Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Estate Planning Turns into Lifetime Planning

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Mr. Courage Leads the Way

The story you are about to read has all the ingredients to make you cheer, applaud and cry. Yes, it’s an estate planning story. But more than that, it’s an inspiring story of one man’s courage.
Webster’s dictionary defines courage as the “ability to conquer fear or despair.” The hero – let’s call him Mr. Courage – of this story is a real-life perfect example of that definition.

Mr. Courage, a long-time reader of this column, called and asked me to do his estate plan… quickly. “Why quickly?” I asked. He replied, “Because I have cancer.” The doctor would not (or maybe could not) give an exact time frame as to how long Mr. Courage might live, but thought getting his affairs in order was a good idea. Never once during our initial phone call – or those that followed – did Mr. Courage even give a hint that he was or would become downtrodden. In a word, he was upbeat. Mr. Courage explained his attitude this way, “How lucky I am to know that the end may be near, yet have time to put my house in order.” Wow!

The very next day a package arrived via courier (sent by Mr. Courage’s wife Mary) with the information I had requested concerning Mr. Courage, Mary, their business and their family. Included in the package was a surprise document (SD) that blew my socks off. More about that SD later.

First, the basic facts for the estate planning story. Mr. Courage is 56-years old. Mary is six months older and is active in the business, Potential Co. They have four kids, but only one, Sam (age 26), is active in the business. There is one key employee, Sid who is considered like family.

Potential Co. (an S corporation owned 100% by Mr. Courage) made $180,000 for the last full fiscal year, yet had a negative equity of $232,000. “Small potatoes,” you’ll say.
But Mr. Courage, Sam and Sid had a plan, in writing (but not yet a signed legal document) for Mr. Courage to sell Potential Co. to Sam and Sid for $2 million. Each of the boys would sign a note for $1 million.
Note: As you will see later, the $2 million price (which seems high) is actually a bargain.

Do you (the reader of this column) intend to sell your business to your kid(s) or employee(s)? If so, read what follows carefully. You are about to become a happy seller. This story of Mr. Courage is just an extreme example of typical succession planning (transferring a business), when the business owner wants to sell the business to either his kids or employees. Almost always, the kids or the employees don’t have any money. So, like it or not, the business owner must get paid in installments over a number of years.

The buyer [kid(s)/employee(s)] pays the seller with a note. Two problems are immediately created. First, the buyer’s – already slim net worth – balance sheet is totally destroyed for years to come. Also, the buyer must use the cash flow of the business that was purchased to pay the seller’s note. This sad fact makes it difficult – sometimes impossible – to get a bank loan (needed to fund the future growth of the business).
Second, the tax consequences of the transaction are a disaster for the buyer. Here’s why. Suppose the price for the business is $1 million and the tax rate (State and Federal combined) is 40%. The sad fact is that he buyer must earn $1.667 million dollars and pay $667,000 in taxes to have $1 million left (to pay to the seller).

Here are the horrible consequences: Sam and Sid must earn $3.333 million, pay $1.333 million in income tax in order to pay off their $2 million notes. (Apply those astronomical tax numbers to any business sale/or purchase you are contemplating). It’s nuts. What did we do?… Instead of an installment sale, we used an (intentionally defective trust) (IDT). This IDT strategy allows Sam and Sid to use the future cash flow of Potential Co. to purchase the business. An IDT is tax-free to the buyer. Also, the seller pays no capital gains tax on the gain realized from the transfer of the stock to the buyer. An IDT puts more dollars in the seller’s pocket, after taxes… while the buyer pays no taxes.

In addition, the personal balance sheets of Sam and Sid will not show a liability for the purchase price of Potential Co. Banks usually finance a profitable business, but almost always require the guarantee of the business owner (the stronger his/her balance sheet, the better). Now let’s talk about that surprise document (SD). But first a reminder – that regular readers of this column know – concerning lifetime planning: For years I have preached that an estate plan is incomplete unless it includes a comprehensive lifetime plan: the unknown period of time from the day you begin to think about an estate plan until the day you get hit by the final bus.

What is, Mr. Courage’s SD?… A Strategic Plan for Potential Co. that was created with the help of Sam and Sid. This Strategic Plan is awesome. Thorough. Detailed (but only 18 pages long). It covers the short-term and the long-term. It has, is and should continue to have a positive impact on many lives for two or more generations. The plan is accompanied by a budget (really a detailed spread sheet setting revenue and profit goals for each month for two years). Hallelujah! Potential Co. is hitting those budget numbers. If the numbers hold – and every indication is that they will – profit (before taxes) for the first full year will be in the $500,000 range.

