Posts Tagged ‘assets’

Did your lawyer (inadvertently) rip you off

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Joe (a 63-year old reader of this column who hails from Iowa, but winters in Florida) almost cried when talking to me on the phone. He said, “I still want to kick myself for thinking my estate plan was done. For years I was convinced that my plan was perfect.

“I never stopped reading and studying. You know, articles. Even books. All my professionals assured me my plan was the best it could be. I religiously attended seminars. I consulted regularly with my CPA and several lawyers. All confirmed that the estate plan drawn by my lawyer Mike was right for me and Mary (Joe’s wife).

“It never occurred to me that so many estate planning experts could be so dead wrong or that there’s a better way to transfer my business to the kids and deal with my other assets. Not until a friend brought me a small pile of your articles.

“I immediately read and reread the articles. The next day, I went to Mike’s office. Basically he gave three reasons why the dozens of concepts and ideas in your articles wouldn’t work for me: don’t apply to me, never heard of it or he’ll check it out and call me.”

The above summarizes about 20 minutes of Joe telling me about his years of planning with Mike (a friend and well-respected lawyer who specializes in estate planning).

Then, I asked Joe a series of blunt questions. His answers revealed Joe’s professionals had crafted a traditional estate plan.

My bet is that 90 percent of you married guys reading this article also have a traditional estate plan. What is it? Here’s the traditional plan Joe had (See if it sounds like your estate plan, as you read further).

Joe’s plan centers on two basic strategies: First, the plan takes advantage of the unified credit (actually $2 million is tax-free in 2006, 2007 and 2008; rising to $3.5 million in 2009. There is no tax in 2010. In 2011 the credit falls to $1 million). By using a two-trust arrangement (most often called Trust A and Trust B; marital trust and family trust or similar names), Joe and Mary each will escape tax on the amount of their unified credit, depending on their year of death. Second, the couple’s plan takes advantage of the marital deduction, which means zero estate tax when the first of Joe or Mary passes.

That’s it: the traditional estate plan that we see in all 50 states. That was Joe and Mary’s plan. Is your plan the same? Similar?

What’s the guaranteed result? The plan prevents the IRS from collecting a dime at the first death (of either Joe or Mary). Good! However, when the second spouse dies, the IRS gets its pound of flesh. In this couple’s case it’s a ton. If their wealth stayed the same, from today until the day both deceased, their estate tax would have been $4,655,000.

You’ll love the rest of the story.

Joe said, “Irv will you give me a second opinion?” I agreed. Joe sent me a standard package of information (tax returns and financial statements — both business and personal; family tree; and his estate plan documents). After two more telephone conversations, we pinned down Joe’s goals: for him and Mary, his successful business (wanted to leave it to his middle son) and his family (four kids and six grandchildren).

Three weeks later I called Joe and outlined the wealth transfer plan I had created (with the help of my network lawyer, Don). Joe’s family will receive every dime of his and Mary’s wealth, probably more (we actually created additional tax-free wealth because we took advantage of the tax-free environments, particularly strategies involving life insurance and charity — available in the tax law). Gone was the $4,655,000 estate tax obligation to the IRS.

A delighted Joe couldn’t help feeling ripped off by his lawyer’s traditional estate plan. Don and I explained that Mike’s plan was the norm.

After our comprehensive plan was reduced to writing (five new documents and some modifications to the trusts that Mike wrote), we submitted the new plan and documents to Mike. He was easy to work with. Don and I answered his stream of questions. Mike — after about three weeks of “review and research” (his words) — fully endorsed our plan.

For me this is a rewarding story, because it shows that the message we try to deliver — you can always win the estate tax game — is getting through to the readers of this column

If you are married and have a traditional estate plan (the same or similar to Joe’s), most likely your plan is not complete.

Think second opinion.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Yes, It’s OK To Beat Up The IRS — Legally, Of Course!

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

The facts, problems and solutions of this article are so typical of the readers of this column who call me for help, that I felt compelled to write about it.

Read slowly, chances are you will see some of yourself or someone you know.

Joe (age 74) owns 52 percent of an S corporation (Success Co.), and each of his three children owns 16 percent of Success Co. He has two boys, Tom (47) and Dick (43), who have been in business with Joe since they graduated from college.

Joe’s daughter, Harriet, was not and never will be involved in the business. Joe lost his first and only wife last year.

