Archive for the ‘General Tax Strategies’ Category

Newer Entries »

Sick of paying tax? Call a tax doctor for a second opinion

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Often, I feel like an old-fashioned country doctor makin’ house calls. But there is a difference: my patients are sick of paying taxes.

Recently, I visited a successful family business in North Carolina, owned by a semi-retired 64-year-old named Joe and run by his son, Sam, a 36-year-old.

Joe called me. He wanted a second tax opinion for a business transfer plan and an estate plan put in place by Sam (with the advice of his professional advisors, the “best” estate planning team in the county) almost two years ago.

Wow, this patient was really sick (running a high tax fever, bleeding lots of tax dollars).

This is the story of the symptoms, the diagnosis and the “magic tax potions” that cured the patient.

First, the facts:

Joe owns 98 percent of two corporations: a profitable S corporation (Success Co.), which operates a string of stores, and a C corporation (a tax-paying corporation, called R/E Co.), which owns real estate leased to Success Co.

The real estate has an income tax basis of $1 million, but a current fair market value of about $6 million. Sam owns the remaining two percent of the stock of both corporations. Each of the corporations is the owner and beneficiary of a separate $1 million insurance policy on Joe’s life.

Four more little details:

• Joe’s second wife, Mary, is 45 years old and they have a premarital agreement that gives Mary the income from one-half of the value of Joe’s assets at his death for as long as Mary lives. But get this: none of the stock of Success Co. can be used to provide Mary her income.

• An artificially low price in a buy/sell agreement would force Joe’s estate to sell his stock in Success Co. back to Success Co. and the same for R/E Co. (Result: Sam would then own 100 percent of both corporations.)

• Joe has two other grown children who are not in the business.

• Joe is not insurable.

The diagnosis:

• The $1 million in life insurance payable to R/E Co. would kick up an unnecessary alternative minimum tax.

• The full $2 million of insurance would be included in Joe’s estate because he controls both corporations, but the $2 million (less the alternative minimum tax of about $150,000) would belong to the corporations, not Joe’s estate.

• There are not enough liquid assets to satisfy the obligation to Mary. Worse yet, if the obligation to Mary is met, there would be zero dollars (outside of the corporations) to pay an estimated $3.5 million estate tax liability. Simply put, the estate would be broke.

Our objectives to cure Joe’s tax illness are clear:

• Reduce the value of Joe’s estate.

• Get cash to fund the obligation to Mary.

• Pay the estate tax.

Here are the five major tax medicines I recommended to cure Joe’s business transfer and estate plan:

• Merge R/E Co. into Success Co. This maneuver is tax-free. R/E Co. is worth about $6 million as a real estate investment company but, as part of the operating company, its value is reduced by at least $2 million for estate tax purposes. Estate tax saving — over $1 million.

• Transfer the nonvoting stock (created after the merger) to a grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT), which reduces the value of Success Co. by about 40 percent for estate tax purposes. This maneuver saves about $.5 million in estate taxes.

• Joe takes the $2 million in insurance policies out of the corporations and gives it to his children. Result: The value of Joe’s estate drops about $2 million and will save another $1 million plus in estate tax.

• Change Joe’s will to put the entire estate tax obligation on the children. The $2 million in income tax-free/estate tax-free insurance proceeds will handle the entire estate tax load when Joe dies.

• Make sure Joe’s will qualifies for the 100 percent marital deduction for Mary’s one-half share, thus deferring any estate tax on this portion of Joe’s estate until Mary dies. Yes, there are other details and nuances in the plan, including gifts to Joe’s children, but these five tax medicines cured the patient.

What’s the lesson to be learned from this true-life Joe/Sam/Mary story? Always, yes always, get a second opinion after your estate plan is done, preferably before any documents are signed.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General Tax Strategies, General Tax Talk, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Tax Secrets of the Wealthy: These M7 Strategies Are Simply Magnificent

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

More than 90 percent of contacts with readers of this column are specific questions or concerns involving the “Magnificent Seven” (M7). What are the M7?