Wait, there’s more. Toward the end of the SD is a brilliant analysis of the market place Potential Co. serves. Great demographics. Potential gross income for 100% of the market. That they can capture 25% of the market… and how they will do it. If they do it, Sam and Sid, will become mega-millionaires.
I’m bett’n the boys will make it.

You’ll notice that this article does not include any details about the estate plan we created for Mr. Courage and Mary. I did it on purpose. Why?… Want you to focus on two things if you own a business that will ultimately be owned by your kid(s) or employee(s) (or both). First. Do not (and I mean never) sell your business to your kids. Use an intentionally defective trust. You and the kids will save a ton of taxes.
Second. Yes, your estate plan should do the traditional stuff: will(s), trust(s), appropriate insurance, etc. Put it in the safe and forget about it. The most important plan (no matter what your age) is your lifetime plan. The purpose of the lifetime plan is to maximize your wealth (while you control your wealth – particularly your business – for as long as you live). Your lifetime plan should solve, for example, such problems as: maintaining your lifestyle (and your spouse’s) for as long as you live; educate your kids or grandkids; create a buy/sell agreement for the kids to make sure the business stays in the family (in case of divorce); maximize the profitability of the business and minimize income tax.

Of course, your lifetime plan and estate plan must dovetail. This means that all of your wealth – no matter how large it might grow – should go to your family (kids and grandkids in most cases). Simply put, if you’re worth $7 million when you die, every dollar of that $7 million to your family (all taxes, if any, paid in full)… if $70 million, then $70 million. Go ahead, fill in your own “guestimated number.”

Finally, say a prayer for Mr. Courage.

Estate Planning for Special Guys

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

In your second marriage…or about to marry…or have significant other.

After business hours the American male business owner likes company… female company. My experience – as a tax planner – with guys who have lost their former brides (via death or divorce) could fill a book. A big book. From a tax-planning viewpoint, once the first (could be second, third, etc.) marriage ends, the ex-husband falls into one of three distinct categories. Each category requires different economic and tax strategies. Let’s take ‘em one at a time.

Already married the second (third, etc.) time around

This is by far the biggest group… with the biggest estate tax problems, economic problems and a host of other potential problems. Following is a partial list of the most common facts and circumstances that cause the problems (later we’ll discuss how to solve these never-ending problems). Joe’s new bride is Mary.

  1. Age difference: two 60-year-olds (or any other close ages) is a different tax ballgame as compared to when Joe is 15 (or more) years older than Mary.
  2. Health issues (When serious, tax planning must be hurried).
  3. Kids: The possibilities are endless… only Joe has kids (from prior marriage); only Mary has kids; both have own kids; it’s a triple-header… his/hers and our kids; the kids get along with each other or don’t; kids love or hate the step-parent; kids marry and some or all of the family hates the son-in-law or daughter-in-law; Joe adopts Mary’s kids or does not; and we could go on and on.
  4. There is no premarital agreement… or there is one (that leaves Mary little or nothing). It’s nice when the marriage lasts for the long-term, has been great and both Joe and Mary want to ignore all (or part) of the premarital documents.
  5. One or more of the kids (could be his/hers or ours) is in the business and one or more of the kids are not. There are two major issues: (a) When there is more than one kid who will ultimately own the business, how do you treat the business kids equally (or some other ratio that you want), yet give control to the clear leader (assuming there is a clear leader) when dad retires or dies? (b) How do you treat the business kid(s) and non-business kid(s) fairly?
  6. And finally, the major problem facing the typical Joe and Mary: Joe wants to provide for Mary (really maintain her lifestyle) if he gets hit by the proverbial bus first… but he wants to leave as much as possible to his own kids.

NOTE: The above does not pretend to cover every problem between him and her in any second marriage, but it covers the six problems seen most often in a real-life estate planning practice.

