Two phone calls – in the same week – from readers of this column rang my (it’s-time-to-write-a-succession-planning-article) bell. The first call is a succession planning horror story. The caller loses millions (unnecessarily) to the IRS. The second call makes me want to explode: another spent-a-lot-of-money-on-lawyers-and-still-don’t-know-what-to-do tax tragedy.
First, we’ll spell out the facts behind each call… then, the succession problems… and finally, you’ll be surprised (and delighted) by the simple solutions in both cases.
If you are a business owner with a succession plan problem, chances are you are about to learn how to avoid your own Achilles’ heel pain. And avoid losing a ton of taxes to the IRS.
The first caller (Joe) sold his business (Success Co.) to his sons (Sam and Sid) four years ago for $3 million, payable over eight years, plus interest at 5.25% on the unpaid balance. Today the balance due is $1.4 million.
Let’s assess the tax damage to Joe and his sons. First the boys: Sam and Sid are in a 40% tax bracket (State and Federal combined). To have $1 million (after-tax) to pay their Dad, they must earn $1.66 million, then pay $660,000 in income tax. Since the price is $3 million, the ultimate income tax burden to the boys will be $1,980,000 (3 X $660,000). Severe tax pain!
How will Joe be taxed? Well, his tax basis for his Success Co. stock (100% of the company) was $287,000 (let’s round it to $300,000). So, Joe’s capital gain over the eight years will be $2.7 million ($3 million less $300,000). What’s his capital gains tax?… A mere $405,000 ($2.7 million X 15%).
Can you believe this tragic tax picture? The boys must make $4,980,000, while the family gets eaten alive by a total tax burden of $2,385,000 ($1,980,000 for Sam and Sid, plus
09-12(2)
$405,000 for dad). Only $2,595,000 left out of that $4,980,000… truly a tax travesty.
NOTE: Since the boys can deduct the interest paid to their dad, while Joe must pay tax on this interest, the net tax result is a wash.
Now, the $2,385,000 question… Is there some way that Joe and the boys could have avoided that $2,385,000 tax? The answer is a resounding YES!
How? Joe should have transferred the stock to Sam and Sid using an intentionally defective trust (IDT). An IDT is a simple, quick and easy strategy: Joe sells the Success Co. stock to the IDT for a $3 million note. The cash flow of Success Co. is used to pay the note, plus interest. When the note is paid, the trustee distributes the stock to the beneficiaries: Sam and Sid. Neither Sam nor Sid pay even one penny in taxes for the stock. Because an IDT is intentionally defective for income tax purposes, Joe – courtesy of the IDT tax law – receives the entire $3 million, plus interest tax-free… not one cent in capital gains tax or income tax.
NOTE: The interest paid to Joe via the IDT is not deductible.
What are the tax savings?… $2,385,000 as explained above. It should be noted that the transaction is structured in such a way that Joe keeps control of Success Co. until the day he dies (or until paid in full)… his choice.
MY ADVICE: Want to sell your closely held business stock to your kids? (or other relatives, key employees, or fellow – nonrelated – stockholders)… Look into an IDT.
Now, let’s take a look at the second caller’s succession problem: Sam owns 10% of Good Co. He is one of a total of 10 stockholders (I nicknamed them the “Big Ten”), each owning 10% of Good Co. All are children of four brothers who started the business years ago.
The Big Ten are all in their 50s, healthy and each has one or more of their own kids.
Here’s the current scorecard concerning whether any of the Big Ten’s kids might ultimately join Good Co.:
09-12(3)
What do they do about a succession plan for Good Co.? Everybody, including the many professional advisors the Big Ten have consulted, is stumped.
Now, all you family owned or closely held businesses that have two or more stockholders, listen up. The problem is the same (or similar) when you have multiple shareholders, whether two or ten (or more).
Following is the basic succession plan that we create when there are multiple shareholders (using Good Co. as an example):
#1. Each shareholders is treated as owning 100% of his 10% of the company stock.
So each shareholder is given the freedom to deal with the stock he owns, as long as it does not interfere with the operation of the company or the other shareholders.
For example, Sam (the caller) has a son (Tom) already working for Good Co. Sam will continue to work for Good Co. He can sell (probably using an IDT), gift or leave his stock to Tom when he dies… or some combination. The significant point is that Sam should not be forced by the Good Co. buy/sell agreement to sell his stock to the Company or his fellow stockholders when he retires or dies.
#2. Those shareholders who currently have no children working at Good Co. would be a party to a buy/sell agreement, which is insurance funded. Each time one of the Big Ten dies, the policy death benefit would be used to buy the deceased’s stock.
#3. What happens when a #2 shareholder (no kids in business) becomes a #1 shareholder (now has a kid(s) join the Good Co. work force)? The new #1 shareholder is no longer subject to the terms of the buy/sell agreement, and (if he wants to) can buy his insurance policy from the company for its cash surrender value.
09-12(4)
I know, I know!… You have a question about your specific succession problem. Remember, it would take a large book to cover every possible succession situation. But what is interesting, in practice, the above information (about the two callers) will solve about 98% of the succession problems I have seen over the past 40 years.
Still got a question… call me (Irv) at 847-674-5295.
by Irv Blackman
First and foremost, Irv Blackman is both a CPA and a lawyer. Irv is a tax guy. Stay tuned to the site by signing up for the RSS feed.