Actually, they are seven separate strategies designed to answer the questions and at the same time to save huge amounts of estate tax or create huge amounts of wealth (usually tax-free).

Using just one M7 is fun. Two or more is party time.

So let’s visit with each M7 partygoer — first the specific questions, then the answer and the strategy (to eliminate any concerns). Remember: Each M7 you are about to meet represents a most popular strategy according to readers of my column in the past two years.

• M7 No. 1 — “How can I get my family business (Success Co.) out of my estate, transfer it to my kids yet keep control for life?”

Create voting and non-voting stock, then transfer the non-voting stock to your business kids. Also use these strategies: a recapitalization to create the non-voting stock and an intentionally defective trust to transfer the stock. The voting stock, which you keep, maintains your control. All the strategies are tax-free — to you, your kids and Success Co.

• M7 No. 2 — How can I earn large returns every year without risk?”

Invest in senior settlements/transferable insurance policies (TIPs). The average TIP rate of return per year is in the 12- to 14-percent range, available from a 14-year-old company that is public (on the NASDAQ). Minimum investment is $50,000 for qualified investors.

• M7 No. 3 — “How can I avoid the double tax (income and estate) that hits all qualified plans (like an IRA, 401(k) profit-sharing)?”

Use a subtrust. It’s true: The tax collector can get up to 73 percent of your plan funds (that’s $730,000 per $1 million). Your family gets only $270,000. A subtrust allows you to use plan funds to buy life insurance (usually second-to-die). One reader turned $240,000 into $4.5 million of tax-free life insurance.

• M7 No. 4 — “How do I know if my completed (or proposed) estate plan is done and done right?”

Easy. You must be able to answer “Yes” to both of these questions: (1) Do you have and will you continue to have absolute control of your business and other assets? And (2) Will all of your wealth pass intact — every penny of it — to your family when you die. “All” means if you, for example are worth $6 million, the entire $6 million (fill in your own net worth number) to your family. If you can’t answer ‘Yes’ to these two questions, get a second opinion from an independent professional.

• M7 No. 5 — “I have significant excess cash or cash-like assets (municipal bonds, certificates of deposits, and the like). I’m conservative. Hate risk. Are there any tax-advantaged investments for me?”

Yes, conservative investment life insurance (CILI) that is really a conservation investment. The insurance company agrees to guarantee you that upon your death your heirs will receive the sum of the following: (1) All premiums you paid (say you paid $20,000 per year for 20 years. Your heirs will get back the entire $400,000), plus (2) a guaranteed rate of return on all premiums paid (usually around 3%), plus (3) the death benefit as a bonus (say $1 million, but could be more or less depending on your age and health). Get a personal quote. You’ll be delighted. And oh, yes, all earnings and the death benefit (all three items) are tax-free.

• M7 No. 6. “Is there a way to reduce the value of my business for tax purposes?”

Absolutely! Take advantage of the three discounts allowed by the tax law: (1) lack of marketability, (2) minority interest and (3) non-voting stock is worth less than voting stock. Result, a $2 million business after discounts, is worth, (for tax purposes) in the $1.1 million to $1.2 million range.

• M7 No. 7 — “Is there any way to finance the cost of life insurance to significantly reduce the out-of-pocket cost of the insurance?”

Yes, it’s called premium financing. The strategy is easiest to explain by example. A 60-year-old reader got $5 million of insurance with a total cost (to be paid over his life) of $368,000. A 56-year-old husband with a 56-year-old wife bought $5 million with a total projected outlay of only $79,000. You must be worth a minimum of $5 million (more is better) and be 65 years young or younger.

Of course, you want to get to know one or more of the M7 people better. More info. Maybe you have a question. Will the strategy work for you, your family and your business?