Let’s solve the toughest problem (6. above) first. A QTIP (qualified terminable interest property) is the perfect solution. In a nutshell, here’s the two-step strategy:

  • Step #1: Joe transfers his business – tax-free – to the business kids using an intentional defective trust (IDT). The IDT gets Joe’s business out of his estate while Joe is alive, yet Joe keeps control of the business until he draws his last breath.
  • Step #2: All of Joe’s other assets – typically the resident(s), the IRA(s) [all other qualified plans – such as a 401(k) or profit-sharing plan – have been rolled into an IRA during Joe’s life] and investment type assets (such as real estate, stocks, bonds and other investments) go into the Q-TIP at Joe’s death. Mary has a life estate: living in the residence to the day she dies and enjoying the income from the other assets for as long as she lives. No estate tax is due at Joe’s death. What happens when Mary dies? The Q-TIP show is over. All of the assets go to Joe’s children (and/or grandchildren). Estate tax is now due based on the value of the assets that pass to the children (or grandchildren). Second-to-die life insurance usually is
    purchased on Joe and Mary to cover the estate tax due when Mary dies. The premiums on second-to-die life insurance are significantly less than buying insurance on only Joe’s life. Also, the death benefit comes immediately after the second of Joe and Mary dies… when that ornery estate tax is due. The documents – the will and trusts – that contain the rest of the estate plan for Joe and Mary have the appropriate clauses and language to deal with each and every of the problems and issues listed above. Over the years, with the exception of curing health issues and settling family quarrels, the provisions in the various estate planning documents (usually a trust) solve the items listed above.
    Once we finish the planning for clients in this second marriage category, the clients are amazed. We continually hear comments like “Wow!”… “Ingenious!”… “Didn’t think you could do it.” Should the truth be known it’s not a matter of smarts. But experience is really our secret. We’ve done it before… hundreds of times.

NOTE: If you have a health issue, start your estate planning NOW. Time becomes critical. As a result, we service health-issue clients first and fast.

NOTE: How do we keep the kids equal, yet give control to the clear leader when transferring Joe’s business?… We create voting (say 100 shares) and non-voting stock (say 10,000 shares). The clear leader gets enough extra voting shares to have voting control and is shorted an equal number of non-voting shares.

Ready to tie the knot…again

Do it. But before you say “I do,” the about-to-be bride and groom mustMUST sign a prenuptial agreement. Failure to do so makes a lot of unhappy campers… particularly the spouse with the most wealth.

If the marriage becomes a winner, it’s easy to blow off the prenuptial and play the estate planning game as described above in Category #1.

You have a significant other

When I ask, “Will you marry down-the-road?”… the answers vary from “No,” to “Maybe,” to “Someday.” Or some variation.
Whatever the answer when the relationship is solid and for the long-term, then Joe is committed to taking care of Mary (maintaining her lifestyle if she outlives Joe). What’s the estate tax problem? Because Joe and Mary are not married, there is no marital deduction… No Q-TIP. If Joe dies before Mary, the estate tax is due NOW. With a Q-TIP (we learned in Category #1), the monster estate tax is not due until both Joe and Mary have gone to heaven.

So what is the plan? We create a Q-TIP-type trust. We fund the trust with the assets needed to maintain Mary’s lifestyle: typically the residence and income producing assets. Mary has a life estate only, living in the residence and receiving the income from the assets. At her death the assets go to Joe’s kids and grand kids. The only fly in the ointment is that the estate tax is due at Joe’s death. When Joe is insurable, insurance on his life is the simple answer . Of course, the policy death benefit (D/B) must be set up (usually an irrevocable life insurance trust) so none of the D/B is subject to estate tax.
One final comment: The many problems (and the even more solid tax-winning solutions to those problems) of this article’s subject matter cannot be covered in just one article. So be warned: Start your planning – call and make an appointment today – with an experienced professional. Done right, everyone – except the IRS – wins. Done wrong, only you – and your loved ones – lose.

Have a question?… Call me (Irv) at 847-674-5295.

Winning the tax game for a family business requires solving two sets of problems: money, and human