Following is a list of Joe’s assets:

• Various liquid investments:$190,000

• 52 percent of Success Co.: $1,630,000

• Real estate leased to Success Co.: $600,000

• Balance in Rollover IRA: $780,000

• Residence and summer home: $435,000

• Total: $3,635,000.

Joe’s lawyer (an estate planning expert with a fine reputation), who just completed Joe’s estate plan, correctly computed the estate tax (using 2011 rates) at $1,419,771. His only recommendation: Buy $1.5 million in insurance to pay the tax.

Joe called me for a second opinion. After a long telephone conference, following is how Joe spelled out his goals:

1. Control Success Co. (and the rest of his assets) for as long as he lives.

2. When he is gone, to have Success Co. owned 50 percent each by Tom and Dick.

3. Make sure he can maintain his lifestyle for as long as he lives.

4. The dollar value that Harriet receives from Joe’s estate should be equal to the amount received by each of her brothers.

5. Find a way to have each of his kids receive one-third of what he is worth now, all taxes paid in full. (Joe laughed a bit at this goal; he didn’t think it was possible).

Stop for a moment. Substitute you own list of assets and goals (remember, if you are married, some day either you or your spouse will be the first to pass on). What follows is the plan we implemented for Joe and the strategies we selected to accomplish Joe’s five specific goals (in the same order as the goals).

We recapitalized Success Co. (a tax-free transaction) so Joe now owned 52 percent of the controlling voting stock (52 of 100 shares) and 52 percent of the nonvoting stock (5,200 of 10,000 shares).

We transferred the liquid investments and the real estate to a family limited partnership (FLIP). As the general partner (owned 1 percent of the FLIP), Joe kept control of these assets. He will make annual gifts ($12,000 each) of limited partnership interests to the kids. These limited interests (99 percent of the FLIP) have no voting rights and are entitled to significant discounts (about 35 percent) for tax purposes. As a result, Joe can give about $19,000 to each kid of limited FLIP interests every year, yet for tax purposes the interests are only worth $12,000.

Joe sold the 5,200 shares of non-voting stock to a so-called defective trust (defective for income tax purposes) for $1.5 million plus interest. The trust paid for the stock with a note. Success Co. will distribute S Corporation dividends each year to the trust, which will then pay off the note to Joe.

Because the trust is defective for income tax purposes, every dime that Joe receives (both for principal to pay off the note and interest) is tax-free. The beneficiaries of the trust are Tom and Dick who will each own half of the 5,200 non-voting shares when the note is fully paid and the trust terminates.

Joe’s 52 voting shares will go to Tom and Dick when Joe dies. The shares owned by sister, Harriet, will be redeemed by Success Co., according to a new buy/sell agreement, when Joe passes on. Then Tom and Dick will each own 50 percent of Success Co.

Joe’s flow of cash to maintain his lifestyle would come from many sources. (a) a small salary from Success Co., plus all of his usual perks; (b) The note payments from the trust (remember, the entire $1.5 million plus the interest is tax-free to Joe because of the defective trust); and (c) distributions from the rollover IRA.

Actually, during the years (about eight to 10) while the note is being paid off, Joe will have more cash than he needs to live. This excess cash will be put into the FLIP (and, of course, will be available for distribution in future years).

Actually, all the assets of the FLIP will be available to Joe if needed.

As a final back up, Joe will enter into a death benefit agreement with Success Co. that will pay Joe $75,000 per year starting when Joe retires (probably never) and continuing until the day he dies.

We created a Subtrust (using the Rollover IRA and Success Co.) to purchase a $1.5 million life insurance policy. The entire $62,187 annual premium will be paid out of plan funds (it won’t cost Joe a penny), and because of the subtrust, none of the $1.5 million ultimate policy proceeds will be included in Joe’s estate.

Appropriate language in Joe’s death documents (will and revocable trust) makes sure Joe’s “goal” will be accomplished; the $1.5 million in tax-free insurance makes this goal easy.

The residence (worth $355,000) was transferred to a qualified personal residence trust (QPRT). The QPRT was set up in such a way that Joe could live in the residence for as long as he lived, yet it would be out of his estate.

If Joe gets hit by a bus the day after the plan described above is put in place, this “goal No. 5” (the entire $3,635,000 to the kids) will be accomplished (along with the four other goals). The longer Joe lives, the less the IRS gets and the more the kids get (in excess of the $3,635,000).