Here’s what to do: Contact me with the following: (1) identify the M7 strategy you want to learn about; (2) your name, address and all phone numbers where you can be reached; (3) your birthday and same for other family members if insurance is involved; (4) a short statement of your specific facts; (5) fax to 847-674-5299 or e-mail me at wealthy@blackmankallick.com with “M-7 query” in the subject line.

I’ll summarize the best responses (all identities to be withheld) in future columns.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies, Insurance, Investment Strategies, Planning, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Irv Didn’t Invent Taxes, Just 227 Ways To Beat Them

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

There are three main ways the federal tax law picks your pocket and becomes your legal partner: payroll taxes, the income tax and the estate tax. So, how can you fight back?  Here are five areas in which you can save money from taxes.

Column from: Modern Machine Shop, Contributed by: Irving L. Blackman

Would you believe that the basic tax law, the Internal Revenue Code and regulations, is about 50,000 pages long with no logical, organized theme? There’s also a constant stream of Internal Revenue Service rulings and case law. No one person can know it all—not Congress, which passes the law, nor the IRS, which enforces it.

There are three main ways the federal tax law picks your pocket and becomes your legal partner: payroll taxes, the income tax and the estate tax. So, how can you fight back? One day, just for fun, we (four tax guys) started to count the ways to legally get around paying the three taxes listed. We were just getting warmed up when we counted 227 options and stopped. The following are five areas in which you can save money from taxes:

1. Payroll Taxes. This money-stealing parasite is persistent and expensive: This year, $16,404 on the first $106,800 of your earnings goes to the tax man. That’s a scandalous 9.76 percent. For earnings of more than $106,800, you pay an additional 2.9 percent.

Here are examples of the three most common ways to lose payroll taxes to the IRS: The first mistake involves Joe, the owner of an S corporation who taxes a large salary (often $500,000 or more) and takes a huge bonus at the year’s end to bring down profits. For this S corporation, a tax-free dividend instead of compensation would save a bundle of unnecessary payroll taxes and would cost no more in income taxes. A second payroll tax mistake is when owners’ wives and moms take a salary when they either don’t work or are overpaid. It is much better tax-wise to give them a gift. The third mistake is operating a business as an LLC, which makes all income to the owner(s) subject to payroll taxes.

2. Asset Protection. In a heartbeat, your family wealth, including your business, can be depleted or even destroyed by a lawsuit.

Keep your business thin by keeping only those assets—typically, necessary cash, inventory and receivables—needed for operations in your business. Here are some basic sub-strategies: Elect S corporation status; personally own (via separate LLCs) any new real estate or expensive equipment, and lease it to your operating company; and never own delivery vehicles in your operating company. Put the vehicles into a separate corporation or LLC.

The sad fact is, we can’t protect the assets inside of your operating company, but we can protect you and your spouse. All of your significant assets are simply retitled using typical lifetime planning documents—such as family limited partnerships, LLCs and appropriate trusts.

3. Life Insurance. You can save money in taxes whether you, your spouse or your kids own the insurance.

Critical issues concerning life insurance are premium cost, the death benefit and the tax due on the benefit at death (usually the estate tax). The following are common ways to modify insurance plans to save premiums or increase the death benefit without additional costs:

• For single life or second-to-die insurance, you can get a cash-surrender value of more than $200,000 on a policy that is 9 years old or older. This results in significantly more death benefit for the same premium cost or a significantly reduced premium cost for the same death benefit.

• If you, the husband, are at least 55 years old, worth more than $5 million and have insurance on your life only, you are wasting premium dollars. Second-to-die coverage with your wife will typically give you the same death benefit for about 35 percent less premium cost.

• If you have more than $400,000 in a qualified plan such as a 401(k) or IRA, that amount is subject to a double tax (income and estate) of as much as 73 percent to the IRS. On average, you can turn every $270,000 of after-tax dollars into $3 to $5 million (tax-free), depending on your age and health. This plan works for second-to-die or single life insurance.