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

Recently, I read an article titled, “What Makes For Success?” by Kemmons Wilson, the founder of Holiday Inn. He said, “It is great to attain wealth, but money is really just one way – and hardly the best way – to keep score.”
Interesting quote, huh? Most readers of this column call me with tax problems because they have attained wealth (no doubt they have and do keep score in money), and they don’t want to share that wealth with the IRS…Perfectly normal. Yet, it’s amazing… Once the reader realizes that we really do know how to pass their wealth – all of it and intact – to their family, the conversation turns to other ways that they might keep score. Sure, they are delighted to find there are legal ways to totally win the estate tax game. But they readily admit that they don’t know how to deal with the other problems (other ways to keep score).
The other problems fall into the category of little kids, little problems; big kids, big problems. Stuff like which of my kids should run the business?… How do I treat the kids fairly?… What about the non-business kids?… What happens if one (or more) of my kids gets divorced?… How do I take care of my wife (the second one who is 15 years – or more –younger than the caller)? The callers tell me about family problems, business problems and/or assorted personal problems. To me every word is important, even though I’ve listened to so many tales of woe before (but although similar, each problem has its own peculiar twists and turns).
Let’s face it. Stuff happens. After years of solving wealth transfer, business succession (usually the business is at center stage) and estate planning problems, experience has taught me that solving only the money problems can never yield a perfect plan.
The human stuff – your spouse and kids support your plan – must be solved too.
What about your son-in-law or daughter-in-law?… A hate or love relationship? I know, it sounds like cornball. But if you really want to win the game of life after you have won the money game (really the easy part), you must attempt to solve the human part…the emotional stuff.
Here’s my suggestion to start the process. Make two lists: the money-problem list/the human-problem list. Solve the money-problem list first (usually you are home free if you solve these three money problems: (1) maintain your lifestyle – and your spouse’s – for as long as you live: (2) transfer your business to the business kids… tax-free; and (3) kill the estate tax.
Then, it’s easier to tackle the human-problem list. Interesting, many times solving the money problems solves some (often all) of the human problems. Finally, you must work with experienced professionals who know how to solve both problems: the money problems and the emotional human stuff that comes with accumulating wealth and trying to pass it on.
One more thing: each piece of your plan must be part of a single comprehensive and integrated plan, all implemented at the same time. Piecemeal planning, based on my 50-plus years of experience, is a disaster that not only enriches the IRS, but fails to satisfy the normal human desires of a typical family.
Call Irv Blackman 847-674-5295 if you want to talk about your stuff: The money problems… The human problems… Or both.

Want to learn how to turn your qualified plans from a dangerous tax trap into a great tax advantaged victory

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

There are many types of qualified plans: pension, profit-sharing, 401(k) and IRAs are the most popular. True enough, each is a great tax strategy if you ultimately need the plan funds for retirement and (1) you are in a low tax bracket when you take the funds out of the plan and (2) your estate is not large enough to kick up an estate tax problem. Perfect for over 90 percent of American taxpayers.
But what happens if you are in the highest income tax bracket when you retire and you have an estate tax problem (say the highest bracket of 45 percent)? Sorry, the IRS has you in a tax trap. No matter when the funds are taken out of the plan (during your life or after your death), the IRS gets 67 percent of the dollars in your qualified plans. Your family only gets 33 percent. The tax trap has been sprung. A tax travesty!
Is there any way out of the trap? Actually, my network of working-together professionals has developed several strategies. The one we use most often is called a “subtrust.”
Here’s a typical example of how a real client used a subtrust: Joe and his wife Mary are both 60 years old. They needed $2 million of second-to-die life insurance to solve their estate tax problem. The premium cost was $22,400 per year; a bit more than Joe wanted to spend. Joe’s 401(k) plan had $400,000 in it. Joe sadly understood that his $400,000 would only net his family $132,000 ($400,000 times 33 percent).
Here’s what we did. We set up a subtrust as part of the 401(k) plan (Plan). The subtrust will pay the annual premium after receiving the funds from the Plan. Since the policy is actually an asset of the Plan, the annual premium payment is a tax-free transaction.
When both Joe and Mary pass on, their family will receive the full $2 million in policy proceeds. No income tax. No gift tax. No estate tax. The subtrust tax strategy, in this case, actually turns $132,000 after-taxes into $2 million after-taxes (actually more because a portion of the original $400,000 401(k) plan funds, plus earnings, will still be in the plan).
If you have $300,000 (or more) in one or more qualified plans (for example, profit-sharing, 401(k) and IRA) and have an estate tax problem, you are in a tax trap. Want to learn more about how a subtrust and other strategies that can get you out of your qualified plan tax trap? Send me (Irv Blackman) a fax at (847-674-5299); include (1) name and birthday; (2) same for your spouse; (3) total amount in all of your qualified plans: and (4) all phone numbers where you can be reached. Mark “Eagle 09-23” at the top of your fax.

Why Your Estate Tax Plan Often Flunks The Real-Life Test

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

While thumbing through the pages of a trade journal, I ran across this quote, “We install 90 percent of what we sell. That’s one big advantage we have over (names one of the biggest square-footage discount chains).”

You know the routine: the thing-a-ma-jig doesn’t work. “The manufacturer,” says the installer; “improperly installed,” counters the manufacturer.

Ultimately-after some grief and probably more dollars — and it works.

Now, there’s a game you don’t want to play with your estate plan. Try this real-life tax horror story.

