than the original overkill plan, depending on how long Joe and his wife live.

One warning: This is an example of overindulgence in one tax strategy. Although the above descriptions cover the main points of how Joe’s problems were solved., this is not a do-it-yourself kit. There are a number of traps and exceptions. Only proceed with the help of an expert.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General Tax Strategies, General Tax Talk, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Save by getting the real estate out of the corporation

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Do you have real estate in your corporation? If so, raise your hand and keep reading. About once a month, we get a call at the office asking a question something like this: “How can I get real estate out of my corporation without being taxed to death?”

Actually, we could write a small book about the various facts and circumstances you should consider. The book would answer many questions:

Are you a C corporation or an S corporation?

Are there retained earnings? How much?

How much has the real estate appreciated?

Each additional fact might change the tax strategy needed. To cover all the possibilities is beyond the scope of this column.

Instead, let’s set up the facts and circumstances that cover more 95 percent of the calls and the recommended solution to get-the-real-estate-out-of-the-corporation problem.

The typical facts and circumstances. Joe owns Success Co., a C corporation with a large amount of retained earnings and one or more pieces of real estate that have significantly appreciated in value. Most of the time the real estate has a building on it, but it could be vacant. (If Success Co. is an S corporation, it has a large amount of old C corporation earnings frozen in place, and the same real-estate facts).

The Solution. Keep in mind that you don’t have to know how to build a car in order to drive one. Don’t sweat the technical details; just concentrate on the unbelievable favorable tax results.

Here’s the easy six-step process:

1. Joe forms a family limited partnership outside of Success Co. Then Success Co. contributes vacant land to the partnership. (If the land is improved, Success Co. keeps the improvements as leasehold improvements.) Say the land is worth $1 million. In exchange, Success Co. receives ownership of 99 percent of the limited partnership. Joe contributes $10,000 in cash for a 1 percent general-partnership interest. As the general partner, Joe has all the voting rights and makes all the decisions.

2. Success Co. leases the land for $100,000 a year.

3. An independent appraiser values the limited partnership interest at $600,000 after applying a 40 percent discount for lack of marketability. Yes, the $1 million property is worth only $600,000, because it’s in the limited partnership merely for tax purposes.

4. Success Co. contributes 99 percent of its limited partnership to a charitable trust with the following terms: The partnership will pay $99,000 a year to the trust for eight years. (Typically the trust then makes contributions to Joe’s Family Foundation. Follow the money: Success pays $100,000 rent to the partnership, the partnership pays $99,000 to the trust and the trust contributes to Joe’s foundation.

5. Joe’s children buy the remaining 1 percent interest from Success Co. According to the IRS, the value of the $99,000 the trust will receive over the eight years is $569,000. So the value of the part of the partnership that Success Co. still owns is $600,000 minus the $569,000, or $31,000. Simply put, Success Co. owns an asset that according to the IRS is worth $31,000. That’s how much Joe’s children pay.

6. After eight years, the trust ends. Joe’s children, who are the beneficiaries of the trust, receive and now own the 99 percent of the limited partnership. Remember, they bought the other 1 percent from Success Co. eight years ago. So Success Co. and the trust are out of the picture.

Better yet, the real estate is out of the corporation, owned 100 percent by Joe’s children.

And there’s a bonus: The real estate is also out of Joe’s estate. The entire transaction is tax-free to the partnership, the trust, Joe, the kids and Success Co, except that Success might owe tax on the $31,000 sale.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, General Tax Strategies, Investment Strategies, Uncategorized | No Comments »

How to invest your accumulated cash profits

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Business owners have many legitimate complaints these days: taxes, regulations, competition (from home and abroad), can’t find good people.

The list goes on and on. Always has, always will.

Yet the pride of the American capitalistic system is the successful family business. These entrepreneurs have found their way through, around or over the seemingly endless obstacles to become a “successful business owner.”

An SBO for short.

For the purposes of this article, SBOs have excess funds to invest (other than back into the operation of their business that produced the funds in the first place). Typically these excess funds are in one (or more) of three places: (1) still in the business, (2) in their (or spouse’s) name or (3) in a qualified plan (profit-sharing, 401(k), IRA or similar plan).

Over the years, the quote that follows has been nicknamed the SBO’s lament:

“I know how to make money in my business, but when it comes to making money with my investment money, either I don’t have time to watch it, don’t know how to watch it or rely on my investment advisor. When the market is up, my advisors do fine, when it’s down they do lousy.”

For the past couple of years, the lament usually ends with, “Now the market is lousy (or down, or uncertain, or similar words). What should I do?”

Now, regular readers of this column know that I am a tax planner prone to finding legal ways to avoid all types of taxes — particularly estate taxes. To do this requires, among other things, getting my client’s personal balance sheet.

Here’s what I can tell you that the balance sheets reveal about the investments of SBOs (and also other estate planning clients). Their success (or failure) in the stock market and a myriad of other investments, in general, mirrors the Dow Jones: happy on the way up and painful on the way down.

Usually, real estate investments are a winner.

Now what about that excess cash? Terrible results. Almost always the investments are conservative: divided between (1) CDs and money market funds, (2) municipal bonds and (3) a “zillion” variety of annuities. After taxes and inflation, your net earnings on (1) investments are typically less than 3 percent, sometimes even negative. Those income tax free bonds, (2), not only have a low rate of return, but fall in value when interest rates rise. Annuities, (3), could fill a large book to describe all the varieties and, most of all, the complaints from clients.

Never has a client told me that he/she is happy with the results of an annuity. (Sure would like to hear from a reader who has personally had a positive experience with any annuity.)

As you can imagine, almost every estate planning consultation with an SBO — and other clients — requires serious consideration concerning the client’s investments: safety, risk, tax consequences, rate of return and other factors. We discuss alternate investments, considering, among other things: profitability, risk and how taxed.

Currently, the most popular alternative investment is senior settlements (SS), also called Life Settlements. The following quote from The Wall Street Journal and USA Today (and other sources) tells you why SS are becoming such a popular investment.

“Life Settlements (have become a) trillion dollar industry, dominated by institutional investors including Berkshire Hathaway (billionaire Warren Buffet’s company), AIG and CNA. Their pursuit of this market is related to the degree of safety, high yields in excess of 15 percent per year and the fact that a Life Settlement is not affected by market forces.

“Life settlements are a very good option for the investor who has as his or her investment philosophy a desire for a secure, safe and ‘no risk’ investment. It is for your ‘nest egg’ money. It is not considered a security by SEC. Therefore it is not normally provided as an investment option by stock brokers.”

Of course, your question is: “Can a little guy (as opposed to an institutional investor) invest in SS?

Yes, it’s all made possible by a small, publicly traded (on the NASDAQ) company. Its average rate of return an SS investments has been 16.28 percent per year on average during the company’s 14-year operating history.

If you want to make a killing on your investments, SS are not for you. But if a 16 percent-plus rate of return, with no market risk is of interest to you (or your IRA, 401(k) or other qualified plan) fax me (847-674-5299) your name, address, phone numbers (business/home/cell) and estimated amount to invest ($50,000 minimum, for accredited investors).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, General Tax Strategies, Investment Strategies, Uncategorized | No Comments »

« Older Entries

Estate Tax Blog

by Irv Blackman

First and foremost, Irv Blackman is both a CPA and a lawyer. Irv is a tax guy. Stay tuned to the site by signing up for the RSS feed.