4. Business Succession. This affects your business and your business kids. The typical business owner wants to transfer the business to his kid(s) so that he and his kid(s) don’t get killed by taxes. He also wants to treat his non-business kids fairly, ensure that he controls his business for as long as he lives and ensure that the company stock stays in the family by never going to a kid’s ex-spouse. Every one of these goals is easily accomplished. Best of all, the business can be transferred tax-free, with no income tax, gift tax or estate tax for the owner or the kids.

5. Estate Plan. A proper estate plan is actually two plans: a lifetime plan and a death plan. The plans are designed to cover every significant tax-saving possibility—from the minute the lifetime plan is created until after you get hit by the final bus (covered by the death plan).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, General Tax Strategies, Irv Talk, Retirement Tax Advice | No Comments »

Business appraisal protects your family from unnecessary taxation.

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

Do you know how to make a grown man cry? Tell him his business has been destroyed by fire, flood or an act of God.

Yes, a tragedy. Bad stuff. But, most likely, the loss was insured — a bit of help. It’s even more important if Joe Owner is there on the scene to assess the damage, make plans and start rebuilding. Chances are he will make the business bigger and better than before.

End of Scene 1.

Here is Scene 2. Even the most successful, egotistical and immortal business owner knows that some day he must go to the “big business in the sky.” That will not make Joe Owner cry. He is too realistic for that. But tell him that after he is gone, his present plans, or better yet — lack of a plan — mean the Internal Revenue Service will dismantle his business.

Imagine our departed Joe in heaven; sitting on a cloud; talking to a representative of the revenue service. Joe speaks first.

“Why?” he asks.

“To pay taxes,” answers the tax representative.

“How?” he asks.

“By selling off the assets necessary to pay the tax.”

“When?” he asks.

“Within two years.”

“Why?” Joe demands.

“To pay your federal estate tax liability.”

“How much?” he queries.

“That depends on the value of your business.”

“Good,” says Joe. “I can show you just how little the business is worth without me.”

“Sorry,” responds the IRS representative. “It’s too late for that now.”

The curtain goes down.

Welcome back to earth. Is the above scenario realistic? Yes.

Crazy as it sounds.

If you own a closely held business and don’t pin down its value for tax purposes while you are alive, you are setting yourself up to be mugged by the IRS.

Every business — like it or not — must some day be valued for tax purposes. It is best for it to be done voluntarily, by you (the owner) during life. If not, the valuation will be done in an involuntary situation, after death, by the revenue service.

The only “out” is to sell the business in a real transaction during your life. For most business owners, selling doesn’t make sense for many reasons.

The two most common reasons are: First, the typical business owner wants to transfer the business to his or her kids; or second, wants to keep on working until he or she goes to business heaven.

The message should be clear: Want to save your business and your family untold aggravation, not to mention savings of 55 percent, the highest estate tax bracket in 2011? Then do three things: Find out the value of your business for tax purposes by getting an appraisal. Put a transfer plan, usually to your kids, in place during your life.

And then dovetail the first two steps with your estate plan.

Done right, you can transfer your business to your kids tax-free during your life, beat the estate tax collector legally, and control your business for as long as you live.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Corporate Tax, Estate Tax, General Tax Strategies, Insurance, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Gaining wealth is easy when compared with human aspect of tax game

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

Recently, I read an article titled What Makes for Success? by Kemmons Wilson, the founder of Holiday Inn. He said, “It is great to attain wealth, but money is really just one way — and hardly the best way — to keep score.”

Interesting quote, huh?

Most readers of this column call me with tax problems because they have attained wealth (no doubt they have and do keep score with money) and they don’t want to share that wealth with the IRS — perfectly normal. Yet, it’s amazing. Once the reader realizes that we really do know how to pass their wealth — all of it and intact — to their family, the conversation turns to other ways that they might keep score. Sure, they are delighted to find there are legal ways to totally win the estate tax game. But they readily admit that they don’t know how to deal with the other problems (other ways to keep score).