Joe died, survived by his wife, Mary, three grown kids (one managed Joe’s family business, Success Co.) and seven grandchildren. Success Co. was a C corporation. Aside from owning their residence (worth $800,000) and Success Co. (valued at $10.3 million at Joe’s death), before Joe died, he and Mary enjoyed about $350,000 of after-tax spendable personal income. In addition, they owned various personal property and a nice summer home with a total value of over $1 million.

About five years before he died, Joe gathered a team of professionals to do his estate plan: his CPA, a lawyer who specialized in estate planning and his long-time friend, an insurance agent.

The professionals crafted a good traditional estate plan: no tax due at Joe’s death (the marital deduction) and enough insurance (second-to-die) to pay the projected estate tax at Mary’s death. An irrevocable life insurance trust owned the second-to-die policy on Joe’s and Mary’s lives.

The estate plan probably would get an “A” in the classroom. But here’s the unfortunate big lifetime detail the professional team missed:

Mary, a healthy age 64, did not have enough cash flow to maintain her lifestyle. Joe’s $550,000 salary, plus generous perks from Success Co., stopped when he died.

Aside from the usual lifestyle cash needs, Mary needed $46,000 per year to pay the second-to-die insurance premium. Also, she wanted to continue providing for the college education of three of her grandchildren (the other five had completed their education paid for by Joe and Mary).

None of the professionals accepted responsibility for Mary’s lack of necessary spendable income. Worse yet, they had no suggestions to solve the problem.

First, the solution to Mary’s immediate problem: the cash flow to maintain her lifestyle. The marital trust (created in Joe’s revocable trust as part of his estate plan) owned 90 percent of Success Co. (Mary owned the other 10 percent). We simply had the stockholders (the marital trust and Mary) elect S Corporation status for Success Co.

Now the large corporate profit can provide the income stream Mary needs, as the beneficiary of the marital trust (90 percent) and as a direct owner (10 percent).

What lesson should be learned from this sad tale? The first lesson is that estate planning (as practiced all over the United States) is really death planning, put ’em in the vault and wait to die. Do the documents (a will and a trust or two).

Rather than rehash what should have been done for Joe and Mary, let’s get the first lesson up on the board — loud and clear.

Whether you call it estate planning, lifetime planning, wealth transfer planning or whatever, your master plan must include three separate plans:

(1) a lifetime plan to transfer your wealth while you are alive (and, yes you can control your wealth for as long as you live);

(2) a retirement plan that provides the after-tax cash flow needed to maintain your lifestyle for you (and your spouse) for as long as you (or your spouse) live;

(3) a transfer/succession plan for your business (that gets the value of the business out of your estate tax-free) to your business kids (or other successor).

Whether your master plan is done or is yet to be done, make sure it includes the three plans listed above. And always get an independent second opinion.

Finally, make sure that the professionals who create your plan know in advance they are responsible for all aspects: he who creates the plan should install it and monitor it to the day you (and your spouse) die.

A Big valuation victory For Our Side

Monday, April 13th, 2009

I’d like to hug every judge who had a hand in this classic Tax Court decision: [Estate of Davis, 110 TC 35, 6/30/98]. Instead of giving all the dull facts and all the technical stuff in the case, this article deals with what the result means to you, the average business owner who someday must value your business for tax purposes.

You (Joe) operate your family business (Success Co.) as a corporation. The assets of Success Co. include a number of appreciated assets; for example, investments in stocks, land and buildings. Also many assets subject to deprecation — mostly equipment — are on the books for much less than their current value. Now suppose Success Co. is correctly valued at $5 million. The value of the various assets that Success Co. owes is $4 million, but has only a book value of $3 million. So, if Success Co. were to sell the assets or actually liquidated (neither Joe nor Success Co. intend to sell the assets or liquidate), there would be a $1 million profit. Say the tax (state and federal) on the profit would be $400,000. The question that faced the court was could the value of the corporation be reduced by $400,000 to $4.6 million? “Yes,” said the court, turning thumbs down on the IRS’s claim to ignore this built-in-gains discount (actually the potential tax due for an asset sale or corporate liquidation).

Applause! Applause! for the court. Think about it: That discount of $400,000 could save Joe about $210,000 in estate taxes.

As a practical matter, this case allows you to take three distinct valuation discounts: (1) a discount for lack of marketability; (2) discount for built-in gains of assets, even if you don’t intend to sell them or liquidate (technically a part of the marketability discount); and (3) a discount for minority interest if you are transferring 50 percent or less of your stock to one person (for example, Joe Gives 30 percent of his Success Co. stock to each of his two children). After these three discounts, a $5 million company may only be worth in the $3 million range for tax purposes. Or a $2 million discount, yielding estate tax savings of about $1.1 million. Truly a great victory!