One warning: The above story does not explain all the technical details of Joe’s plan. Only work with a tax advisor who knows, understands and has worked with the strategies used for Joe.

A will and trust alone (no matter how long or how fancy) will not get the job done.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Featured, Planning | No Comments »

Don’t Let ‘Estate-Tax-Itis’ Drain The Family Wealth

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Adreaded disease is spreading like wildfire — in all 50 of the United States.

It debilitates most successful business owners, then, ravages some or all of the kids and eventually hurts the grandkids.

Known by various names, the most common name is “estate-tax-itus.” It drains family wealth.

Some people don’t even know they have the disease. Most know because they have the painful symptoms (a huge tax bill) and search in vain for a cure. They attend seminars, read articles, special reports and books. They go from advisor to advisor looking for relief.

The key question is: “Is there a cure?”

The answer is a resounding :Yes!”

This article shows you how to start the process to totally cure estate-tax-itus for yourself, your family and your business — every time, no matter how young or old you are, whether you are worth $1 million, $10 million (or much more).

There are many ways to fight the disease, but the best way is to build a “tax-immune system.” For best results, start today.

Here’s a three-step process that works every time. Steps No. 1 and No. 2 make the diagnosis. Step No. 3 accomplishes the cure.

Step No. 1: Prepare a personal financial statement for you and your spouse. Divide your assets into the following five categories.

— Residence

— Business

— Qualified plans (pension, profit-sharing, 401(k), rollover IRA or other qualified plans)

— All other assets (typically, investments)

— Life insurance

Step No. 2: Make a list of your goals (actually three lists) — (1) for you and (if married) your spouse; (2) for your family (typically children and grandchildren); and (3) your business.

Here are the typical core goals we see in practice:

For list (1) — Maintain your lifestyle for as long as you (husband and wife) live and allow you to control your assets for as long as you live;

For list (2) — transfer your assets to the children and grandchildren intact — free of the estate tax-and educate your grandchildren;

For list (3) — transfer your business to the business child (or children) tax-free and treat the non-business children fairly.

Step. No. 3: Find an advisor who knows how to identify and implement the exact tax strategies that accomplish your goals using the specific assets on your financial statement.

Following are the are most often-used strategies we use in our practice to accomplish a typical client’s goals, based on the assets owned.

Your Residence. Use a Qualified personal residence trust to remove the residence from your estate, yet live in it and control it for as long as you live.

Your Business. Transfer your business to the business children using an Intentionally Defective Trust. It removes the business from your estate, transfers business to kids (tax-free to you and the kids), yet allows you to keep control for life (because you retain voting control).

Qualified plans. The funds in these plans are double-taxed, robbing your family of about 75 percent of the plan funds (i.e. the tax collectors get about $750,000 if you have $1 million in the plans, your family receives only $250.000).

Create a Subtrust or retirement plan rescue (RPR) to buy life insurance. This usually triples (or more) the amount you have in the plan, and your heirs get it all tax-free. For example, $1 million in the plan (worth only $250,000 to your family) will turn into $3 million (or more) for your family with a Subtrust or a RPR. And the entire $3 million is tax-free.

All other assets. Transfer these assets (all your assets, except those in the first three categories; for example, publicly traded stocks, bonds, real estate and other investments) to a family limited partnership, which legally reduces the value of these assets for tax purposes by 35 percent (yes, $1 million of real estate, stocks, bonds, etc. are only worth only $650,000 for tax purposes.)

Insurance. Get it out of your corporation and transfer all policies you or your spouse own to an irrevocable life insurance trust (But a Subtrust is best, if you can use it. See 3. above). Also, check out premium financing, a wonderful concept that allows you to buy huge amounts of life insurance ($3 million, $10 million or more) without paying premiums.

Finally, if your estate plan is already done, and it does not effectively eliminate the estate tax, get a second opinion.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, Investment Strategies, Planning | No Comments »

A Big valuation victory For Our Side

Monday, April 13th, 2009

I’d like to hug every judge who had a hand in this classic Tax Court decision: [Estate of Davis, 110 TC 35, 6/30/98]. Instead of giving all the dull facts and all the technical stuff in the case, this article deals with what the result means to you, the average business owner who someday must value your business for tax purposes.