The other problems fall into the general category of little kids, little problems; big kids, big problems.

Stuff like which of my kids should run the business? How do I treat the kids fairly? What about the non-business kids?

What happens if one (or more) of my kids get divorced? How do I take care of my wife (the second one who is 15 years — or more — younger than the caller)? The callers tell me about family problems, business problems and/or assorted personal problems. To me every word is important, even though I’ve listened to so many tales of woe before. But, although similar, each problem has its own peculiar twists and turns.

Let’s face it — stuff happens. After years of solving wealth transfer problems, business succession (usually the business is at center stage) and estate planning problems, experience has taught me that solving only the money problems can never yield a perfect plan.

The human stuff — your spouse and kids support your plan — must be solved too.

What about your son-in-law or daughter-in-law? I know. It sounds like cornball. But if you really want to win the game of life after you have won the money game (really the easy part), you must attempt to solve the human part, the emotional stuff.

Here’s my suggestion to start the process. Make two lists: the money-problem list and the human-problem list.

Solve the money problems first (usually you are home free if you solve these three money problems:

• maintain your lifestyle — and your spouse’s — for as long as you live;

• transfer your business to the business kids — tax-free; and

• kill the estate tax.

Then, it’s easier to tackle the human-problem list. Interesting, many times solving the money problems also solve some (often all) of the human problems.

Finally, you must work with experienced professionals who know how to solve both problems: the money problems and the emotional human problems that come with accumulating wealth and trying to pass it on.

One more thing: Each piece of your plan must be part of a single comprehensive and integrated plan, all implemented at the same time. Piecemeal planning, based on my 50 years of experience, is a disaster that not only enriches the IRS, but fails to satisfy the normal human desires of a typical family and its business.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies | No Comments »

One happy Mom learned that the right planning can be tax magic.

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Do you have a large amount of retained earnings and excess cash in your corporation, but the double taxing power of the law has your cash locked in the corporation? Most business owners think they are stuck, but there’s a way out.

Here’s a true story of one way to get the job done. You’ll like it. Joe called me with this problem. Joe and his brother Jeff each owned 30 percent of Success Co., which they managed.

His mom, Mary, 66, owned 20 percent in her own name, and a trust created when Joe’s dad died owned the other 20 percent. Mary’s professional advisors recommended that she obtain $2 million of insurance using an irrevocable life insurance trust to pay the estate tax liability that would be due at her death — because of the value of the assets she owned directly in her own name and indirectly as a beneficiary of her deceased husband’s trust. The advisors were right. Mary needed the insurance, but she did not have any chance of coming up with the annual premium requirements of $32,000 for as long as she lived.

I asked Joe lots of questions, conferred with the advisors and requested a large pile of information — stuff like tax returns, financial statements, etc. After discovering that Success Co. had $2.5 million in excess cash, this is what I recommended.

Mary gifts $1.2 million of her Success Co. stock — the total value of Success Co. was appraised at over $8 million — to a charitable remainder trust. The charitable trust agrees to pay Mary $72,000 per year for as long as she lives. At Mary’s death, the balance, called the “remainder,” in the trust would go to charity. Each year Mary must pay $25,000 in income tax on the $72,000 of income from the charitable trust and $32,000 in premiums for the $2 million policy, which is owned by the life insurance trust, or a total of $57,000. This leaves Mary an extra $15,000 per year to buy presents for her grandchildren.

The life insurance trust will give Mary’s children $2 million in insurance proceeds when she dies. The entire $2 million will be tax free: no income tax and no estate tax.

But where does the charitable trust get the income to pay Mary? The charitable trust sells the gifted stock back to Success Co. for $1.2 million.

Let’s summarize Mary’s tax picture. Mary avoids all capital gains tax on the sale of the Success Co. stock. The balance in the charitable trust estimated at $1.1 million at Mary’s death goes to Mary’s favorite charity and is free of income tax and estate tax.