Now a personal puff of pride for our office, which has a large valuation department. We have been taking similar discounts for built-in gains for years.

The right value of your business, whether transferring to your kids, for estate planning or for other purposes, is one of the most important tax-impact considerations in the law.

Do you have a business valuation problem — particularly if you want to transfer your business to another family member — that is driving you up the proverbial “tax wall?” Then you are welcome to call me (847-674-5295). Let’s chat about your exact situation.

Beware of Johnny-One-Note estate planning

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Writing this column is fun.

Even more fun is consulting with column readers to solve their real-life family and tax problems.

When a reader consults with me, I ask him/her to send some basic data, including a copy of their current estate plan. Recently, a small parade of readers have asked me to review — or give a second opinion on — what I call “Johnny-one-note estate planning.”

If your estate plan is done or is in the process of being done, the rest of this item is “must” reading. Estate plans that are built around one main theme (Johnny-one-note) do not play well in the complex world of dozens of concepts available to eliminate the estate tax.

Of the last 31 plans I have reviewed, 26 were based on a single theme. The runaway winner (really a loser in tax-saving effectiveness) is the creation of a revocable trust (RT) — one for him and one for her, where a married couple is involved.

An RT for married folks is a good start to an estate plan, but its only good tax trick is to defer the big estate tax bite until the death of the second spouse.

Two other strategies that I see regularly as Johnny-one-notes are the sale of a business to the kids by the business-owner dad (SALE) and family limited partnerships (FLIPs).

A SALE is often used as a strategy to sell your business to your kids (usually on an installment basis). Never, but never, have I seen a sale of a family-owned business as a tax-effective way to transfer a business to the next generation. Instead, take a look at an intentionally defective trust (IDT), which is the best way to transfer a business tax-free from Dad/Mom to the business kids.

A FLIP is usually not an effective way to deal with a business, a residence, or money in an IRA, profit-sharing plan or similar plan. But it’s a wonderful tax-saving starting point for almost every other asset you might own (stocks, bonds, real estate, you name it.) Properly used, you can 97-26(2) control the assets for life, protect them from the claims of creditors, and reduce their value for estate tax purposes immediately by 30 percent to 40 percent.

For example, say your transfer $1.5 million of investment assets (stocks, bonds, real estate) to a FLIP. For estate tax purposes, the assets are only worth about $1 million, resulting in estate tax savings of about $250,000.

This column over the years has covered RTs, IDTs and FLIPs in detail.

One way you can tell if your estate plan is really properly done is by looking at the estate tax liability if you and your spouse get hit by that proverbial truck.

Whether the liability is $500,000, $5 million or more, your estate plan needs a second opinion.

Why?

Your target should always be to move all your wealth — intact — to your family (for example, if you’re worth $5 million, then the entire $5 million to your family; $50 million, the entire $50 million, etc.).

Following is a list of the six most common strategies we use to transfer your wealth — intact —and eliminate estate taxes. In parenthesis following each strategy is the type of assets you should own to consider the concept.

(1) Qualified personal residence or QPRT (residence).

(2) IDT (your family business).

(3) Subtrust (junk money and other strategies if you have a total of more than $350,000 in your IRA, profit-sharing or similar plan).

(4) Charitable remainder trust or CRT (appreciated assets, including a family business) Briefly, a CRT eliminates the capital gains tax and estate tax.

(5) FLIP (for all assets not list above, generally income producing investments).

(6) Irrevocable life insurance trust or ILIT (insurance is estate tax free to you and your spouse). Use other assets to pay premiums at little or no tax cost.

(7) Premium financing (allows you to buy insurance without paying premiums in cash).

Don’t go overboard with one kind of tax strategy

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Professionally, my second love is writing this column. My first love is consulting with the people who read it.

Every family I work with is different. So are their businesses, their situations, their problems. In spite of these differences, I’m rarely surprised by anything totally new. But one reader sent me something I had never seen before.

Here’s the story.

After about an hour on the phone discussing an estate plan, son Sam calling at the request of dad Joe agreed to send me some typical information: tax returns, financial statements and a copy of the existing plan. About one week later, a heavy box arrived with a five-inch stack of documents. About four inches worth were nine separate family limited partnerships. They were the same except each partnership owned a different asset: the family business, a residence, investments, etc.

As I thumbed through the papers, I couldn’t help thinking about the drunk who was told, “A shot of whiskey each day is good for you.” The guy who did Joe’s estate plan was clearly drunk on partnerships.