You (Joe) operate your family business (Success Co.) as a corporation. The assets of Success Co. include a number of appreciated assets; for example, investments in stocks, land and buildings. Also many assets subject to deprecation — mostly equipment — are on the books for much less than their current value. Now suppose Success Co. is correctly valued at $5 million. The value of the various assets that Success Co. owes is $4 million, but has only a book value of $3 million. So, if Success Co. were to sell the assets or actually liquidated (neither Joe nor Success Co. intend to sell the assets or liquidate), there would be a $1 million profit. Say the tax (state and federal) on the profit would be $400,000. The question that faced the court was could the value of the corporation be reduced by $400,000 to $4.6 million? “Yes,” said the court, turning thumbs down on the IRS’s claim to ignore this built-in-gains discount (actually the potential tax due for an asset sale or corporate liquidation).

Applause! Applause! for the court. Think about it: That discount of $400,000 could save Joe about $210,000 in estate taxes.

As a practical matter, this case allows you to take three distinct valuation discounts: (1) a discount for lack of marketability; (2) discount for built-in gains of assets, even if you don’t intend to sell them or liquidate (technically a part of the marketability discount); and (3) a discount for minority interest if you are transferring 50 percent or less of your stock to one person (for example, Joe Gives 30 percent of his Success Co. stock to each of his two children). After these three discounts, a $5 million company may only be worth in the $3 million range for tax purposes. Or a $2 million discount, yielding estate tax savings of about $1.1 million. Truly a great victory!

Now a personal puff of pride for our office, which has a large valuation department. We have been taking similar discounts for built-in gains for years.

The right value of your business, whether transferring to your kids, for estate planning or for other purposes, is one of the most important tax-impact considerations in the law.

Do you have a business valuation problem — particularly if you want to transfer your business to another family member — that is driving you up the proverbial “tax wall?” Then you are welcome to call me (847-674-5295). Let’s chat about your exact situation.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Business appraisal protects your family from unnecessary taxation.

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

Do you know how to make a grown man cry? Tell him his business has been destroyed by fire, flood or an act of God.

Yes, a tragedy. Bad stuff. But, most likely, the loss was insured — a bit of help. It’s even more important if Joe Owner is there on the scene to assess the damage, make plans and start rebuilding. Chances are he will make the business bigger and better than before.

End of Scene 1.

Here is Scene 2. Even the most successful, egotistical and immortal business owner knows that some day he must go to the “big business in the sky.” That will not make Joe Owner cry. He is too realistic for that. But tell him that after he is gone, his present plans, or better yet — lack of a plan — mean the Internal Revenue Service will dismantle his business.

Imagine our departed Joe in heaven; sitting on a cloud; talking to a representative of the revenue service. Joe speaks first.

“Why?” he asks.

“To pay taxes,” answers the tax representative.

“How?” he asks.

“By selling off the assets necessary to pay the tax.”

“When?” he asks.

“Within two years.”

“Why?” Joe demands.

“To pay your federal estate tax liability.”

“How much?” he queries.

“That depends on the value of your business.”

“Good,” says Joe. “I can show you just how little the business is worth without me.”

“Sorry,” responds the IRS representative. “It’s too late for that now.”

The curtain goes down.

Welcome back to earth. Is the above scenario realistic? Yes.

Crazy as it sounds.

If you own a closely held business and don’t pin down its value for tax purposes while you are alive, you are setting yourself up to be mugged by the IRS.

Every business — like it or not — must some day be valued for tax purposes. It is best for it to be done voluntarily, by you (the owner) during life. If not, the valuation will be done in an involuntary situation, after death, by the revenue service.

The only “out” is to sell the business in a real transaction during your life. For most business owners, selling doesn’t make sense for many reasons.

The two most common reasons are: First, the typical business owner wants to transfer the business to his or her kids; or second, wants to keep on working until he or she goes to business heaven.

The message should be clear: Want to save your business and your family untold aggravation, not to mention savings of 55 percent, the highest estate tax bracket in 2011? Then do three things: Find out the value of your business for tax purposes by getting an appraisal. Put a transfer plan, usually to your kids, in place during your life.

And then dovetail the first two steps with your estate plan.

Done right, you can transfer your business to your kids tax-free during your life, beat the estate tax collector legally, and control your business for as long as you live.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, General Tax Strategies, Insurance, Tax Strategies | No Comments »