In addition, Mary gets an immediate income tax deduction of about $200,000 for her contribution to the charitable trust.

Simply put, even though Mary avoids both the capital gains tax and the estate tax, the IRS writes her a check. For what, you ask? For the present value of the remainder of the $1.2 million gifted to the charitable trust. This $200,000 (immediate deduction) results in about $70,000 in cash income tax savings for Mary — more expensive presents for the grandkids.

(Note: If Mary had sold the $1.2 million of Success Co. stock directly to the company, it would have been taxed as a dividend, resulting in a whopping tax of $180,000.)

A side note before concluding: There are many other ways to get cash or other types of property out of C corporations in a tax-effective manner. If you have such a problem, as a service to readers of this column, call me with your problem (847) 674-5295.

The use of a charitable remainder trust in tandem with an irrevocable life insurance trust is actually a method for making a tax-advantaged investment for your family. You may actually create wealth and make a real economic profit by giving to charity.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Estate Tax, Family Tax Issues, General Tax Strategies | No Comments »

At last, a tax-deferred concept that gives high returns

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Tax-free investments are big.

The interesting ones are even bigger. Logically, tax-free should be No. 1. But the cruel fact is that with the exception of life insurance — you must die to get your tax-free reward — or municipal bonds (plagued by low return rates), there just isn’t much to talk about that is tax-free.

Tax-deferred is a different situation. That’s where the action is. The biggest tax-deferred “sandbox” is qualified plans.

Profit-sharing plans, 401(k) plans, IRAs of all sorts and others abound. Billions of dollars pour into these plans every year. Employer-sponsored plans are usually the tax weapon of choice. Non-employer plans, such as traditional and Roth IRAs, give every taxpayer an opportunity to play in this sandbox.

While IRAs have dollar limits, tax-deferred annuities have none. You can toss as many after-tax dollars as you like into annuities. Not one cent is deductible. But annuities are lower earners and result in severe penalties if withdrawn early. Simply put, there’s no liquidity.

So what’s the magnet that draws billions of dollars into this not-such-a-good-deal investment? Here’s the answer in one magic phrase: tax-deferred.

A word about annuity return rates:

• Fixed annuities are the most popular. They currently pay 3 percent to 3½ percent per year. Older annuities, purchased when interest rates were higher, paid more.

• The new darling is indexed annuities. Yield is pegged to some index, typically Standard & Poor’s, on an annual basis. Often in a loss year, indexed annuities guarantee a smaller yield, usually 1½ percent to 3 percent.

When the index rises to 4 percent, that is the percentage investors get. A large rise is capped at 6 percent to 8 percent. For example, at an increase of 14 percent, investors would receive only 7 percent.

What’s a tax-deferred investment that doesn’t have all the impediments of annuities and has a huge return rate without risk?

• The answer is senior settlements. The following example is the easiest way to explain.

Suppose Joe, 68, has a $400,000 life insurance policy with a cash surrender value of $50,000. Joe would like to stop his annual premium payments.

Instead of canceling the policy and taking the $50,000 from the insurance company, Joe sells his policy as a senior settlement and receives $120,000.

Joe’s a happy camper.

Investors bought Joe’s policy.

Senior settlements have been around for about 35 years. Their tax consequences are a delight. Tax liabilities on profits are completely deferred until the investor receives back the entire investment and profit.

There’s a public company that trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market offering senior settlements. The average rate of return is 16.36 percent per year and has been over 16 percent throughout the company’s 14-year history.

If your goal is to make a killing on your investments, senior settlements are not for you.

It should be noted that American International Group, the giant insurance company, and Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway invest in senior settlements.

But if an average return rate of more than 16 percent with no market risk is of interest to you, learn more about senior settlements. Just fax your name, address, phone numbers and estimated amount to invest to me at 417-9045.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General Tax Strategies, Investment Strategies, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Senior settlements an easy way to get high rate of return!