One thing should be made clear: I am an enthusiastic cheerleader for the use of limited partnerships in estate planning. Use ‘em all the time. But this overkill of a single strategy just didn’t do the best possible job.

Using the computations of the adviser, the IRS would get more than $2 million in estate taxes. Another $1.1 million of IRS enrichment was likely because of a gross misuse of the partnership strategy.

What does a family limited partnership accomplish? It allows you as a general partner to totally control the use of any asset transferred to the partnership yet reduce the value of the assets transferred. For example, $1 million of assets transferred to a partnership are usually worth only about $650,000 for tax purposes. That $350,000 discount in a 55 percentestate-tax bracket would reduce your estate-tax burden by $192,500. Not bad!

A familylimited partnership is also a great asset-protection strategy. Creditors can’t get at the assets in the partnership. Neither can divorcing spouses of your kids, who are usually the limited partners.

Used properly, a partnership is almost a perfect tax tool. In general, don’t use them to own the stock of your family business. Nor should one be used for non-income-producing personal assets, like a home or car. It’s a valuable strategy for almost every other asset you might own: publicly traded stocks and bonds, real estate, you name it.

Without covering every detail, we terminated the partnerships that held the family business and two family homes. The business elected S corporation status and was transferred to an intentionally defective trust, and the residences were transferred to qualified personal residence trusts. Those are similar concepts that allow you to heavily discount the value of the assets transferred to them.

We used the liquid assets in two other partnerships to pay the premiums on second-to-die life insurance on Joe and his wife, which was owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust that we created. That trust removes life insurance from the taxable estate of the husband and wife.

When all the smoke clears, Joe and his four children, including Sam, will be enriched $4 million to $7 million more than the original overkill plan, depending on how long Joe and his wife live.

One warning: This is an example of overindulgence in one tax strategy. Although the above descriptions cover the main points of how Joe’s problems were solved., this is not a do-it-yourself kit. There are a number of traps and exceptions. Only proceed with the help of an expert.

Save by getting the real estate out of the corporation

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Do you have real estate in your corporation? If so, raise your hand and keep reading. About once a month, we get a call at the office asking a question something like this: “How can I get real estate out of my corporation without being taxed to death?”

Actually, we could write a small book about the various facts and circumstances you should consider. The book would answer many questions:

Are you a C corporation or an S corporation?

Are there retained earnings? How much?

How much has the real estate appreciated?

Each additional fact might change the tax strategy needed. To cover all the possibilities is beyond the scope of this column.

Instead, let’s set up the facts and circumstances that cover more 95 percent of the calls and the recommended solution to get-the-real-estate-out-of-the-corporation problem.

The typical facts and circumstances. Joe owns Success Co., a C corporation with a large amount of retained earnings and one or more pieces of real estate that have significantly appreciated in value. Most of the time the real estate has a building on it, but it could be vacant. (If Success Co. is an S corporation, it has a large amount of old C corporation earnings frozen in place, and the same real-estate facts).

The Solution. Keep in mind that you don’t have to know how to build a car in order to drive one. Don’t sweat the technical details; just concentrate on the unbelievable favorable tax results.

Here’s the easy six-step process:

1. Joe forms a family limited partnership outside of Success Co. Then Success Co. contributes vacant land to the partnership. (If the land is improved, Success Co. keeps the improvements as leasehold improvements.) Say the land is worth $1 million. In exchange, Success Co. receives ownership of 99 percent of the limited partnership. Joe contributes $10,000 in cash for a 1 percent general-partnership interest. As the general partner, Joe has all the voting rights and makes all the decisions.

2. Success Co. leases the land for $100,000 a year.

3. An independent appraiser values the limited partnership interest at $600,000 after applying a 40 percent discount for lack of marketability. Yes, the $1 million property is worth only $600,000, because it’s in the limited partnership merely for tax purposes.

4. Success Co. contributes 99 percent of its limited partnership to a charitable trust with the following terms: The partnership will pay $99,000 a year to the trust for eight years. (Typically the trust then makes contributions to Joe’s Family Foundation. Follow the money: Success pays $100,000 rent to the partnership, the partnership pays $99,000 to the trust and the trust contributes to Joe’s foundation.

5. Joe’s children buy the remaining 1 percent interest from Success Co. According to the IRS, the value of the $99,000 the trust will receive over the eight years is $569,000. So the value of the part of the partnership that Success Co. still owns is $600,000 minus the $569,000, or $31,000. Simply put, Success Co. owns an asset that according to the IRS is worth $31,000. That’s how much Joe’s children pay.