Friday, March 27th, 2009

When giving my tax-planning, wealth-building seminars, I usually ask the audience, “Do you know the ‘Rule of 72′ and how it works?”

Typically, about one-third of the people raise their hands.

Then I explain the wonderful, helpful Rule of 72:

“Write the number 72 on a piece of paper. Assume you can get a 10 percent rate of return.

Divide 10 into 72. You get 7.2.

What that means is your principal sum will double every 7.2 years.

“For example, $10,000 compounding for a period of 36 years will double exactly five times and give you $320,000.

Stop for a minute — do the simple math yourself. Fun, eh?”

But wait! What if that 10 percent return was subject to a 40 percent state and federal income tax? Then you would have only a 6 percent return — 72 divided by six means 12 years to double your money.

Now your $10,000 will double only three times over the same 36-year period ($10,000 to $20,000, $20,000 to $40,000, and $40,000 to $80,000).

Compare that $80,000 with $320,000 when tax-deferred (or tax-free). A huge difference.

So, now we know two factors that are measurably important to creating wealth: rate of return and tax deferment.

Let’s explore tax deferment first.

If you have money in a qualified plan — 401(k), profit-sharing, IRA or other qualified plan — you are on the tax-deferred road. If you are the proud owner of a Roth IRA or the new Roth 401(k), you can wave your tax-free flag.

Now the hard part: the rate of return. How would you like to average more than a 16 percent rate of return per year? You can. The concept is called senior settlements, or SS.

Let me introduce you to senior settlements by quoting a May 18 article from The Wall Street Journal titled Moving the Market:

“AIG (the insurance giant) has bought less than 1,500 policies since 2001, according to spokesman Wil Nans.

“The industry’s annual returns of 10 percent to 15 percent first attracted European and Asian investors. And a few years ago, Berkshire Hathaway Inc., the investment vehicle of billionaire investor Warren Buffett, began buying life settlements, according to securities filings.”

A senior settlement is simply the purchase of an existing insurance policy from a senior (65 or older) by an investor.

The selling senior, who no longer wants to pay premiums, gets a much larger price for the policy than by taking the cash surrender value from the insurance company. The senior wins. The investor wins by making a large profit without risk (the senior is sure to die).

Can you become one of the investors? Yes. A public company trading on the Nasdaq makes it easy. The average rate of return on senior settlements is 16.36 percent per year and has been more than 16 percent throughout the company’s 14-year operating history.

You can become a senior-settlement investor in one of three ways: taxable, tax-deferred or tax-free. Following are the most common possibilities:

• Taxable. You use your own funds or funds you control, like your corporation or other business entities, family limited partnerships and any noncharitable trust.

• Tax-deferred. Almost everyone can play this profitable game via a qualified plan. The trustees of pension plans or other plans that are not self-directed can join the profitable fun by investing the plan funds in senior settlements for the benefit of all participants.

• Tax-free. A Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) can fatten your tax-free accumulations. Charitable entities — charitable remainder and lead trusts and family foundations — are a perfect fit.

As you can see, we have a very positive attitude toward the potential wealth-building power of senior settlements.

But since senior settlements are probably new to almost everyone reading these words, here’s a suggestion:

Show this column to you professional advisers — CPA, lawyer, banker, financial planner and others.

Discuss senior settlements from at least these two aspects concerning your investments (taxable or otherwise):

1. The next time you are about to make an investment, determine how senior settlements compare with other possible investment choices.

2. Compare existing investments with your long-term (don’t forget to apply the Rule of 72) and short-term (about three to five years) goals.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General Tax Strategies, Investment Strategies, Tax Strategies | No Comments »

Double rewards!

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Patrick Henry once said: “I have but one lamp by which my feet are lighted, and that is the lamp of experience.”

After years of working in wealth transfer, business succession, estate planning and related areas, I changed my view of my clients’ philosophies.

Why? Experience!

You’ll like what you are about to read: How to actually make money while giving it away.

An important task for tax advisers, particularly those doing estate planning, is to make sure they have a clear understanding of each client’s goals. So, one of the questions my staff or I ask each client is: “Do you have charitable intent?” Most clients answer no, and that is that.

In years past when a client answered affirmatively, we had a large arsenal of tax-advantaged charitable strategies that would enrich not only charity, but our clients, too. Every client made an after-tax profit.

One day about 10 years ago, we decided to dig a bit deeper when a client answered negatively to our charity question.

Here are the two most important questions we asked, the answers we got, and to our surprise, what we learned.

• A simple one-word question: “Why?”

About two-thirds of clients responded with something like: “I don’t want to reduce the amount of my children’s and grandchildren’s inheritance.”

After we learned this, it made good sense to follow with the next question — actually two questions — designed to get a “yes”:

• First, “Would you consider making a substantial gift to charity, if it would not reduce your heirs’ inheritance?”

And if that didn’t do the trick, we asked: “Would you make a large charitable gift if you could actually make an after-tax profit?”

Now, almost all clients said “yes” or “show me how” or something similar.

The simple fact is that the tax law has two tax-free environments: charity and life insurance. Marry them and you are on the road to tax heaven.

Let’s stay away from the technical stuff, like charitable remainder trusts and charitable lead trusts and their many ways to help you and charity, and look at two basic examples.

Example 1

Suppose Joe and Mary, married and both 65, buy a 15-year-pay, $4 million second-to-die life insurance policy.

The annual premium is $20,618 per $1 million payable for 15 years, or a total of $1.237 million. Joe and Mary set it up so their favorite charity is irrevocably the beneficiary of the policy.

Let’s take a look at the tax consequences of this charitable gesture by Joe and Mary.

They are in a 40-percent income-tax bracket, counting state and federal combined, and a 55-percent estate-tax bracket, using 2011 rates.

First, let’s look at the estate-tax picture. In a 55-percent estate-tax bracket, the real story is that the IRS gets paid 55 percent of that $1.237 million.

Since it’s gone, the IRS can’t tax it. So, the real out-of-pocket cost to Joe and Mary (after estate tax consideration) is only $557,000 (45 percent of $1.237 million).

Second, let’s look at the income tax consequences of the transaction. In a 40-percent income-tax bracket, Joe and Mary save $8,247 ($20,618 times 40 percent) each year as a charitable deduction.

Next, Joe and Mary buy $1.6 million of 15-year pay, second-to-die life insurance in an irrevocable life insurance trust, to keep the proceeds out of their estate. What’s the annual premium cost for only 15 years? You guessed it — their annual $8,247 income tax savings.

Finally, let’s put it all together. Their favorite charity will wind up with $4 million. Their family will make more than a cool $1 million ($1.6 insurance proceeds less the $557,000 after-tax cost of the premiums paid for the gift to charity).

Example 2

The above is only the tip of the iceberg. There are dozens of similar strategies to enrich your family while you enrich charity.

This example and the one with the best leverage is “premium financing,” where $500,000 can be turned into $6.5 million for Joe and Mary and then shared with their favorite charity. Joe and Mary can divide the $6.5 million — $5 million to their family and $1.5 million to charity — or in any other ratio they desire.

Now, $500,000 is turned into $5.5 million. That’s tax and economic leverage!

Most of the time, your favorite charity is your own family foundation, which bears your name. By now you get the idea. If you, your spouse or both are lucky enough to be insurable, you can leverage small amounts of capital — an investment of $500,000 or less paid out in small amounts over many years — to mushroom into tax-free amounts of $5 million or more. Divide your tax-free profits between your family and charity any way you desire.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General Tax Strategies, Investment Strategies | No Comments »

Newer Entries »

Estate Tax Blog

by Irv Blackman

First and foremost, Irv Blackman is both a CPA and a lawyer. Irv is a tax guy. Stay tuned to the site by signing up for the RSS feed.