6. After eight years, the trust ends. Joe’s children, who are the beneficiaries of the trust, receive and now own the 99 percent of the limited partnership. Remember, they bought the other 1 percent from Success Co. eight years ago. So Success Co. and the trust are out of the picture.

Better yet, the real estate is out of the corporation, owned 100 percent by Joe’s children.

And there’s a bonus: The real estate is also out of Joe’s estate. The entire transaction is tax-free to the partnership, the trust, Joe, the kids and Success Co, except that Success might owe tax on the $31,000 sale.

How to invest your accumulated cash profits

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Business owners have many legitimate complaints these days: taxes, regulations, competition (from home and abroad), can’t find good people.

The list goes on and on. Always has, always will.

Yet the pride of the American capitalistic system is the successful family business. These entrepreneurs have found their way through, around or over the seemingly endless obstacles to become a “successful business owner.”

An SBO for short.

For the purposes of this article, SBOs have excess funds to invest (other than back into the operation of their business that produced the funds in the first place). Typically these excess funds are in one (or more) of three places: (1) still in the business, (2) in their (or spouse’s) name or (3) in a qualified plan (profit-sharing, 401(k), IRA or similar plan).

Over the years, the quote that follows has been nicknamed the SBO’s lament:

“I know how to make money in my business, but when it comes to making money with my investment money, either I don’t have time to watch it, don’t know how to watch it or rely on my investment advisor. When the market is up, my advisors do fine, when it’s down they do lousy.”

For the past couple of years, the lament usually ends with, “Now the market is lousy (or down, or uncertain, or similar words). What should I do?”

Now, regular readers of this column know that I am a tax planner prone to finding legal ways to avoid all types of taxes — particularly estate taxes. To do this requires, among other things, getting my client’s personal balance sheet.

Here’s what I can tell you that the balance sheets reveal about the investments of SBOs (and also other estate planning clients). Their success (or failure) in the stock market and a myriad of other investments, in general, mirrors the Dow Jones: happy on the way up and painful on the way down.

Usually, real estate investments are a winner.

Now what about that excess cash? Terrible results. Almost always the investments are conservative: divided between (1) CDs and money market funds, (2) municipal bonds and (3) a “zillion” variety of annuities. After taxes and inflation, your net earnings on (1) investments are typically less than 3 percent, sometimes even negative. Those income tax free bonds, (2), not only have a low rate of return, but fall in value when interest rates rise. Annuities, (3), could fill a large book to describe all the varieties and, most of all, the complaints from clients.

Never has a client told me that he/she is happy with the results of an annuity. (Sure would like to hear from a reader who has personally had a positive experience with any annuity.)

As you can imagine, almost every estate planning consultation with an SBO — and other clients — requires serious consideration concerning the client’s investments: safety, risk, tax consequences, rate of return and other factors. We discuss alternate investments, considering, among other things: profitability, risk and how taxed.

Currently, the most popular alternative investment is senior settlements (SS), also called Life Settlements. The following quote from The Wall Street Journal and USA Today (and other sources) tells you why SS are becoming such a popular investment.

“Life Settlements (have become a) trillion dollar industry, dominated by institutional investors including Berkshire Hathaway (billionaire Warren Buffet’s company), AIG and CNA. Their pursuit of this market is related to the degree of safety, high yields in excess of 15 percent per year and the fact that a Life Settlement is not affected by market forces.

“Life settlements are a very good option for the investor who has as his or her investment philosophy a desire for a secure, safe and ‘no risk’ investment. It is for your ‘nest egg’ money. It is not considered a security by SEC. Therefore it is not normally provided as an investment option by stock brokers.”

Of course, your question is: “Can a little guy (as opposed to an institutional investor) invest in SS?

Yes, it’s all made possible by a small, publicly traded (on the NASDAQ) company. Its average rate of return an SS investments has been 16.28 percent per year on average during the company’s 14-year operating history.

If you want to make a killing on your investments, SS are not for you. But if a 16 percent-plus rate of return, with no market risk is of interest to you (or your IRA, 401(k) or other qualified plan) fax me (847-674-5299) your name, address, phone numbers (business/home/cell) and estimated amount to invest ($50,000 minimum, for accredited investors).

Estate Tax Blog

by Irv Blackman

First and foremost, Irv Blackman is both a CPA and a lawyer. Irv is a tax guy. Stay tuned to the site by signing up for the RSS feed.